Stopping the Anthropological Machine: Agamben with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v2i2.236Keywords:
Deconstruction, Continental Philosophy, Animals, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger, Agamben, animal, anthropocentrism, scienceAbstract
Agamben maintains that Heidegger continues the work of the anthropological machine by defining Dasein as uniquely open to the closedness of the animal. Yet, Agamben’s own thinking does not so much open up the concept of animal as it attempts to save humanity from the anthropological machine that always produces the animal as the constitutive outside within the human itself. Agamben’s return to religious metaphors at best displaces the binary man-animal with the binary religion-science, and at worst returns us to a discourse at least as violent as the one from which he is trying to escape. Merleau-Ponty’s reanimation of science provides an alternative.Downloads
Published
2007-12-14
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright for an article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to PhaenEx. By virtue of its appearance in this Open Access Journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes. Reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author. The author agrees to use proper citation of PhaenEx as the original source whenever s/he later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms. ISSN: 1911-1576
Articles in PhaenEx are available under a Creative Commons Attribution License.