No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Being a Thomist: Cornelius Ernst's Meta-Theology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Thomism is a contested category that exhibits considerable plasticity in its application. An examination of the role played by such invocations of proper names in contemporary theological discourse indicates the importance of textual accessibility and engagement. The role played by texts is examined in terms of an often-elided distinction between ‘intelligibility’ and ‘readability’, with the former aligned with propositional contents and the latter a more expansive attentiveness to the text's performative operations. The historical remoteness of Aquinas coupled with the importation into theology of secularised reading strategies is seen to have alienated the full readability of Aquinas's texts. Acting against Cartesian modes of reading, Cornelius Ernst's re-performance of Thomistic pedagogy as ‘engaged contemplation’ is concerned to enact a horizon of meaning within which Aquinas's texts retain enduring readability. This article develops Ernst's Thomistic meta-theology into an account of Thomism as ‘meta-reading’. On this account, authentic Thomism involves the intentional cultivation of a total human culture, within which the inherently theological discipline of textual engagement exercises a quasi-liturgical function.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2021 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Richard Rorty suggested that proceeding in terms of proper names rather than propositions differentiates ‘continental’ philosophy from analytic approaches, see: Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 81 fn 3.Google Scholar
2 On the complexities of Thomist self-identification, see: Lauder, Robert E., “On Being or Not Being a Thomist,” The Thomist 55, no. 2 (1991): 301-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Ventimiglia, Giovanni, Aquinas after Frege (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), 1-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Cf., Braaten, Carl E and Jenson, Robert W., In One Body Through the Cross: The Princeton Proposal for Christian Unity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003), 41-42.Google Scholar
5 Ernst, Cornelius, Multiple Echo: Explorations in Theology, ed. Radcliffe, Timothy and Kerr, Fergus (London: Darton, Longman Todd, 1979), 11Google Scholar. Hereafter cited as ‘ME’.
6 Cunningham, Conor, Genealogy of nihilism : philosophies of nothing and the difference of theology, Radical orthodoxy series Y (London: London : Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
7 PI. §293
8 Butler, Judith, “Introduction,” in Of Grammatology, ed. Derrida, Jacques (2016), vii-xxiv.Google ScholarPubMed
9 Scruton, Roger, Fools, Frauds and Firebrands (London: Bloomsbury, 2015)Google Scholar.
10 Evans, Dylan, An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis (London: Routledge, 1996), 119.Google Scholar
11 Benjamin, Walter, ‘The Task of the Translator’, in Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, ed. Arendt, Hannah (Boston: Mariner, 1968), 11-25.Google Scholar
12 See, for instance, Chenu, Marie-Dominique, Toward Understanding St Thomas, trans. Landry, A. -M. (Chicago: Regnery, 1964)Google Scholar.
13 Roy, Louis, ‘Cornelius Ernst's Theological Seeds’, New Blackfriars 85, no. 998 (2004): 459-70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kerr, Fergus, ‘Ansombe, Ernst and McCabe: Wittgenstein and Catholic Theology’, Josephinum 15, no. 1 (2008): 128-48Google Scholar; Williams, Rowan, The Edge of Words: God and the Habits of Language (London: Continuum, 2014), Ch. 1Google Scholar; Keenan, Oliver James, ‘Sacrament of the Dynamic Transcendence of Christianity: Cornelius Ernst on the Church’, New Blackfriars 94, no. 1052 (2013): 396-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 ME, 7.
15 ME, 9.
16 ME, 10.
17 ME, 11.
18 ME, 12.
19 ME, 11.
20 ME, 11.
21 Egan, David, ‘Pictures in Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy’, Philosophical Investigations 34, no. 1 (2011): 55-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Mills, Jon, ‘The False Dasein’, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 28, no. 1 (1997): 42-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Egan, David, The Pursuit of an Authentic Philosophy: Wittgenstein, Heidegger and the Everyday (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 ME, 74.
25 ME, 142.
26 ME, 139.
27 McDowell, John, ‘Non-Cognitivism and Rule Following’, in Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, ed. Holtzman, Stephen and Leich, Christopher M. (London: Routledge, 1981), 141-72.Google Scholar
28 ME: 74.
29 Ernst, Cornelius, The Theology of Grace (South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974), 68.Google Scholar
30 ME, 106.
31 For similar examinations of the intrinsically diffusive and communicative character of being, see: Hemmerle, Klaus, Theses Towards a Trinitarian Ontology, trans. Churchyard, Stephen (Brooklyn: Angelico Press, 2020)Google Scholar; Ulrich, Ferdinand, Homo Abyssus, trans. Schindler, D. C. (Washington DC: Humanum Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
32 ME: 8.
33 PI, §151-155.
34 Cf Webster, John Bainbridge, ‘Theological Theology’, in Confessing God: Essays in Christian Dogmatics (London: T&T Clark, 2005), 11-32.Google Scholar
35 ME, 74. The logic of the ‘ordinary world’ is explored at ME, 142.
36 ME, 26.
37 See ME, 63-65.
38 ME, 64.
39 Rahner, Karl, ‘The Theology of the Symbol’, in Theological Investigations Vol 4 (1966), 221-52Google Scholar; Fields, Stephen M., Being as Symbol: On The Origins and Development of Karl Rahner's Metaphysics (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
40 ME, 84.
41 ME, 215.
42 ME, 32.
43 Przywara, Erich, Analogia Entis: Metaphysik (München: Kösel, 1932).Google Scholar
44 See ME, 32 and 13-27.
45 Ernst, Cornelius, ‘Metaphor and Ontology in Sacra Doctrina’, The Thomist 38(1974): 422-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Truth and Verification in Theology’, New Blackfriars 40, no. 468 (1959): 100-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Meaning and Metaphor in Theology’, New Blackfriars 61, no. 718 (1980): 100-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 ME, 64.
