Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T13:30:07.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The discussion of methodological limitations in number representation studies is incomplete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2009

Guy A. Orban
Guy A. Orban
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psycho-fysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Medical School, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. guy.orban@med.kuleuven
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) discuss the limitations of the behavioral, imaging, and single-cell studies related to number representation in human parietal cortex. The limitations of the imaging studies are grossly underestimated, particularly those using adaptation paradigms, and the problem of establishing a link between single-cell studies and imaging is not even addressed. Monkey functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), however, provides a solution to these problems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diester, I. & Nieder, A. (2007) Semantic associations between signs and numerical categories in the prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biology 5(11):e294;2684–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durand, J. B., Peeters, R., Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T. & Orban, G. A. (2009) Parietal regions processing visual 3D shape extracted from disparity. Neuroimage 46:1114–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgieva, S., Peeters, R., Kolster, H., Todd, J. T. & Orban, G. A. (2009) The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 29(3):727–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grefkes, C. & Fink, G. R. (2005) The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. Journal of Anatomy 207:3–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krekelberg, B., Boynton, G. M. & van Wezel, R. J. (2006) Adaptation: From single cells to BOLD signals. Trends in Neuroscience 29(5):250–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T. & Oeltermann, A. (2001) Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412:150–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelissen, K., Vanduffel, W. & Orban, G. A. (2006) Charting the lower superior temporal region, a new motion-sensitive region in monkey superior temporal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience 26(22):5929–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orban, G. A. (2002) Functional MRI in the awake monkey: The missing link. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(6):965–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D. C. & Vanduffel, W. (2004) Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(7):315–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2):109–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D. & Dehaene, S. (2004) Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron 44(3):547–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawamura, H., Orban, G. A. & Vogels, R. (2006) Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 49(2):307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirotin, Y. B. & Das, A. (2009) Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity. Nature 457(7228):475–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanduffel, W., Fize, D., Mandeville, J. B., Nelissen, K., Van, H. P., Rosen, B. R., Tootell, R. B. & Orban, G. A. (2001) Visual motion processing investigated using contrast agent-enhanced fMRI in awake behaving monkeys. Neuron 32(4):565–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Essen, D. C. (2004) Organisation of visual areas in macaque and human cerebral cortex. In: The visual neurosciences, vol. 1, ed. Chalupa, L. M. & Werner, J. S., pp. 507–21. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Verhoef, B. E., Kayaert, G., Franko, E., Vangeneugden, J. & Vogels, R. (2008) Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent. The Journal of Neuroscience 28(42):10631–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed