Skip to main content
Log in

Akrasia, Dispositions And Degrees

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that the recent revival of theakrasia problem in the philosophy of mind is adirect, albeit unforeseen result of the debate onaction explanation in the philosophy of science. Asolution of the problem is put forward that takesaccount of the intimate links between the problem ofakrasia and this debate. This solution is basedon the idea that beliefs and desires have degrees ofstrength, and it suggests a way of giving a precisemeaning to that idea. Finally, it is pointed out thatthe solution captures certain intuitions of bothSocrates and Aristotle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, translated by W. D. Ross, revised by J. O. Urmson, in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M.: 1987, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1936–1937, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3(4), 1936, 420–71, and 4(1), 1937, 432–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, W.: 1988, Weakness of Will, Blackwell, Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1981, ‘Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 317–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1969, ‘How Is Weakness of the Will Possible?’, in Joel Feinberg (ed.), Moral Concepts, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Mental Events’, in L. Foster and J. W. Swanson (eds), Experience and Theory, Duckworth, London. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 207–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1976, ‘Hempel on Explaining Action’, reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 261–276.

  • Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reprinted with corrections: 1982, 1985, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1982, ‘Paradoxes of Irrationality’, in R. Wollheim and J. Hopkins (eds), Philosophical Essays on Freud, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1985a, ‘Deception and Division’, in E. LePore and B. P. McLaughlin (eds), pp. 138–48.

  • Davidson, D.: 1985b, ‘Incoherence and Irrationality’, Dialectica 39(4), 345–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1985c, ‘Replies’, in B. Vermazen and M. B. Hintikka (eds), Essays on Davidson. Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Paperback 1986, pp. 195ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1987, ‘Problems in the Explanation of Action’, in P. Pettit et al. (eds), Metaphysics and Morality. Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart, Basil Blackwell, Oxford/New York, pp. 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1993, ‘Thinking Causes’, in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds), pp. 3–17.

  • Dennett, D.: 1987, The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London, reprint 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dray, W.: 1957, Laws and Explanation in History, Clarendon Press, Oxford, reprint 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeden, F. van: 1892, Johannes Viator, W. Versluys, Katwijk aan Zee: Servire, Amsterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evnine, S.: 1991, Donald Davidson, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S.: 1994, Irrationality and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R.: 1970, ‘Powers’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21, pp. 81–101. Reprinted in R. Tuomela (ed.), Dispositions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978, pp. 211–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, J. and A. Mele (eds): 1993, Mental Causation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1961–1962, ‘Rational Action’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 25, The Antioch Press, Yellow Springs, OH, pp. 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, The Free Press, Glencoe, Il, paperback edition 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J.: 1980–1981, ‘Which Physical Events Are Mental?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J.: 1985, ‘Physicalism, Events and Part-Whole Relations’, in E. LePore and B. P. McLaughlin (eds), pp. 444–58.

  • Inwood, B.: 1985, Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.: 1984, ‘Weakness of Will’, Mind 93, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W.: 1901–1902, ‘The Divided Self, and the Process of its Unification’, Lecture VIII of The Gifford Lectures delivered at Edinburgh 1901–1902. Published in: W. James, The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. With an introduction by A. D. Nock, London/Glasgow: 1960, reprint 1971, pp. 172–93.

  • Kim, J.: 1993, ‘Can Supervenience and “Non-Strict Laws” Save Anomalous Monism?’, in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds), pp. 19–26.

  • LePore, E. and B. P. McLaughlin (eds): 1985, Actions and Events. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, paperback edition 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, B.: 1978, Men of Ideas. Some Creators of Contemporary Philosophy, Series of BBC-interviews with philosophers, Jolly and Barker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R.: 1987, Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception, and Self-Control, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R.: 1992, Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behaviour, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, G. (ed.): 1971, Weakness of Will, Macmillan, London/Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenburg, J.: 1995, ‘Hempel's Rationality. On the Empty Nature of Being a Rational Agent’, in T. A. F. Kuipers and A. R. Mackor (eds), Cognitive Patterns in Science and Common Sense, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 349–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenburg, J.: 1996, Acting Against One's Best Judgement: An Enquiry into Practical Reasoning, Dispositions and Weakness of Will, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenburg, J.: 1998, ‘The Dual Character of Causality: How Davidson's Theory of Action Explanation Deals with Akrasia’, Dialektik 35(2), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, T. M.: 1990, ‘Plato and Davidson: Parts of the Soul and Weakness of Will’, in D. Copp (ed.), Canadian Philosophers. Celebrating Twenty Years of the Canadian Journal of Philosophy, The University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, pp. 35–74. (Supplementary Volume 16 of the Canadian Journal of Philosophy.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: Protagoras, translated by W. K. C. Guthrie, in E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters, Princeton University Press, Princeton. 1961, Thirteenth printing 1987, pp. 308–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: The Republic, translated with an introduction by D. Lee, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex. 1955, second revised edn 1974; reprint 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L.: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, A. W.: 1995, Mental Conflict, Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1974, The Roots of Reference, Open Court, La Salle, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1938, Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, reprint 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1951, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C.: 1976, Foreword to H. Reichenbach, Laws, Modalities, and Counterfactuals, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. vi-xliii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M.: 1986, ‘Rational Dilemmas and Rational Supererogation’, Philosophical Topics 14, 59–76. Reprinted in P. K. Moser (ed.), Rationality in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 465–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E.: 1993, ‘Davidson's Thinking Causes’, in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds), pp. 41–50.

  • Stoecker, R.: 1994, ‘Willenschwäche-Wie ist das nur möglich?’, in G. Preyer et al. (eds), Language, Mind and Epistemology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 313–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G.: 1977, ‘Skepticism about Weakness of Will’, Philosophical Review 86, 316–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. von: 1971, Explanation and Understanding, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peijnenburg, J. Akrasia, Dispositions And Degrees. Erkenntnis 53, 285–308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026563930319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026563930319

Keywords

Navigation