Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:43:32.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual Difference, Animal Difference: Derrida and Difference “Worthy of Its Name”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

I challenge the age-old binary opposition between human and animal, not as philosophers sometimes do by claiming that humans are also animals, or that animals are capable of suffering or intelligence, but rather by questioning the very category of “the animal” itself. This category groups a nearly infinite variety of living beings into one concept measured in terms of humans—animals are those creatures that are not human. In addition, I argue that the binary opposition between human and animal is intimately linked to the binary opposition between man and woman. Furthermore, I suggest that thinking through animal differences or differences among various living creatures opens up the possibility of thinking beyond the dualist notion of sexual difference and enables thinking toward a multiplicity of sexual differences.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Kelly Oliver

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armour, Ellen. 1997. Crossing the boundaries between deconstruction, feminism, and religion. In Feminist interpretations of Derrida, ed. Holland, Nancy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 193214.Google Scholar
Berger, Anne‐Emmaneulle. 2005. Sexing differance. Differances: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 16 (3): 5267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, Joel. 2007. When damsels don't need knights. National Geographic, March 2007: 23.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, John. 1997. Dreaming of the innumerable: Derrida, Drucilla Cornell, and the dance of gender. In Derrida and feminism, eds. Feder, Ellen, Rawlinson, Mary, and Zakin, Emily. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1997. On not reading Derrida's texts. In Derrida and feminism, eds. Feder, Ellen, Rawlinson, Mary, and Zakin, Emily. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. 2005. Obscure gifts: On Jacques Derrida. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 16 (3): 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1986. Glas. Trans. John P. Leavey Jr. and Richard Rand. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1987. Geschlecht II: Heidegger's hand. In Deconstruction and philosophy: The texts of Jacques Derrida, ed. Sallis, John. Trans. John P. Leavey Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1990. Women in the beehive: A seminar with Jacques Derrida. In Discourses, eds. Ferguson, Russell, et al. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1991. Choreographies. In A Derrida reader, ed. Kamuf, Peggy. Trans. Ruben Bevezdivin. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 440456.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Fourmis. In Lectures de la différence sexuelle, ed. Negròn, Mara. Paris: Des Femmes.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2002. The animal that therefore I am (more to follow) Trans. David Wills. Critical Inquiry 28 (2): 369418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Rogues. Trans. Pascale‐Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2006. L'animal que donc je suis. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1979. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1997. Ontology and equivocation: Derrida's politics of sexual difference. In Feminist interpretations of Derrida, ed. Holland, Nancy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2005. Derrida and feminism: A remembrance. In Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 16 (3): 8894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, Lisa. 2005. “Alterity and Indifference: Encountering the Other with Levinas and Lispector,” Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (SPEP) Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 20–22 October.Google Scholar
Holland, Jennifer. 2007. A worm's world. National Geographic: 122.Google Scholar
Holland, Nancy. 1997. Introduction. In Feminist interpretations of Derrida, ed. Holland, Nancy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This sex which is not one. Trans. Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kamuf, Peggy, ed. 1991. A Derrida reader: Between the blinds. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1986. The paradox of morality: An interview with Emmanuel Levinas. Trans. Andrew Benjamin and Tamra Wright. In The provocation of Levinas, eds. Bernasconi, Robert and Wood, David. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 1995. Womanizing Nietzsche: Philosophy's relation to the feminine. New York: Routledge, pp. 3757.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2004. The colonization of psychic space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2007 Tropho‐ethics: Derrida's homeopathic purity. The Harvard Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlinson, Mary. 1997. Levers, signatures, and secrets: Derrida's use of woman. In Derrida and feminism, eds. Feder, Ellen, Rawlinson, Mary, and Zakin, Emily. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1977. Glas‐piece. Diacritics 7 (3): 2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2005. Notes toward a tribute to Jacques Derrida. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 16 (3): 102113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, Julia. 2007. In 93 years, half of all life on earth will be extinct. So what? Mother Jones 3645, 88.Google Scholar