Abstract
A satisfactory sociology of markets requires that both order and disorder in markets be addressed, yet sociologists have seemed more concerned with theorizing market stability and order. Change, however, is too fundamental a part of markets to receive so little sociological attention. One perspective that provides a fertile ground for moving ahead with developing an agenda for studying both stability and change in markets is American pragmatist social theory. This article therefore examines the influence of a pragmatist viewpoint on two broad modern theoretical approaches that have implications for the sociology of markets, one focused on stabilization processes, the other on institutional designs for promoting change. Most particularly, it draws on work carried out from a pragmatist viewpoint and illustrates a pragmatic approach to change in markets using the case of the EU’s Forest, Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) action plan and initiative.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Arendt, H. (1958). The modern condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barry, A., & Slater, D. (2002). The technological economy. Economy & Society, 31, 175–193.
Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 38(3), 245–269.
Berk, G., & Galvan, D. (2009). How people experience and change institutions: a field guide to creative syncretism. Theory and Society, 38, 543–580.
Beunza, D., & Garud, R. (2007). Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts. In M. Callon, Y. Millo, & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Market devices. Malden: Blackwell.
Bhargava, V. K. (2006). Global issues for global citizens: An introduction to key development challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Biggart, N. W., & Beamish, T. D. (2003). The economic sociology of conventions: habit, custom, practice and routine in market order. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 443–464.
Bohman, J. (1999). Citizenship and norms of publicity: wide public reason in cosmopolitan societies. Political Theory, 27(2), 176–202.
Brack, D. (2005). Controlling illegal logging and the trade in illegally harvested timber: the EU’s forest law enforcement, governance and trade initiative. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 14(1), 28–38.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, M. (1997). Actor-network theory: the market test. Paper presented at the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. Lancaster, UK. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology//papers/Callon-Market-Test.pdf
Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. London: Blackwell Publishers.
Callon, M. (2005). Why virtualism paves the way to political impotence: a reply to Daniel Miller’s critique of The laws of the markets. European Electronic Sociology Newsletter, 6(2), 3–20.
Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.
Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217.
Callon, M., Millo, Y., & Muniesa, F. (2007). Market devices. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Callon, M., Barhte, Y., & Lascoumes, P. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT.
Christiansen, C. (1997). The innovators’ dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. F. (1997). Directly-deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), 313–340.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (1958) [1925]. Experience and nature. New York: Dover.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Dorf, M., & Sabel, C. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.
Environmental Investigation Agency. (2005). The last frontier: illegal logging in Papua and China’s massive timber theft. London: EIA.
Environmental Investigation Agency. (2008). Buyer beware: An investigation into merbau wood flooring sales in the UK. London: EIA.
European Commission (2004). Proposal for a council regulation concerning the establishment of a voluntary FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber in the European Community. Brussels, 20.7.2004 COM(2004) 515 final. 2004/0173.
European Commission (2007a). Market participant based legality assurance and FLEGT licensing. Briefing Note Number 08, Series 2007, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2007b). What is legal timber? FLEGT Briefing Notes Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade. Briefing Note Number 02, Series 2007, Brussels: European Commission.
Fern (2008). Cautious optimism as first VPA is signed in Ghana. Press Release 03.09.08. Available at http://www.fern.org/media/documents/document_4259_4260.doc
Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19, 105–125.
Garcia-Papet, M. -F., (2007). The social construction of a perfect market: The strawberry auction at Fontaines-en-Sologne. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.). Do economists make markets? (pp 20–53). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 613–632.
Greenpeace. (2003). Partners in crime: A Greenpeace investigation of the links between the UK and Indonesia’s timber barons. London: Greenpeace.
Gross, M. (2009). Ignorance and surprise: Science, society, and ecological design. Cambridge: MIT.
Guala, F. (2007). How to do things with experimental economics. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Herrigel, G. (2008). Roles and rules: ambiguity, experimentation and new forms of stakeholderism in Germany. Industrielle Beziehungen, 15. Jg., Heft 2, 111–132.
Holm, P., & Nielsen, K. N. (2007). Framing fish, making markets: The construction of individual transferable quotas (ITQs). In M. Callon, Y. Millo, & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Market devices. Malden: Blackwell.
Horowitz, I. L. (1964). The intellectual genesis of C. Wright Mills. In C. Wright Mills (Ed.), Sociology and pragmatism: The higher learning in America. New York: Paine-Whitman.
ITTO (2009). Tropical Timber Market Reports. October 2004 and February 2006. http://www.itto.int/en/mis_back_issues Last Retrieved March 5, 2009.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge: Polity.
Kishor, N., & Damania, R. (2007). Crime and justice in the Garden of Eden. Improving governance and reducing corruption in the Forestry Sector. In J.E. Campos and S. Pradhan (Eds.), The many faces of corruption. Tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 89–114.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lezaun, J. (2007). A market of opinions: The political epistemology of focus groups. In M. Callon, Y. Millo, & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Market devices. Malden: Blackwell.
MacKenzie, D. (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge: MIT.
Mackenzie, D. (2009). Material markets: How economic agents are constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 107–145.
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., & Siu, L. (2007). Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Ed. by C.W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
OECD (2007). The Economics of Illegal Logging and Associated Trade SG/SD/RT(2007) Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Olsson, O. (2006). Diamonds are a rebel’s best friend. World Economy, 29(8), 1133–1150.
Overdevest, C. (2010). Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Special issue on law and legitimacy in transnational governance. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 47–76.
Peirce, C. S. (1992). The fixation of belief. In C. S. Peirce, N. Houser, & C. J. W. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. I, pp. 109–123). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Fraser’s the works of George Berkeley. In C. S. Peirce, N. Houser, & C. J. W. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. II, pp. 83–105). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Poon, M. (2007). Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: The case of Fair Isaac & Company Incorproated. In M. Callon, Y. Millo, & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Market devices. Malden: Blackwell.
Sabel, C. F. (2006). A real time revolution in routines. In C. Heckscher & P. Adler (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community (pp. 106–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European Union. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Sun, X., Cheng, N., & Canby, K. (2005). China’s forest product exports: An overview of trends by segment and destinations. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
Swedberg, R. (2004). What has been accomplished in New Economic Sociology and where is it heading? European Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 317–330.
Whitford, J. (2002). Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory and Society, 31(3), 325–363.
World Bank (2006). Strengthening forest law enforcement and governance: strengthening a systemic constraint to sustainable development. Report No. 36638-GLB. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
WRI (2005). Bearing witness: empowering Indonesian communities to fight illegal logging. In The World Resources 2005: The Wealth of the Poor, pp. 139–144). Washington, DC: WRI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overdevest, C. Towards a more pragmatic sociology of markets. Theor Soc 40, 533–552 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9149-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9149-1