47 ME, 68.
48 ME, 67.
49 Chenu, Marie-Dominique, Nature, Man and Society in the Twelfth Century (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1968), 138.Google Scholar
50 ME, 71-74.
51 Ernst, Meaning and Metaphor.
52 As Boers puts it, developing the typology presented by Lakoff and Johnson, ‘ontological metaphors allow us to conceive of abstract concepts as concrete entities’, see: Spatial Prepositions and Metaphor (Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1996), 21Google Scholar. The literature on ‘ontological metaphors’ is now vast. See: Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2003), 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cazeaux, Clive, Metaphor and Continental Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2007), 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 See Williams, Donald C., ‘The Myth of Passage’, Philosophy 48, no. 15 (1951): 457-72.Google Scholar
54 Tugwell, Simon, ‘Cornelius Ernst OP’, New Blackfriars 59(1978): 2-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Nichols, Aidan, ‘Catholic Theology in Britain’, online: http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/anichols/theolog1.htmlGoogle Scholar
56 Hill, Edmund, ‘Cornelius Ernst OP: Multiple Echo’, Fergus Kerr, OP and OP, Timothy Radcliffe (eds.),” The Thomist 46, no. 4 (1982): 631-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Slaby, Jan, ‘Ontic’, in The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, ed. Wrathall, Mark A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), 542-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 White, Victor, Holy Teaching: The Idea of Theology According to St. Thomas Aquinas (London: Blackfriars Publications, 1958).Google Scholar
59 ME, 151. Graham Ward has recently developed an account of theology as ‘engaged systematics’. Ernst would have had considerable sympathy with Ward's proposals, but would avoid, given his understanding of Aquinas as a thematic thinker, have preferred not to deploy the term ‘systematics’. ‘Contemplation’ more precisely evokes the perspective of meaning that Ernst is seeking to develop. Ward's proposals, meanwhile, are embedded within the first volume of his systematics (something Ernst's sporadic approach to writing could not have sustained). See: Ward, Graham, How the Light Gets In (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
60 Ernst's notion of ‘servanthood of the Word’ has been taken up into the 2016 Edition of the Order of Preachers’ Ratio Formationis Generalis.
61 For an exploration of these themes, see: Kotva, Simone, Effort and Grace: On the Spiritual Exercise of Philosophy (London: Bloomsbury, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62 ME, 152.
63 Torrell, Jean-Pierre, St Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work, trans. Royal, Robert (Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996), 142-59Google Scholar; See also: Boyle, Leonard E., ‘The Setting of the Summa Theologiae’, in Aquinas's Summa Theologiae: Critical Essays, ed. Davies, Brian (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006), 1-24.Google Scholar
64 This point has been made forcefully by Candler, Peter M., Theology, Rhetoric, Manuduction: Or Reading Scripture Together on the Path to God, Radical Traditions (London: SCM Press, 2006).Google Scholar
65 On qq. 1 and 2 of the prima pars, see: Kerr, Fergus, After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism (Oxford: Blackwells, 2002), 52-72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bauerschmidt, Frederick Christian, Thomas Aquinas: Faith, Reason and Following Christ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 41-82, 91-106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Preller, Victor, Divine Science and the Science of God (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967), 108-79Google Scholar; Kerr, Fergus, ‘Real Knowledge or ‘Enlightened Ignorance: Eric Mascall on the Apophatic Thomisms of Victor Preller and Victor White’, in Grammar and Grace, ed. Stout, Jeffrey and MacSwain, Robert (London: SCM Press, 2004), 103-23.Google Scholar
66 ME, 9.
67 ME, 7-8.
68 Chenu, Marie-Dominique, ‘Le plan de la somme théologique de saint Thomas’, Revue Thomiste 47(1939): 93-107.Google Scholar
69 The connection between sanctification, theosis and the discipline of theology has been articulated by Ryan, Fáinche, Formation in Holiness: Thomas Aquinas on Sacra Doctrina (Utrecht: Thomas Instituut/Peeters Leuven, 2007)Google Scholar; Williams, Anna Ngaire, ‘Deification in the Summa theologiae: A Structural Interpretation of the Prima Pars’, The Thomist 61, no. 2 (1997): 219-55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
70 Cf., ME, 121.
71 Bird, Otto, ‘How to Read an Article of the Summa’, New Scholasticism 27, no. 2 (1953): 129-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 Egan, Authentic Philosophy, 224-26.
73 PI, §464.
74 ME, 108.
75 ME, 79.
76 ME, 149-157.
77 ME, 76-86, particularly 85.
78 For an examination of this theme from a phenomenological perspective, see: DeLay, Steven, Before God: Exercises in Subjectivity (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar
79 ME, 85.
80 ME, 85.
81 ME, 84.
82 Zaretsky, Robert, The Subversive Weil. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021): Ch. 2.Google Scholar
83 CD III/3: 477.
84 ME, 198.
85 ME, 199.
86 ME, 201.
87 ME, 27-28, 79.