Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agricultural debt restructuring, accounting, and public policy: A study of the Farmers Home Administration

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Federal credit policies toward agriculture reflect the human values of maintaining the farm production sector largely as an industry characterized by small-scale, family farms. The Farmers Home Administration has implemented various credit programs designed to carry out this policy objective. As a result of the prolonged financial crisis in the farm economy, the agricultural community is becoming more aware of the controversies surrounding the mission of FmHA and its debt restructuring program. This paper discusses the debt restructuring program administered by the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), as authorized by the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, and amended by the recently enacted Farm Bill of 1990. It discusses the key provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act authorizing FmHA to establish a debt restructuring and debt forgiveness program aimed at achieving the public policy objective of keeping financially stressed farmers in business, whenever possible.

In the course of reviewing the restructuring program, FmHA officials and congressional committees reviewed the FmHA's mission and its program implementation. This review indicated that several unintended negative consequences resulted from several abuses stemming from inadequate administrative mechanisms and controls and conflicting legislative objectives of debt forgiveness and federal tax policy. In enacting the 1990 Farm Bill, Congress sought to reorient FmHA's mission to a temporary source of credit and to eliminate various abuses associated with the implementation of FmHA's debt restructuring program. The 1990 Farm Bill reflects an effort by Congress to address some the controversies surrounding federal credit policies toward agriculture. Although Congress placed limits on debt restructuring, the overall public policy objective of maintaining a family-farm posture in the agricultural sector continues to be an important social value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Bankers Association,Transition in Agriculture: A Strategic Assessment of Agriculture and Banking. (Washington: American Bankers Association, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthick, A. Faye and Owen D. West, “Expert Systems — A New Tool for the Professional,”Accounting Horizons, Vol. 1, No. 1 (March, 1987), pp. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, Barry P., Andrew S. Carron, and Elisabeth H. Rhyne,The Economics of Federal Credit Programs (Washington: The Brookings Institutions, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowsher, Charles A., “The Federal Budget: Presenting and Facing the Facts,”Accounting Horizons, Vol.4, No. 2. (June, 1990), pp.96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office,New Approaches to the Budgetary Treatment of Federal Credit Assistance (March, 1984).

  • Cox, Clifford T., Harold M. Nix, and Henry Wichman, Jr., “Responsibility Accounting and Operational Control for Governmental Units,Accounting Horizons, Vol. 3, No. 2 (June, 1989), pp. 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, J. R. and R.S. Kaplan, “Empirical Analysis of the Commercial Loan Classification Decision,”The Accounting Review (January, 1982), pp. 18–38.

  • Elmer, Peter J. and David M. Borowski, “An Expert System Approach to Financial Analysis: The Case of S&L Bankruptcy,”Financial Management (Autumn, 1988), pp. 66–76.

  • Freeman, Robert J., Craig D. Shoulders, and Edward S. Lynn,Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting, Third Edition (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Governmental Accounting Standards Board,Codification of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards (Stamford, Conn.: Governmental Accounting Standards Board, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harl, Neil E., "The Architecture of Public Policy: The Crisis in Agriculture,"Kansas Law Review (Spring, 1985). pp. 425–456.

  • Hay, Leon E.,Accounting for Governmental and Nonprofit Entities, 8th Edition (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1989).

  • Hughes, Dean W. and Nancy K. Osborn, “Measuring Federal Credit Subsidies,”Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 47 (1987), pp. 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolita, Dennis S.,Hidden Spending: The Politics of Federal Credit Programs (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Neal Sox, Administrator, Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, and Rural Development, House Committee on Agriculture, January 25, 1990.

  • Lins, David A., “Credit Availability Effects On the Structure of Farming,” in U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report 438,Structure Issues Of American Agriculture (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, November, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melichar, Emanuel, "Agricultural Banks Under Stress,"Federal Reserve Quart. (July, 1986), pp. 437–448.

  • Pariser, David B., “Debt and Loan Restructuring System: An Innovative Use of EDP in Public Sector Financial Management,”Government Accountants Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2 (Summer, 1990), pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, “Farmer Mac: An Innovation in Agricultural Real Estate Finance,”Real Estate Finance, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Spring, 1989), pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, “Nine Credit Underwriting Standards for Farmer Mac,”Real Estate Finance, Vol. 6, No. 3 (Fall, 1989), pp. 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, “Agricultural Real Estate Loans and Secondary Markets,”Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. IV, Numbers 2 and 3 (Spring-Summer, 1987), pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse. “DALR$Testing Assistance,” Report Submitted to Farmers Home Administration (FmHA Contract No. 53-3157-9-14), February 10, 1989.

  • Shaw, Michael J. and James A. Gentry, “Using an Expert System With Inductive Learning To Evaluate Business Loans,”Financial Management (Autumn ,1988), pp. 45–56.

  • U.S. Congress, Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, Public Law 100-233, Jan. 6, 1988. 101 STAT. 1568.

