No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL ALLUSIONS IN HOSIDIUS GETA'S MEDEA
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2024
Abstract
This article explores the allusive strategy of the late second-century cento-tragedy Medea attributed to Hosidius Geta, which recounts Medea's revenge against Jason using verses from the works of Virgil. It argues that the text's author recognized a consistent strand of characterization in earlier treatments of the Medea myth, whereby the heroine's filicide is presented as a corrupted sacrifice. Geta selectively uses verses from thematically significant episodes in the Aeneid—the lying tale of Sinon and the death of Laocoön; the murder of Priam; the suicide of Dido—at key points to foreground the theme of pseudo-sacrificial violence. Geta's use of Virgil evinces a keen appreciation both of the symbolism of the broader mythic tradition in which his text is situated and of the original narrative contexts of the verses he recycles. The article's findings contribute to a growing recognition of the creative potential afforded by the cento technique.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association
Footnotes
I am grateful to Professor Matthew Leigh, Dr Matthew Robinson and CQ's reader.
References
1 Rondholz, A., The Versatile Needle: Hosidius Geta's Cento Medea and its Tradition (Berlin and Boston, 2012), 82–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Rondholz (n. 1), 14, 84–9.
3 McGill, S., Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity (Oxford, 2005), xviiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 For discussions of modes of intertextuality in Latin poetry, see Conte, G.B., The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets (Ithaca, NY, 1986)Google Scholar; Fowler, D., ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39 (1997), 13–34Google Scholar; Hinds, S., Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry (New York, 1997)Google Scholar; Edmonds, L., Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry (Baltimore, 2001)Google Scholar.
5 Herzog, R., Die Bibelepik der lateinischen Spätantike. Formgeschichte einer erbaulichen Gattung (Munich, 1975), 12–51Google Scholar.
6 McGill (n. 3), passim.
7 Pelttari, A., The Space that Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity (Ithaca, NY, 2014), 97–8Google Scholar.
8 Pelttari (n. 7), 98–103.
9 Except for a three-line segment in Petronius (Sat. 132.11).
10 S.J. Harrison, ‘Cento’, in OCD 4; Rondholz (n. 1), 24–7.
11 McGill, S., ‘Tragic Vergil: rewriting Vergil as a tragedy in the cento Medea’, CW 95 (2002), 143–61, at 145Google Scholar.
12 Lamacchia, R., ‘Dall'arte allusiva al centone’, A&R 3 (1958), 193–216Google Scholar; Rondholz (n. 1), 107–43.
13 Cullhed, S. Schottenius, Proba the Prophet: The Christian Virgilian Cento of Faltonia Betitia Proba (Leiden and Boston, 2015), 141–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Schottenius Cullhed (n. 13), 150–4.
15 Allan, W., Euripides: Medea (London, 2002), 91Google Scholar.
16 Burkert, W., ‘Greek tragedy and sacrificial ritual’, GRBS 7 (1966), 97–121, at 118Google Scholar.
17 Pache, C.O., Baby and Child Heroes in Ancient Greece (Urbana, IL and Chicago, 2004), 32Google Scholar.
18 L. Richardson, Jr., ‘Pompeii: the Casa dei Dioscuri and its painters’, MAAR 23 (1955), 1–165, Plate LIV; Pache (n. 17), 37–8, fig. 10.
19 McDermott, E.A., Euripides’ Medea: The Incarnation of Disorder (University Park, PA, 1989), 75–6Google Scholar.
20 Zeitlin, F.I., ‘The motif of the corrupted sacrifice in Aeschylus’ Oresteia’, TAPhA 96 (1965), 463–508Google Scholar.
21 Ov. Trist. 3.9.9; Sen. Med. 395; Sen. Ag. 119–20; Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica 5.686; Cul. 249.
22 Atlakviða 34–7 and Atlamál in Grœnlenzko 74–5, in U. Dronke (ed. and transl.), The Poetic Edda I: Heroic Poems (Oxford, 1969), 10–11 and 92; and see C. Larrington, ‘“I have long desired to cure you of old age”: sibling drama in the later heroic poems of the Edda’, in P. Acker and C. Larrington (edd.), Revisiting the Poetic Edda: Essays on Old Norse Heroic Legend (New York and Abingdon, 2013), 140–56.
23 E. Schwartz (ed.), Scholia in Euripidem, 2 vols. (Berlin, 1891), 2.211; J.N. Bremmer, ‘Why did Medea kill her brother Apsyrtus?’, in J.J. Claus and S.I. Johnston (edd.), Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art (Princeton, NJ and Chichester, 1997), 85.
24 See Leigh, M., ‘Boxing and sacrifice: Apollonius, Vergil, and Valerius’, HSPh 105 (2010), 117–55Google Scholar, at 128–9 for intratextual links between this episode and the earlier killing of Amycus by Polydeuces (Ap. Rhod. Argon. 2.90–6).
25 Griffiths, E., Medea (London and New York, 2006), 57Google Scholar.
26 J.T. Dyson, King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid (Norman, 2001); B. Gladhill, ‘The poetics of human sacrifice in Vergil's Aeneid’, in P. Bonnechere and R. Gagné (edd.), Sacrifices humains: perspectives croisées et representations (Liège, 2013), 217–45.
27 I use the text of R.A.B. Mynors (ed.), P. Vergili Maronis opera (Oxford, 1969).
28 Dyson (n. 26), 112–24, 210–27; Nicoll, W.S.M., ‘The death of Turnus’, CQ 51 (2001), 190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Cf. S. Farron, ‘Aeneas’ revenge for Pallas as a criticism of Aeneas’, AClass 29 (1986), 69–83.
29 Bandera, C., ‘Sacrificial levels in Virgil's Aeneid’, Arethusa 14 (1981), 217–39Google Scholar, at 235–6; Smith, R.M., ‘Deception and sacrifice in Aeneid 2.1–249’, AJPh 120 (1999), 503–21Google Scholar.
30 Caes. BGall. 6.16; Cic. Rep. 3.15, Font. 31, Pis. 16, Flac. 95–6; Tac. Ann. 14.30. Farron, S., ‘Aeneas’ human sacrifice’, AClass 28 (1985), 21–33Google Scholar, at 23–4; Schulz, C.E., ‘The Romans and ritual murder’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (2010), 516–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar discusses how the Romans reconciled this aversion with their own observance of rituals requiring human deaths.
31 N. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary (Leiden, 2002), 200–2.
32 Aldrete, G.S., ‘Hammers, axes, bulls, and blood: some practical aspects of Roman animal sacrifice’, JRS 104 (2014), 28–50Google Scholar examines the logistics of controlling large bovines at the moment of slaughter, and ideological demands that sacrificial victims should appear compliant.
33 Hardie, P.R., ‘The sacrifice of Iphigeneia: an example of “distribution” of a Lucretian theme in Vergil’, CQ 34 (1984), 406–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 407–8.
34 Farron (n. 30), 22–3.
35 R.J. Sklenář, ‘The death of Priam: Aeneid 2. 506–558’, Hermes 118 (1990), 67–75, at 67; Horsfall (n. 31), 391.
36 Bowie, A.M., ‘The death of Priam: allegory and history in the Aeneid’, CQ 40 (1990), 470–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 473–4.
37 Bowie (n. 36), 474–81; Horsfall (n. 31), 417–23.
38 I use the text of R. Lamacchia (ed.), Hosidii Getae Medea: Cento Vergilianus (Leipzig, 1981).
39 Rondholz (n. 1), 115.
40 Rondholz (n. 1), 115.
41 Rondholz (n. 1), 117–18, who notes that Medea's deceit is also conveyed through allusions to the speech of Drances in Aeneid Book 11, in which he opposes Turnus out of personal envy.
42 Rondholz (n. 1), 126.
43 Rondholz (n. 1), 128.
44 Leigh (n. 24), 130–1.
45 For discussion of Geta's metre, see Lamacchia, R., ‘Metro e ritmo nella Medea di Osidio Geta’, Stud. Ital. 30 (1958), 175–206Google Scholar; Rondholz (n. 1), 91–5. Geta differentiates between spoken passages and choral song, using hexameter lines for the former and paroemiacs for the latter. Whilst some spoken verses are not perfect hexameters where Geta has prioritized content over scansion, his imperfect hexameters none the less approximate the hexameter line, making the hypometric verses conspicuous.
46 Rondholz (n. 1), 142–3.