Impact of social, institutional and ecological factors on land management practices in mountain watersheds of Nepal
Introduction
There is very high population pressure on land resources in developing countries due to small landholdings and dwindling quality of agricultural lands (Lefroy, Bechstedt, & Rais, 2000). The mountains of Nepal are not an exception where the degradation of land resource base and declining crop yields has been a major challenge to attain food security for farming communities (Keatinge, Wheeler, Subedi, Shah, Ellis and Summerfield, 1999, Paudel, 2001). Particularly in the middle mountains, hereafter referred to as the hills, a typical farm household possesses an average landholding size of about 0.75 ha and yields of rice, wheat, maize and millet range from 1 to 2.3 ton/ha (DA, 1999). Such very low crop yield is attributed primarily to dwindling soil fertility (Tuladhar, 1994). Being aware of the possible threat of food shortage arising from diminishing landholdings, hill farmers have adopted several strategies for securing their livelihood (Blaikie, 1985). Traditionally, expansion of agricultural land into forests and rangelands has been the most popular strategy. Nowadays there is very limited scope for this, owing to the location of most existing forests and rangelands in steep slopes and increasing government and local community restriction on encroachment of these resources. The overwhelming majority of Nepalese hill farmers have, therefore, resorted to land use intensification as an alternative strategy for sustaining their livelihoods. Being concerned about possible adverse effects of land use intensification on crop yield, hill farmers have adopted several biological and structural measures of land management ranging from terrace construction to agroforestry, though the degree of adoption of such measures varies from one farm household to another (Thapa & Weber, 1990). Despite this, farmlands in the hills of Nepal are undergoing degradation, as for some reasons farmers have not been able to manage them effectively (Fleming, 1983, Thapa, 1996, Thapa and Paudel, 2002).
Agriculture is the economic mainstay of the overwhelming majority of hill people in Nepal and will continue to remain so in the near future in view of very slow pace of economic development. However, the on-going land degradation has threatened undermining the sustenance of their livelihood. To prevent such possible situation, it is essential to enable hill farmers to expand and adopt more effective conservation measures by implementing appropriate land conservation programs. Any effort towards this direction should begin from a research that aims at exploring location specific factors influencing the adoption of land management practices. Findings of such research will be helpful for devising appropriate policies and programs conducive to promotion of land management. Realizing such need, this research was carried out in two small watersheds located in the Western Development Region of Nepal (Fig. 1). For two and half decades, farmers in Phewatal watershed were provided with external support such as extension services and subsidy for terrace improvement, so as enabling them to manage land resources effectively. While farmers in the Yamdi-Mardi watershed could not get such external support for land management. Selection of these two watersheds with distinct variation in terms of access to external support was inspired by our interest in, besides others, knowing about the impact of such support on adoption of land management practices, which bears very important policy relevance for sustainable land conservation. As elsewhere (Ervin & Ervin, 1982), we expected adoption of more measures of land management in Phewatal watershed, because of farmers’ access to information and necessary support.
Section snippets
Factors influencing the adoption of land management practices: conceptual perspectives
As to why farmers’ land management practices vary from one place to another or from one farm household to another has been a matter of constant concern for researchers, policymakers and planners. Depending on concerned individuals’ academic background, professional area of concern and degree of exposure to land management issues, several explanations have been offered. Some of the explanations are very narrow, focused on a specific or few factors. For example, Boserup, 1965, Geertz, 1963 and
Study area
The study area comprising the Phewatal and Yamdi-Mardi watersheds extends over an area of 23,270 ha (Fig. 1). The climate is monsoon type, with annual average rainfall ranging from 3811 mm at 827 m amsl (above mean sea level) to 5237 mm at 1740 m amsl. Annual mean temperature in the valley floor is 21 °C, with monthly means ranging from 13 °C in January to 26 °C in July. The temperature decreases gradually from the valley floor to the ridge. Mean temperature on the ridge is recorded to be 16
Prediction of the models
Independent variables (X1,…,X10, Table 2), which had strong correlation with the adoption of land management technologies (Y), were entered step by step in the regression model. All variables included in the model have significantly influenced the adoption of technologies (Table 3).
Both multiple R and R squared values have increased with the addition of independent variables from X1 to X10 (Table 3), and they have reasonable explanatory power in the models. The final model, with 10 independent
Discussion
Results of the regression analysis indicate that the adoption of land management technologies in the study area is influenced by several institutional, social and ecological factors. The following sections explain how these factors have influenced the adoption of land management technologies.
Conclusion
Being concerned about the vulnerability of lands to degradation and its adverse impact on their economic condition, farmers in the study area have adopted assorted types of land management technologies. The degree of adoption of technologies varies from one farmer to another, depending on several ecological, social and institutional factors. The specific factors significantly influencing the adoption of technologies are extension service, farmers’ caste affiliation, agricultural labor force
Acknowledgements
Funding support for the research was provided by the Asian Institute of Technology, International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), CARE Nepal and the Research Council of Norway. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to all these institutions. We are grateful to Associate Professor Jonathan Shaw, Language Proficiency Center, Asian Institute of Technology for kindly editing the draft manuscript. Thanks are extended to two anonymous referees for their very constructive
References (45)
Population pressure, environmental constraints and agricultural changes in Bangladesh: Examples from three agroecosystems
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
(1995)- et al.
Farm management and protection of natural resources: Analysis of adoption process and dependence relationship
Agricultural Systems
(1997) Socio-economic pressure, environmental loading and technological change in agriculture
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(1997)- et al.
Indictors for sustainable land management based on farmers surveys in Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(2000) - et al.
Economic incentives for farmers in the Philippine uplands to adopt hedgerow inter-cropping
Journal of Environmental Management
(1998) - et al.
Adoption of improved land use technologies to increase food security in Burkina Faso: Relating animal traction productivity and non-farm income
Agricultural System
(1998) Economic indicators to assess the sustainability of conservation farming project: An evaluation
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(1996)Land use, land management and environment in a subsistence mountain economy in Nepal
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(1996)- et al.
Farmers adaptability of mucana fallowing and agroforestry technologies in coastal Savana Benin
Agricultural System
(1998) - et al.
Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southeast Cameron
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(2000)