Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:19:33.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plato and Davidson: Parts of the Soul and Weakness of Will

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Terrence M. Penner*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706, U.S.A.
Get access

Extract

One natural way of explaining the phenomenon of akrasia, or weakness of will, would be this: to describe a conflict between a desire that is more or less rational (that represents, or corresponds to, a considered judgment on what is to be done), and a desire that is rather less rational, where the less rational desire wins out ‘against one’s better judgment.’ To explain what makes two such desires conflicting desires (as opposed to being just two different desires), it is then natural to suggest that they originate in distinct ‘parts of the soul’ (or in distinct ‘partitions of the mind’).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnyeat, Myles F.Aristotle on Learning to be Good,’ in Rorty (1980).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. ‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible,’ in Feinberg, Joel ed., Moral Concepts (London: Oxford University Press 1969),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. ‘Paradoxes of Irrationality,’ in Wollheim, R.A. and Hopkins, J., eds., Philosophical Essays on Freud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. ‘Deception and Division,’ in Elster, Jon, ed., The Multiple Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986)Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald. ‘The Good and the True,Mind 83 (1974)Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I.Explaining Behavior (Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press 1988)Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. Freedom of the Individual (New York: Harper and Row 1965)Google Scholar
Kenny, A.J.Mental Health in Plato’s Republic,’ Proceedings of the British Academy (1971)Google Scholar
Murphy, N.R.Interpretation of Plato’s Republic (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1951)Google Scholar
Penner, T.Thought and Desire in Plato,’ in Vlastos, G., ed., Plato (New York: Anchor 1971)Google Scholar
Penner, T.Socrates on the Strength of Knowledge’ (unpublished)Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, ed. Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1980)Google Scholar
Santas, Gerasimos. ‘Plato’s Protagoras and Explanations of Weakness,Philosophical Review 75 (1966); reprinted in Vlastos (1971), and in Santas (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santas, Gerasimos. Socrates (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1979)Google Scholar
Vlastos, G., ed. Introduction to the Protagoras (New York: Bobbs-Merrill 1956)Google Scholar
Vlastos, G., ed. Socrates (New York: Anchor 1971)Google Scholar
Vlastos, G., ‘The Paradox of Socrates,’ in Vlastos (1971)Google Scholar
Walsh, James J.Aristotle’s Conception of Moral Weakness (New York: Columbia University Press 1963); ch. 1 has been reprinted in Vlastos (1971)Google Scholar
Watson, Gary. ‘Skepticism about Weakness of Will,Philosophical Review 88 (1977), 316-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. ‘Free Agency,’ Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 205-20; reprinted in Watson (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary., ed. Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. ‘Weakness of Will, Commensurability, and the Objects of Deliberation and Desire,Proceedings of the Aristotlelian Society 79 (1978-79) 251-77, reprinted in Rorty (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. ‘Ethical Consistency’ (1966), in Problems of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. ‘Conflicts of Values’ (1979) in Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980)Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Collins 1985)Google Scholar