Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T01:00:42.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subclinical Bias, Manners, and Moral Harm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Mundane and often subtle forms of bias generate harms that can be fruitfully understood as akin to the harms evident in rudeness. Although subclinical expressions of bias are not mere rudeness, like rudeness they often manifest through the breach of mannerly norms for social cooperation and collaboration. At a basic level, the perceived harm of mundane forms of bias often has much to do with feeling oneself unjustly or arbitrarily cut out of a group, a group that cooperates and collaborates but does not do so with me. Appealing to the subtle but familiar choreography of mannered social interaction, I argue, makes it easier to recognize how exclusion can be accomplished through slight but symbolically significant gestures and styles of interaction, where bias manifests not in announced hostility but in an absence of the cooperation and collaboration upon which we rely socially.

Type
Open Issue Content
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brennan, Samantha. Forthcoming. Rethinking the moral significance of micro‐inequities: The case of women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Jenkins, Fiona and Hutchison, Katrina.Google Scholar
Buss, Sarah. 1999. Appearing respectful: The moral significance of manners. Ethics 109 (4): 795826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingarette, Herbert. 1998. Confucius: The secular as sacred. New York: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1956. The will to believe. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Kupperman, Joel. 2010. Confucian civility. Dao 9: 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Judith. 1996. Miss manners rescues civilization from sexual harassment, frivolous lawsuits, dissing, and other lapses in civility. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2006. What is philosophy? Philosophy 81 (316): 189207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. Forthcoming. Implicit bias, stereotype threat, and women in philosophy. In Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, ed. Jenkins, Fiona and Hutchison, Katrina.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert. 2003. The joy of philosophy: Thinking thin versus the passionate life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohr, Karen. 2011. On manners. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar