No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Art History in Japan and Its Future Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Commencing with the argument that modern art history is rooted in fifteenth- and early six-teenth-century Italy, a period of unusual primacy for the ‘eye’, the author provides an over-view of the history of art history: from its foundation as a university discipline to its recent bipolarity. In the 1980s art history devolved into a state of confusion. At the same time, con-noisseurship, a primary and indispensable foundation for training in art history, went into decline. This state of affairs resulted from the penetration of the language-based disciplines into the realm of art historical study, since their approaches are not predicated upon direct access to the art object. Counter to this trend, however, the author argues that art history is a humanistic discipline that begins with the careful viewing of an individual work of art or visual object, and works outward toward the building up of a historical, geographical and worldwide map of art.
A close examination of the limitations of a globally-oriented approach (that is, world art studies or world art history) and a regionally-oriented practice that could be categorized as a traditional form of art history, leads the author to consider the future of art history in Japan. He proposes a comparative approach as a promising way of bridging Western and Japanese art history, as practiced both inside and outside Japan, in future years.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2012
References
Agosti, G (1996) La nascita della storia dell’arte in Italia: Adolfo Venturi dal museo all’università 1880–1940. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Anderson, J (1987) “Giovanni Morelli et sa définition de la ‘scienza dell’arte’,” Revue de l’art 75: 49–55.Google Scholar
Barasch, M (2000) Theories of Art, t. 1: From Plato to Winckelmann. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M (1972) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Bellosi, L (1982) “‘Castrum pingatur in palatio’, 2. Duccio e Simone Martini pittori di castelli senesi ‘a l’esemplo come erano’,” Prospettiva 28: 41–65.Google Scholar
Bialostocki, J (1982) “Comparative Art History of World Art, Is It Possible?” in Vayer, L (ed.) Actes du 24e Congrès international d’histoire de l’art, t. 10, pp. 207–216. Bologna: Alfa.Google Scholar
Bologna, F (1988) “Conclusioni (e proposte),” in Bellosi, L (ed.) Simone Martini: atti del convegno (Siena 27, 28, 29 marzo 1985), pp. 239–252. Florence: Centro Di.Google Scholar
Burke, P (1999) The Italian Renaissance. Culture and Society in Italy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burke, P (2001) Eyewitnessing. The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Dahl, E (1978) “Heavenly Images: the Statue of St. Foy of Conques and the Significance of the Medieval ‘Cult-Image’ in the West,” Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia, VIII: 175–191.Google Scholar
Ebitz, D (1988) “Connoisseurship as Practice,” Artibus et Historiae 9(18): 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenollosa, E F (1898) “The Present Exhibition of Paintings,” The Japan Weekly Mail, Nov 12: 487–490.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C (1983) “Clues: Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes,” in Eco, U, Sebeok, T A (eds) Dupin, Holmes, Peirce: The Sign of Three. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C (1994) Indagini su Piero: Il Battesimo, il ciclo di Arezzo, la Flagellazione di Urbino. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E (1960) Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E (1979) The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Hatt, H, Klonk, C (2006) Art History: A Critical Introduction to its Methods. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP.Google Scholar
Inaga, S (2007) “Is Art History Globalizable? A Critical Commentary from a far Eastern Point of View,” in Elkins, J (ed.) Is Art History Global? pp. 249–279. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kultermann, U (1966) Geschichte der Kunstgeschichte. Der Weg einer Wissenschaft. Wien-Düsseldorf: Econ.Google Scholar
Mallory, M, Moran, G (1986) “New Evidence Concerning ‘Guidoriccio’,” The Burlington Magazine, CXXXIII-997: 250–259.Google Scholar
Martindal, A (1986) “The Problem of ‘Guidoriccio’,” The Burlington Magazine, CXXXIII-997: 259–273.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S B (2009) “Golden Flesh, Radiant Bones. The Unity of Relic and Reliquary in Medieval Perception,” in Akiyama, A, Tomizawa, K (eds) The Interrelationship of Relics and Images in Christian and Buddhist Culture, Bulletin of Death and Life Studies 5, pp. 59–74 and 112–115. Tokyo: Global COE Program, Tokyo University.Google Scholar
Moran, G, Mallory, M (1981–1982) “Guido Riccio Da Fogliano: A Challenge to the Famous Fresco Long Ascribed to Simone Martini and Discovery of a New One in the Palazzo Pubblico in Siena,” Studies in Iconography 7–8: 1–13.Google Scholar
Moran, G (1977) “An Investigation Regarding the Equestrian Portrait of Guido Riccio da Fogliano in the Siena Palazzo Pubblico,” Parag. 333: 83–88.Google Scholar
Moran, G (1981–1982) “Guido Riccio da Fogliano: A Controversy Unfolds in the Palazzo Pubblico in Siena,” Studies in Iconography 7–8: 14–20.Google Scholar
Onians, J (2007) Neuroarthistory. From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. New Haven and London: Yale UP.Google Scholar
Onians, J (2008) “Neuroarthistory as world art history,” Unpublished paper delivered at the symposium “Possibilities of world art history” (世界美術史の可能性) on the occasion of the 61st Annual Congress of the Japan Art History Society held at the University of Tokyo on May 30.Google Scholar
Osano, S (2003) “L’inferno di Genshin e Dante: una proposta per una storia dell’arte comparata,” in Osano, S (ed.) Visioni dell’aldilà in Oriente e Occidente: Arte e pensiero. Atti del convegno di Firenze (2003) 21st Century COE Program: “Construction of Death and Life Studies Concerning Culture and Value of Life,” pp. 135–166. Tokyo: 三元社.Google Scholar
Pacioli, L (1509) Divina Proportione, illustrated by Leonardo da Vinci. Venice: A. Pagani.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M (1968) “The Still Life as Personal Object – A Note on Heidegger and Van Gogh,” in Simmel, M L (ed.) The Reach of Mind. Essays in Memory of Kurt Goldstein, pp. 203–209. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G (1988) “Connoisseurship: The Penalty of Ahistoricism,” Artibus et Historiae 9(18): 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, M (1982) “‘Castrum pingatur in palatio’, 1. Ricerche storiche e iconografiche sui castelli dipinti nel Palazzo Pubblico di Siena,” Prospettiva 28: 17–41.Google Scholar
Summers, D (2003) Real Spaces. World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Torriti, P (1988) “La parete del Guidoriccio,” in Bellosi, L (ed.) Simone Martini: atti del convegno (Siena 27, 28, 29 marzo 1985), pp. 87–95. Florence: Centro Di.Google Scholar
Tsuji, N (1986) Playfulness in Japanese Art. Lawrence: Spencer Museum of Art, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Wagner, A, ed. (2004) Les Saints et l’histoire: sources hagiographiques du haut Moyen Âge. Rosny-sous-Bois: Bréal.Google Scholar
Zerner, H (1978) “Giovanni Morelli and la science de l’art,” Revue de l’art 41: 209–215.Google Scholar