  • --, Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Public Law 101-624, Nov. 28, 1990. 104 STAT. 3359.

  • ——,Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, OTA-F-285 (Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, March, 1986), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General,Farmers Home Administration: Audit of National Systems Application Programs (Jan. 23, 1990).

  • --,FmHA—Debt and Loan Restructuring System (DALR$) (February 24, 1989).

  • --, Office of Publishing and Visual Communications,1990 Farm Bill: Proposal of the Admistration (February, 1990).

  • U.S. Federal Register, “Farmers Home Administration: 7 CFR Parts 1809,et. al. Certain Provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 and Additional Amendments of Portions of Farmer Program Regulations; Interim Rule with Request for Comments,” Vol. 53, No. 178, Sept. 14, 1988 (Washington, D.C.: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration), pp. 35638–35765.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office,A Glossary Of Terms Used In the Federal Budget Process, Third Edition (Washington: Gen. Accounting Office, March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • --,Policy and Procedures Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, Title 2 — Accounting (October 31, 1984).

  • --,Policy and Procedures Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, Title 3 — Audit (October 31, 1984).

  • --,The Fianancial Condition of American Agriculture (October, 1985).

  • --,The Financial Condition of American Aghriculture as of Dec. 31, 1985 (Sept., 1985)

  • --,Financial Audit: Farmers Home Administration's Financial Statements for 1988 and 1987, GAO/AFMD-90-37 (January 25, 1990a).

  • --,Issues Surrounding the Role and Mission of the Farmers Home Administration's Farm Loan Programs, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, and Rural Development, House Committee on Agriculture, GAO/T-RCED-90-22 (January 25, 1990b).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Use of Loan Funds by Farmer Program Borrowers, GAO/RCED-90-95BR (February 8, 1990).

  • --,1990 Farm Bill: Opportunities for Change, GAO/RCED-90-142 (April 10, 1990).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Changes Needed in Loan Servicing Under the Agricultual Credit Act, GAO/RCED-90-169 (August 2, 1990).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Sounder Loans Would Require Revised Loan-Making Criteria, GAO/RCED-89-9 (February, 1989).

  • --,Budgetary Treatment of Federal Credit Programs, GAO/AFMD-89-42 (April, 1989).

  • --,Information Management: Issues Important to Farmers Home Administration Modernization (GAO/IMTEC-89-64, Augus,t 1989).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Implications of the Shift From Direct to Guaranteed Farm Loans, GAO/RCED-89-86 (Sept., 1989).

  • --,Managing the Cost of Government: Proposals for Reforming Federal Budgeting Practices, GAO/AFMD-90-1 (October, 1989).

  • --,Federal Credit and Insurance: Programs May Require Increased Federal Assistance in the Future, GAO/AFMD-90-11 (November 16, 1989).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Loan Servicing Benefits for Bad Faith Borrowers, GAO/RCED-90-77FS (November 29, 1989).

  • --,Government Auditing Standards: Standards for Audit of Government Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions (Revised, July, 1988).

  • --,Farmers Home Administration: Farm Loan Programs Have Become a Continuous Source of Subsidized Credit, GAO/RCED-89-3 (November, 1988).

  • --,Financial Audit: Farmers Home Administration's Losses Have Increased Significantly, GAO/AFMD-89-20 (December, 1988).

  • --,Agricultural Overview: U.S.Food/Agriculture in a Volatile World Economy(GAO/RCED-86-36BR, July, 1985).

  • U.S. House of Representatives,Adequacy of Federal Efforts to Combat Fraud, Abuse, and Misconduct in Federally Insured Financial Institutions, Hearings Before the Committee On Government Operations, 100th Congress, 1st Session, Nov. 19, 1987 (Washington: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • --,Conference Report to Accompany Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Report 101-916, October, 1990.

  • U.S. Senate,Implementation of the Agricultural Credit Act by the Farmers Home Administration, Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Agricultural Credit, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, 101st Congress, 1st Session, May 9, 1989.

  • --,Food, Agriculture,Conservation,andTrade Act of 1990,ReportoftheSenateCommittee on Agricultuare, Nutrition, and Forestry to Accompany S. 2820, 101st Congress, 2d Session, Report 101-357, July 6, 1990.

  • Vautour, Roland R., Under Secretary for Small Community and Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, and Rural Development, House Committee on Agriculture, January 25, 1990.”

  • --, “Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Agricultural Credit, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, March 5, 1990.”

Download references

Authors
  1. David B. Pariser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adolph A. Neidermeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

David B. Pariser, Ph. D., CPA, and Adolph A. Neidermeyer, Ph. D., are faculty members in the College of Business and Economics at the University of West Virginia, Morgantown. Their areas of reasearch interest include accounting and public policy, agricultuiral finance, taxation, and financial reporting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pariser, D.B., Neidermeyer, A.A. Agricultural debt restructuring, accounting, and public policy: A study of the Farmers Home Administration. Agric Hum Values 8, 56–71 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530655

Keywords

Search

Navigation