Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T16:13:15.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Dorothea E. Olkowski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luce Irigaray is often cited as the principle feminist who adheres to phenomenology as a method of descriptive philosophy. A different approach to Irigaray might well open the way to not only an avoidance of phenomenology's sexist tendencies, but the recognition that the breach between Irigaray's ideas and those of phenomenology is complete. I argue that this occurs and that Irigaray's work directly implicates a Bergsonian critique of the limits of phenomenology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , Summer 2000 , pp. 73 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Anna 1997. The eclipse of gender: Simone de Beauvoir and the différence of translation. Philosophy Today 41(1): 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1970. Metaphysics. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed.McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1945. La phénoménologie de la perception de Maurice Merleau‐Ponty. Les Temps Modernes 1(2): 363–67.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans.Frechtman, B.New Yotk: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1972. The second sex. Trans.Parshley, H. M.New York: Knopf, 1952. Reprint, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri 1959. Bergson oeuvres. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri 1988. Matter and memory. Trans.Paul, N. M. and Palmer, W. S.New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith P. 1989. Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: A feminist critique of Merleau‐Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. In The thinking muse: Feminism and modern French philosophy, ed.Allen, Jeffner and Young, Iris Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith P. 1993. Bodies that matter:On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina 1995. The ethics of eros. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles 1968. Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles 1994. Difference and repetition. Trans.Patton, Paul. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira 1996. Imaginary bodies. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1994. Volatile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1999. Merleau‐Ponty and Irigaray in the flesh. In Merleau‐Ponty, interiority and exteriority, psychic life and the world, ed.Olkowski, Dorothea E. and Morley, James. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hass, Marjorie 2000. Thinking fluids/fluid thinking: Irigaray's critique of formal logic. In Feminist interpretations of logic, ed.Hass, Marjorie and Falmagne, Rachel Joffe. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1984. Éthique de la différence sexuelle. Paris: Les editions de minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans.Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans.Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans.Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1993b. Je, tu, nous: Toward a culture of difference. Trans.Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Mazis, Glen 1996. Matter, dream, and the murmurs among things. In Merleau‐Ponty: Difference, materiality, painting, ed.Foti, Veronique. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1962. The phenomenology of perception. Trans.Smith, Colin. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1964. Le visible et l'invisible. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1968. The visible and the invisible. Trans.Lingis, Alphonso. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1973. The prose of the world. Trans.O'Neill, John. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Olkowski, Dorothea 1987. Merleau‐Ponty: The demand for mystery in language. Philosophy Today 31(4): 252–58.Google Scholar
Olkowski, Dorothea 1997. Kolossos: The measure of a man's cize. In Feminist interpretations of Jacques Derrida, ed.Holland, Nancy. State College: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Olkowski, Dorothea 1999. Gilles Deleuze and the ruin of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gail 1992. Context and perspective. In Merleau‐Ponty: Hermeneutics and postmodernism, ed.Busch, Thomas and Johnson, Galen. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 1989. “Throwing like a girl”: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility, and spatiality. In The thinking muse: Feminism and modern French philosophy, ed.Allen, Jeffner and Young, Iris Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar