Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T11:27:31.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hume, Locke and consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Terence Penelhum
Terence Penelhum*
Affiliation:
Department of Religious Studies, University of Calgary, 5604 Baroc Rd NW, Calgary, ABT3A 4R2, Canada
*
*Email: penelhum@ucalgary.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a reply to Donald Ainslie's discussion of Terence Penelhum's work on Hume, Locke and the nature of consciousness; although agree on many points about the differences between Locke and Hume, I take issue with Ainslie's views about the epistemic status Hume accords to introspective acts.

Keywords

HumeLockePenelhumideaperceptionscepticism
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 42 , Issue S1: Hume in Alberta: Selected Papers from the 2012 Hume Conference in Calgary , February 2012 , pp. 198 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, Donald 2003. “Hume, a Scottish Socrates?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (1): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette 1991. A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fogelin, Robert 2009. Hume's Skeptical Crisis: A Textual Study. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 1975. Hume. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 1992. David Hume: An Introduction to His Philosophical System. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 2000. Themes in Hume: The Self, The Will and Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar