Recognizing Young People’s Civic Engagement Practices: Rethinking Literacy Ontologies through Co-Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v13i1.1950Keywords:
literacy, media, youth, civic enagement, participation, informal and communityAbstract
In this article I argue that it is important to find a language to describe youth engagement practices in informal settings. I argue that many young people do not have the resources to be heard on visible platforms, but their work, and meaning making practices might provide important information about their ideas and relay key concepts about how communicational practices are constructed. Drawing on embedded, ethnographic and artistically informed projects with young people in communities, I argue for a deeper kind of listening. Artistic forms such as poetry, visual art, dance and music are important modes of engagement. I draw on cultural practice theory together with theory from new literacy studies and media studies to explore four questions:
- How do you craft what you know?
- How do you speak/make what you feel?
- How do you transform practice?
- How do you articulate action?
I see these as components of the process of producing relationally oriented modes of address that others can also engage with. Taken together, they suggest a language of description for the mode that is civic engagement communicational practice, that is, oriented beyond individual experience but drawing from experience to make change happen in relational ways.
References
Back, L. (2007). The art of listening. London: Berg.
Banks, S., Hart, A., Pahl, K., & Ward, P. (Eds.). (2019). Co-producing research: A community development approach. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
Batsleer, J., Anderson, B., Lijeholm-Hanssen, S., Lutgens, J., Mengilli, Y., Pais, A., Pohl, A., & Wisso, T. (2017). Non-formal spaces of socio-cultural accompaniment: Responding to young unaccompanied refugees – reflections from the Partispace project. European Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 305-322.
Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope. Volume 1. (Plaice, N., Plaice, S., & Knight, P., Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Boggs, G. L., Duarte, R., & Manglitz, J. (2017). Orality as cultural action – Contributions to literacy. Writing & Pedagogy, 9(1), 21-47.
Bright. G. (2016). ‘The lady is not returning!’: Educational precarity and a social haunting in the UK coalfields. Ethnography & Education, 11(2), 142-157.
Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2015). Doing ethnography today. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Campbell, E., Pahl, K., Pente, E., & Rasool, Z. (2018). Re-imagining contested communities: Connecting Rotherham through research. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Coessens, K., Crispin, D., & Douglas, A. (2009). The artistic turn: A manifesto. Ghent, BE: The Orpheus Institute.
Comber, B. (2016). Literacy, place and pedagogies of possibility. London: Routledge.
Compton-Lilly, C. F. (2010). Considering time in the field of family literacy and in the lives of families. In K. Dunsmore & D. Fisher (Eds.), Bringing Literacy Home (pp. 306-331). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
Corcoran, S. (2010). Editor’s introduction. In J. Ranciere (Ed.), Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics (Corcoran, S., Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 1-26). London: Continuum Press.
Dahya, N. (2017). Critical perspectives on youth digital media production: ‘Voice’ and representation in educational contexts. Learning, Media & Technology, 42(1), 100-111.
Daniel, J. O. & Moylan, T. (Eds.). (1997). Not yet: Reconsidering Ernst Bloch. London: Verso.
Ehret, C. (2018). Moments of teaching and learning in a children’s hospital: Affects, textures, and temporalities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 49(1), 53-71.
Ellsworth E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Escott, H., & Pahl, K. (2017). Learning from Ninjas: Young people’s films as a lens for an expanded view of literacy and language. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13pp. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1405911
Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living knowledge: The connected communities programme, community-university partnerships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
Facer, K., & Pahl, K. (Eds.). (2017). Valuing collaborative interdisciplinary research: Beyond impact. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Finnegan, R. (2007). The ‘oral’ and beyond: Doing things with words in Africa. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, A. (1997). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Greene, M. (Ed.). (1995/2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hauge, C. & Bryson, M. (2014). Youth media and agency. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(4), 210-230.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, arts and education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2009). Literacy, media and morality: Making the case for an aesthetic turn. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 199-228). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Hull, G. A., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sahni, U. (2010). Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 43, 331-367.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2016). Girls, camera, (intra)action: Mapping posthuman possibilities in a diffractive analysis of camera-girl assemblages in research on gender, corporeality and place. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 168-185). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Ivinson, G., Thompson, I., Beckett, L., Egan, D., Leitch, R., & McKinney, S. (2018). Learning the price of poverty across the UK. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 130-143.
Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, 1997-2013. Rotherham, UK: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council. Retrieved from www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham
Jenson, J., Dahya, N., & Fisher, S. (2014). Valuing production values: A ‘do it yourself’ media production club. Learning, Media & Technology, 39(2), 215-228.
Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Searle, K. A. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532-556.
Kinloch, V. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race and the literacies of urban youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2016). Go be a writer!: Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. New York: Teachers College Press.
Larson, J., & Moses G. H. (Eds.). (2018). Community literacies as shared resources for transformation. New York: Routledge
Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Massumi. B. (2011). Semblance and event. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridgge, MA: MIT Press.
McDonnell, J. (2018). Is it ‘all about having an opinion’? Challenging the dominance of rationality and cognition in democratic education via research in a gallery setting. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(2), 233-243.
Morrell, E. (2017). Towards equity and diversity in literacy research, policy, and practice: A critical, global approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(3), 454-463.
Nelson, M. E., Hull, G., & Young, R. (2013). Portrait of the artist as a younger adult: Multimedia literacy and ‘effective surprise’. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 215-232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nirantar Collective (2007). Exploring the everyday: Ethnographic approaches to literacy and numeracy. New Delhi, IN: Nirantar.
Pahl, K. (2012). Time and space as a resource for meaning-making by children and young people in home and community settings. Global Studies of Childhood, 2(3), 201-216.
Pahl, K. (2014). Materializing literacies in communities: The ‘uses of literacy’ revisited. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Pahl, K., & Crompton, M. (2018). Introducing Rotherham. In E. Campbell, E. Pente, K. Pahl & Z. Rasool (Eds.), Re-imagining contested communities (pp. 17-27). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Pahl, K., & Khan, A. (2015). Artifacts of resilience: Enduring narratives, texts, practices across three generations. In J. Sefton-Green & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Learning and literacy over time: Longitudinal perspectives (pp. 116-133). London: Routledge.
Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2011). ‘Living your life because it’s the only life you’ve got’: Participatory research as a site for discovery in a creative project in a primary school in Thurnscoe, UK. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 17-37.
Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2018). Re-imagining artistic subjectivities within community projects. Open Library of Humanities, 4(2), 1-22.
Pool, S., & Pahl, K. (2015). The work of art in the age of mechanical co-production. In D. O'Brien & P. Mathews (Eds.), After urban regeneration: Communities policy and place (pp. 79-94). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital media, culture and education: Theorising third space literacies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Ranciere, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. ( S. Corcoran, Trans. & Ed.). London: Continuum.
Rasool, Z. (2017). Collaborative working practices: Imagining better research partnerships. Research for All, 1(2), 310-322.
Ravetz, J., & Ravetz, A. (2016). Seeing the wood from the trees: Social Science 3.0 and the role of visual thinking. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science, 30, 104-120.
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality. London: Routledge.
Stewart K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Stornaiuolo, A., & Jung, J. K. (2017). Public engagement and digital authoring: Korean adolescents write for/as action. In R. Zaidi & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Literacy lives in transcultural times (pp. 102-116). New York: Routledge.
Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Phillips, N. (2017). Developing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 68-91
Street, B. V. (Ed.). (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Trafi-Prats, L. (2015). Reactivating ARTIUM’s collection: The time-image and its mode of address as prosthetic pedagogy in museums. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(6), 575-588.
Tuck, E. (2010). Breaking up with Deleuze: Desire and valuing the irreconcilable. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 635-650.
Tuhiwai Smith, L., Tuck, E., & Wang, W. K. (2019). Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education: Mapping the long view. New York: Routledge.
Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘being and becomings’: Children, childhood and temporality. Children & Society, 22, 303-313.
Vasudevan, L. (2011). An invitation to unknowing. Teachers College Record, 113(6), 1154-1174.
Williams, R. (1980/2005). Culture and materialism. London: Verso.
Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wissman, K. K., Staples, J. M., Vasudevan, L., & Nichols, R. E. (2015). Cultivating research pedagogies with adolescents: Created spaces, engaged participation, and embodied inquiry. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 46(2), 186-197.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
