Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medicine as a science of action a response to Peter Hucklenbroich

  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hucklenbroich, P.: 1981, ‘Action theory as a source for philosophy of medicine’,Metamedicine 2, 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C.: 1981, ‘Response to our commentators’,Metamedicine 2, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sadegh-zadeh, K.: 1981, ‘Normative systems and medical metaethics. Part 1: Value kinematics, health, and disease’,Metamedicine 2, 75–119.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomasma, D. C., and Pellegrino, E. D.: 1981, ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’,Metamedicine 2, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Catholic University of America, 20064, Washington, D. C., USA

    Edmund D. Pellegrino

  2. Program on Human Values and Ethics, Univ. of TN Center f. the Health Sciences, 800 Madison Avenue, 38163, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

    David C. Thomasma

Authors
  1. Edmund D. Pellegrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David C. Thomasma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellegrino, E.D., Thomasma, D.C. Medicine as a science of action a response to Peter Hucklenbroich. Metamedicine 2, 235–243 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00884425

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00884425

Search

Navigation