Abstract
In his book, Five Minds for the Future (2006), Howard Gardner offers both a constructive critique of current educational practices and an alternative vision for the future of education. Gardner, best known for his seminal work on multiple intelligences, grounds his major conclusions primarily on the results of his impressive, decade-long, and massive Good Works Project. Despite my several agreements and significant overlap with Howard Gardner, I believe that there is insufficient evidence to accept fully his policy prescriptions. Gardner’s selection of the five minds of the future – the disciplined, synthesizing, creating, respectful, and ethical minds – is based on a set of limiting assumptions concerning globalization, good work, individuality, power and control, disciplines as value-free enterprises, ethics as the point of view of the universe, and the completeness of his list. This paper suggests that our conception of education might be dramatically expanded to include a more critical and distanced stance towards: globalization, the current goals of business, individualism, the traditional disciplines, and even ethics than Gardner currently imagines. Its aims can and should be broadened to include not only good work, but also love and play. Students must learn how to control their environments, but also how to appreciate and accept life’s inevitable difficulties and limits. Ethics should certainly play a more central role in education as Gardner correctly emphasizes, but our understanding of ethics must include not only respect but also care; not only principles but also dialog. To accomplish all of this, however, requires us to think beyond Gardner’s five minds to include additional “mental dispositions” like the caring, critical, intersubjective, spiritual, and joyful minds. Each of these “minds” is explored in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, L., A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis, (Hillsdale: Analytic Press, 1996)
Benhabib, S., Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. (New York: Routledge, 1992)
Benjamin, J., Two-way Streets: Recognition of Difference and the Intersubjective Third. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2006, pp. 116–146
Buber, M., 1958, I and Thou, (New York: Macmillan)
Burch, K. T., Eros as the Educational Principle of Democracy, (New York: Peter Lang, 2000)
Dennett, D. C., Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, (New York: Viking, 2006)
Elkind, D.: ‹The Hidden Power of Play’, The Boston Globe, October 9, 2006, retrieved at http://www.boston.com
Eldind, D., The Power of Play: How Spontaneous Imaginative Activities Lead to Happier Healthier Children, (Cambridge: De Capo Press, 2007)
Fischman W., B. Solomon, D. Greeenspan, H. Gardner, Making Good: How Young People Cope with Moral Dilemmas at Work, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004)
Freeman R. E., The Politics of Stakeholder Theory, Business Ethics Quaterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1994, pp. 409–422
Friedman M.: 2002, Martin Buber and Dialogical Psychotherapy, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 7–36
Gardner, H., Five Minds for the Future, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006)
Gardner, H., ed., Responsibility at Work, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007)
Gardner H., M. Csikszentmihalyi, W. Damon, Good Work: When Excellence and Ethics Meet, (New York: Basic Books, 2001)
Hofstadter, D., I am a Strange Loop, (New York: Basic Books, 2007)
Kabat-Zinn, J., Coming to Our Senses: Healing Ourselves and the World Through Mindfulness, (New York: Hyperion, 2005)
Kegan, R., The Evolving Self: Problem and Process of Human Development (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982)
Lev, B., An Information Disclosure Strategy, California Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1992, pp. 9–32
Mead, G. H., On Social Psychology, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956)
Mitchell, S. A., Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity, (Hillsdale: Analytic Press, 2000)
Pava, M. L., Spirituality In (and Out) of the Classroom: A Pragmatic Approach, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.73, No. 3, 2007, pp. 287–290
Sacks, J., To Heal a Fractured World: The Ethics of Responsibility, New York: Schocken, 2007
Simola, S. K., The Pragmatics of Care in Sustainable Global Enterprise, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 74, 2007, pp. 131–147
Tronto, J. C., Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care, (New York: Routledge, 1993)
Walzer, M., Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004)
Wheatley, M. J., Turning to One Another: Simple Conversation to Restore Hope to Future, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehller Publishers, Inc., 2002)
Winnicott D. W., Playing and Reality, (New York: Brunner-Routledge, 1971)
Wrye, H. K. W., Sitting with Eros and Psych on a Buddhist Psychoanalyst’s Cushion, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, (Vol. 16, No. 6, 2006, pp. 725–746)
Young, I. M., Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philisophy, and Policy, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pava, M.L. ‹Loving the Distance Between Them:’ Thinking Beyond Howard Gardner’s “Five Minds for the Future”. J Bus Ethics 83, 285–296 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9619-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9619-6