Skip to main content
Log in

Whose Boundary? An Individual Species Perspectival Approach to Borders

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding ecological boundaries is recognized by ecologists as important for understanding ecosystem dynamics. All borders are borders in relation to some organism. However, much of the literature on habitat change ignores this basic ecological fact. In addition, borders are highly influenced by accidental or historical features of ecosystems, and researchers have in many cases defined them only in terms of convenience. Several viewpoints explored in this article reflect this skepticism about identifying ecosystems as real structured entities. I draw on Ghiselin’s (1974) hypothesis that species are not natural kinds but individuals, to develop a relational approach to ecological boundaries. I argue that with regard to ecology a border is always a border for a specific organism, and is a border in a specific manner for that organism. I draw on studies of two species of tsetse fly found in the Mauhoun river basin in Burkina Faso to illustrate why this relational approach is important. This approach may also help identify weaknesses in conservation efforts that have not properly asked the question, “Boundary for what?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attrill MJ, Rundle SD (2002) Ecotone or ecocline: Ecological boundaries in estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 929–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham E (2001) Ecological boundaries as community boundaries: The politics of watersheds. Society and Natural Resources 14: 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyer J, Ravel S, Dujardin J-P, De Meeüs T, Vial L, Thévenon S, Guerrini L, Sidibé I, Solano P (2007a) Population structuring of Glossina palpalis gambiensis (Diptera: Glossinidae) according to landscape fragmentation in the Mouhoun river, Burkina Faso. Journal of Medical Entomology 44: 788–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyer J, Sana Y, Samandoulgaou Y, Cesar J, Guerrini L, Kabor-Zoungrana C, Dulieu D (2007b) Identification of ecological indicators for monitoring ecosystem health in the trans-boundary W Regional park: A pilot study. Biological Conservation 138: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Weathers KC, Bell SS, Benning TL, Carreiro MM, Dawson TE (2003) An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries. BioScience 53: 717–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper GJ (2003) The Science of the Struggle for Existence: On the Foundations of Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Roos AM, Persson L (2005) Unstructured population models: Do population-level assumptions yield general theory? In: Ecological Paradigms Lost: Routes of Theory Change (Cuddington K, Beisner B, eds), 31–62. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Fortin M-J, Eacute, Soykan C (2003) Integrating edge detection and dynamic modeling in quantitative analyses of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53: 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini L, Bord JP, Ducheyne E, Bouyer J (2008) Fragmentation analysis for prediction of suitable habitat for vectors: The example of riverine tsetse flies in Burkina Faso. Journal of Medical Entomology 45: 1180–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (2005) Edge effects of an invasive species across a natural ecological boundary. Biological Conservation 121: 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P (2004) Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and the Scientific Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jax K (2006) Ecological Units: Definitions and Applications. Quarterly Review of Biology 81: 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaver IJ (2007) Boundaries on the edge: Boundary explorations in ecological theory and practice. In: Nature’s Edge (Brown CS, Toadvine T, eds), 113–132. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kone N, Meeus TD, Bouyer J, Ravel S, Guerrini L, N’Goran EK, Vial L (in press) (Diptera: Glossinidae) according to landscape fragmentation in the Mauhoun River Basin, Burkina Faso. Journal of Medical Entomology.

  • Laurance WF, Didham RK, Power ME (2001) Ecological boundaries: A search for synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 70–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leak SGA (1998) Tsetse Biology and Ecology: Their Role in the Epidemiology and Control of Trypanosomosis. Wallingford, UK: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood D (2008) When logic fails ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 83: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Wintle BA (2007) The boundary-quality penalty: A quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection. Conservation Biology 21: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenbaugh J (2005) The “structure” of population ecology: Philosophical reflections on unstructured and structured models. In: Ecological Paradigms Lost: Routes of Theory Change (Cuddington C, Beisner B, eds), 63–77. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker TH, Stansberry BM, Dustin Becker C, Gipson PS (2005) Edge and area effects on the occurrence of migrant forest songbirds. Conservation Biology 19: 1157–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavri F (2007) Remapping land use: Remote sensing, institutional approaches, and landscape boundaries. In: Nature’s Edge (Brown CS, Toadvine T, eds), 133–143. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck SL (2004) Simulation as experiment: A philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 530–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck SL (2008) The hermeneutics of ecological simulation. Biology and Philosophy 23: 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1991) A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 491–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS, McCoy ED (1993) Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2005) Made by each other: Organisms and their environment. Biology and Philosophy 20: 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2006) Local ecological communities. Philosophy of Science 73: 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Power ME, Fagan WF, Pickett STA, Belnap J (2003) A classification of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53: 723–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Gascon C (2005) Lessons from fragmentation research: Improving management and policy guidelines for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 19: 734–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven L. Peck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peck, S.L. Whose Boundary? An Individual Species Perspectival Approach to Borders. Biol Theory 4, 274–279 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.274

Keywords

Navigation