Abstract
Can there be rules of language which serve both to determine meaning and to guide speakers in ordinary linguistic usage, i.e., in the production of speech acts? We argue that the answer is no. We take the guiding function of rules to be the function of serving as reasons for actions, and the question of guidance is then considered within the framework of practical reasoning. It turns out that those rules that can serve as reasons for linguistic utterances cannot be considered as normative or meaning determining. Acceptance of such a rule is simply equivalent to a belief about meaning, and does not even presuppose that meaning is determined by rules. Rules that can determine meaning, on the other hand, i.e., rules that can be regarded as constitutive of meaning, are not capable of guiding speakers in the ordinary performance of speech acts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Black, M.: 1962, 'The Analysis of Rules', in M. Black (ed.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Davidson, D.: 1963, 'Actions, Reasons and Causes', Journal of Philosophy 60, reprinted in D. Davidson, Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1980. Page references are to the 1980 edition, pp. 3–19.
Davidson, D.: 1984, 'Communication and Convention', in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 265–280.
Glüer, K.: 1997, Ist Bedeutung Normativ? Versuch Über eine Sprachphilosophische These, doctoral dissertation, Humboldt University of Berlin.
Midgley, G. C. J.: 1959, 'Linguistic Rules', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIX, 271–290.
Pagin, P.: 1987, Ideas for a Theory of Rules, doctoral dissertation, preprint from Stockholm University.
Rawls, J.: 1955, 'Two Concepts of Rules', The Philosophical Review 64, 3–32.
Raz, J.: 1990, Practical Reason and Norms, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Schnädelbach, H, 1990, 'Rationalität und Normativität', in: K. O. Apel and R. Pozzo (eds.), Zur Rekonstruktion der praktischen Philosophie, Stuttgart.
Searle, J.: 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, London.
Schwayder, D.: 1965, The Stratification of Behaviour, Humanities Press, New York.
von Wright, G. H.: 1963, Norm and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1974, in Rhees (ed.), Philosophical Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glüer, K., Pagin, P. Rules of Meaning and Practical Reasoning. Synthese 117, 207–227 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005162503125
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005162503125