An Answer to the Problem of Other Minds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v3i1.249Keywords:
Existential Phenomenology, Transcendental Argument, Problem of Other Minds, Science and Consciousness, EthicsAbstract
The present paper sets out to counter the claim put forward by British philosopher of mind, Robert Kirk, according to which Sartre’s notion of consciousness as for-itself, while offering some valuable insights regarding human existence, nonetheless fails to engage with the problem of how to establish the existence of such conscious beings on philosophical grounds. To the extent that it succeeds in meeting the challenge raised by Kirk’s comment, the reading of Being and Nothingness offered here could be considered as fulfilling a twofold aim. Firstly, it offers an answer to the problem of other minds which is construed on the basis of Sartre’s ontological work, thus contributing to a still open debate in the scholarly literature devoted to Sartre’s thought. Secondly, it illustrates one way in which a specific problem which is amply discussed among contemporary philosophers of mind could be tackled from within a conceptual framework rooted in the continental tradition of philosophy.Downloads
Published
2008-01-17
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright for an article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to PhaenEx. By virtue of its appearance in this Open Access Journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes. Reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author. The author agrees to use proper citation of PhaenEx as the original source whenever s/he later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms. ISSN: 1911-1576
Articles in PhaenEx are available under a Creative Commons Attribution License.