Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation

@article{ART002495419},
author={ 박삼열 },
title={Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation},
journal={철학탐구 },
issn={1598-7213},
year={2019},
volume={55},
pages={173-195},
doi={10.33156/philos.2019.55..006},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.33156/philos.2019.55..006}

TY - JOUR
AU - 박삼열
TI - Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation
T2 - 철학탐구
PY - 2019
VL - 55
IS -
PB - 중앙대학교 중앙철학연구소
SP - 173-195
SN - 1598-7213
AB - One of the popular interpretations of Spinoza’s mind-body theory is parallelism. Parallelism is based on the distinction between the mind and the body which results from the distinction between the attributes of thought and extension. I shall describe the general outlook of the traditional parallelistic interpretation and compare it with Spinoza’s parallelism, in order to show how Spinoza’s theory differs from the former position. I shall explore Bennett’s more sophisticated arguments in which parallelism can seem to entail identity of mind and body. The main issue I shall consider is the problems of the parallelistic interpretation by appeal to the identity of the mind and the body.
KW - Spinoza, Bennett, Mind, Body, Parallelism, Identity
DO - 10.33156/philos.2019.55..006
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.33156/philos.2019.55..006
ER -

박삼열 (2019). Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation. 철학탐구 , 55, 173- 195.

박삼열 . 2019, “Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation”, 철학탐구 , vol. 55, pp. 173-195. Available from: doi:10.33156/philos.2019.55..006

박삼열 “Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation” 철학탐구 55 pp. 173-195 (2019): 173.

박삼열 . Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation 철학탐구 [Internet]. 2019; 55 : 173-195. Available from: doi:10.33156/philos.2019.55..006

박삼열 . “Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation” 철학탐구 55 (2019): 173-195. doi: 10.33156/philos.2019.55..006

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

Spinoza and Parallelistic Interpretation

철학탐구

약어 : -

2019, vol.55, pp.173 - 195

DOI : 10.33156/philos.2019.55..006

발행기관 : 중앙대학교 중앙철학연구소

연구분야 : 철학

박삼열¹

¹숭실대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 2 서지 간략 보기

초록

One of the popular interpretations of Spinoza’s mind-body theory is parallelism. Parallelism is based on the distinction between the mind and the body which results from the distinction between the attributes of thought and extension. I shall describe the general outlook of the traditional parallelistic interpretation and compare it with Spinoza’s parallelism, in order to show how Spinoza’s theory differs from the former position. I shall explore Bennett’s more sophisticated arguments in which parallelism can seem to entail identity of mind and body. The main issue I shall consider is the problems of the parallelistic interpretation by appeal to the identity of the mind and the body.

키워드

Spinoza, Bennett, Mind, Body, Parallelism, Identity

참고문헌(12)

[단행본] R. H. M. Elwes / 1883 / The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza. 2 vols / Chiswick Press
[단행본] Edwin Curley / 1985 / The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. 1 / Princeton University Press
[단행본] A. Wolf / 1966 / The Correspondence of Spinoza. 2 vols / Frank Cass
[단행본] James Gutmann / 1949 / Ethics / Hafner Press
[단행본] Samuel Shirley / 1995 / The Letters / Hackett Publishing Company
[단행본] Carl Gebhardt / 1925 / Spinoza Opera. 4 vols / Carl Winter
[단행본] Bennett, Jonathan / 1984 / A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics / Cambridge University Press
[단행본] Curley, Edwin M. / 1988 / Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics / Princeton University Press
[학술지] Friedman, J. I. / 1983 / Spinoza’s Problem of ‘Other Minds’ / Synthese 56 : 99 ~ 126
[단행본] Hubbeling, H. G. / 1964 / Spinoza's Methodology / van Gorcum
[단행본] Rocca, M. D. / 1996 / Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza / Oxford University Press
[단행본] Shaffer, Jerome / 1968 / Philosophy of Mind / Prentice-Hall