Abstract
To study Earth’s climate, scientists now use a variety of computer simulation models. These models disagree in some of their assumptions about the climate system, yet they are used together as complementary resources for investigating future climatic change. This paper examines and defends this use of incompatible models. I argue that climate model pluralism results both from uncertainty concerning how to best represent the climate system and from difficulties faced in evaluating the relative merits of complex models. I describe how incompatible climate models are used together in ‘multi-model ensembles’ and explain why this practice is reasonable, given scientists’ inability to identify a ‘best’ model for predicting future climate. Finally, I characterize climate model pluralism as involving both an ontic competitive pluralism and a pragmatic integrative pluralism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Bailer-Jones (2000) ArticleTitleModelling Extended Extragalactic Radio Sources Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 49–74 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1355-2198(99)00028-3
A. Dai T.M.L. Wigley B.A. Boville J.T. Kiehl L.E. Buja (2001) ArticleTitleClimates of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model Journal of Climate 14 485–519 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0485:COTTAT>2.0.CO;2
P.N. Edwards (2000) A Brief History of Atmospheric General Circulation Modeling D.A. Randall (Eds) General Circulation Development, Past Present and Future: The Proceedings of a Symposium in Honor of Akio Arakawa Academic Press New York 67–90
J.R. Holton (1992) Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology Academic Press San Diego, CA
J.T. Houghton L.G Meira Filho B.A. Callender N. Harris A. Kattenberg K. Maskell (Eds) (1996) Climate Change 1995: The Scientific Basis Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
J.T. Houghton Y. Ding D.J. Griggs M. Noguer P.J. Linden Particlevan der (Eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
E. Kalnay M. Kanamitsu R. Kistler W. Collins D. Deaven L. Gandin M. Iredell S. Saha G. White J. Woollen Y. Zhu M. Chelliah W. Ebisuzaki W. Higgins J. Janowiak K.C. Mo C. Ropelewski J. Wang A. Leetmaa R. Reynolds R. Jenne D. Joseph (1996) ArticleTitleThe NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77 437–471 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
S. Lambert G. Boer (2001) ArticleTitleCMIP1 Evaluation and Intercomparison of Coupled Climate Models Climate Dynamics 17 83–106 Occurrence Handle10.1007/PL00013736
S.D. Mitchell (2002) ArticleTitleIntegrative Pluralism Biology and Philosophy 17 55–70 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1012990030867
N. Oreskes K. Belitz (2001) Philosophical Issues in Model Assessment M.G. Anderson P.D. Bates (Eds) Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science Wiley & Sons Chichester 23–41
S. Shackley I. Risbey P. Stone B. Wynne (1999) ArticleTitleAdjusting to Policy Expectations in Climate Change Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Use of Flux Adjustments in Coupled A/O GCMs Climatic Change 43 413–454 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005474102591
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parker, W.S. Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling. Found Sci 11, 349–368 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3196-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3196-x