Skip to main content
Log in

Economics and technological change: An evolutionary epistemological inquiry

  • Feature Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge and Policy

Abstract

The failure of neoclassical economic theories to explain the nature and significance of the phenomenon of technological change is critically looked at in this article. Although there are numerous excellent works in the literature on technological change that criticize the inadequacy of neoclassical economists’ approach to this phenomenon, my objective, however, is to open a new discourse on technological change by emphasizing the epistemological significance of technology. It is argued that the concept of technology as essentially a process of knowledge created for doing things and solving problems, and technological change as essentially a process of knowledge change occurring within the contexts of the political economic and social constructivist frameworks that inform the dynamics of this essentially qualitative process can address this failure. Empirically based analytical methodologies may be able to measure the impact of technological change, an evolutionary epistemology of technological change may be better equipped to understand and explain this phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870. In Rosenberg, N. (Ed.). (1971).The Economics of Technological Change. Hammondsworth: Penguin, 320–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1982). The science-technology relationship: A model and a query.Social Studies of Science, 12, 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, J.J. (1965). The Historical Relations of Science and Technology.Technology and Culture, 6(4), 547–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1975). Technology, Nature, and Society. InThe Frontiers of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 27–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S.D. (1980). Informal R&D.Ceres, 13(4), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E., Pinch, T.S. & Hughes, T.P. (Eds.). (1987).Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. (1976). The Development of the Diesel Engine.Technology and Culture, 17(3), 432–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., Saviotti, P. & Walsh, V. (1987).Economics and Technological Change. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bresson, C. (1987a).Understanding Technological Change. Montreal-New York: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bresson, C. (1987b). The Evolutionary Paradigm and the Economics of Technological Change.Journal of Economic Issues, 21(2), 751–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1983).Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamser, M.S. (1988). Innovation, Technical Assistance, and Development: The Importance of Technology Users.World Development, 16(8), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1960). Hybrid Corn and the Economics of Innovation. Reprinted in Rosenberg, N. (Ed.), op. cit., (1971), 212–228.

  • Gunn, R. (1988). Marxism and Philosophy: A Critique of Critical Realism.Capital & Class, 37, 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1981).Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T.P. (1983).Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T.P. (1976). The Developmental Phase of Technological Change.Technology and Culture, 17(3), 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, R. (1984). Cognitive Change in Technology and Science. In Laudan R. (Ed.)The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1987). Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion. In Bijker, W.E. et al. (Eds.).The Social Construction of Technological Systems, op. cit.3, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, E.T. (1987). Through the Looking Glass, or News From Lake Mirror Image.Technology and Culture, 28, 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, E.T. (1974). Technology as Knowledge.Technology and Culture, 15(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation. In Rosenberg N. (Ed.). (1971), op.cit., 284–315.

  • Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G. (1982).An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parayil, G. (1992). The Green Revolution in India: A Case Study of Technological Change.Technology and Culture, 33(4), 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parayil, G. (1991a). Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change.Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 13, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parayil, G. (1991b). Technological Knowledge and Technological Change.Technology in Society, 13, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parayil, G. (1991c). Technology as Knowledge: An Empirical Affirmation.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Innovation, 13, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parayil, G. (1991d). In Search of a Practically Reflexive Category for Analyzing Technological Change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, November 15–18, Cambridge, MA.

  • Parayil, G. (1990). Development studies, a progressive research tradition.Science Studies, 3(2), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T.J. & Bijker, W.E. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. In Bijker, W.E., et al. (Eds.).Social Construction of Technological Systems, 17–50.

  • Price, de Solla D.J. (1965). Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography.Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. (1990). The Discourse of Exploitation and the Exploitation of Discourse.Alternatives, 15, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982).Inside the Blackbox: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976).Perspectives on Technology. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (Ed.) (1971).The Economics of Technological Change. Hammondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1969). The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices.Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. & Vincenti, W.G. (1978).The Britannia Bridge: The Generation and Diffusion of Technological Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987).On Ethics & Economics. Oxford & New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. In Rosenberg N., (Ed.), op. cit., (1971), 344–362.

  • Staudenmaier, J.M. (1985).Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1990).What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1984). Technological Knowledge without Science: The Invention of Flush Riveting in American Airplanes, ca. 1930–ca. 1950.Technology and Culture, 25, 540–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988).The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, G. (1985). Science and Technology.OSIRIS, 2nd series, 1, 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, S. (1988).Science, Technology, and Social Change. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He has previously taught at Illinois Institute of Technology and Virginia Tech.

An earlier version of this paper was presented in a seminar to the Industrial Policy Management Group at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad on November 2, 1992. Thanks are due to Steve Fuller for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parayil, G. Economics and technological change: An evolutionary epistemological inquiry. Knowledge and Policy 7, 79–91 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692817

Keywords

Navigation