Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:15:07.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion after atheism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

TERENCE PENELHUM
TERENCE PENELHUM*
Affiliation:
Department of Religious Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaT2N 1N4 e-mail: penelhum@ucalgary.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reflects critically on some of the claims of J. L. Schellenberg's trilogy and on the fundamental decisions lying behind them. Some of the latter are found to be tied to his earlier work on atheism in ways that can be questioned.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 49 , Special Issue 2: Critical Essays on J. L. Schellenberg's Philosophy of Religion , June 2013 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Macintosh, J. J. (2011) ‘Sceptical ultimism, or not so sceptical atheism?’, Philo, 14, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence (1971) Religion and Rationality (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (1993) Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005) Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2007) The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2009) The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian (1992) Doctrine and Argument in Indian Philosophy (Boston: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar