Skip to main content

Ethics for an Uninhabited Planet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Human Factor in a Mission to Mars

Part of the book series: Space and Society ((SPSO))

Abstract

Some authors argue that we have a moral obligation to leave Mars the way it is, even if it does not harbour any life. This claim is usually based on an assumption that Mars has intrinsic value. The problem with this concept is that different authors use it differently. In this chapter, I investigate different ways in which an uninhabited Mars is said to have intrinsic value. First, I investigate whether the planet can have moral standing. I find that this is not a plausible assumption. I then investigate different combinations of objective value and end value. I find that there is no way we can know whether an uninhabited Mars has objective end value and even if it does, this does not seem to imply any moral obligations on us. I then investigate whether an uninhabited Mars can have subjective end value. I conclude that this is very plausible. I also investigate whether an uninhabited Mars can have objective instrumental value in relation to some other, non-Mars related end value. I find also this very plausible. It is also highly plausible, however, that spreading (human or other) life to a presently uninhabited Mars can also have subjective end value, as well as objective instrumental value. I mention shortly two ways of prioritising between these values: (1) The utilitarian method of counting the number of sentient beings who entertain each value and determining the strength of the values to them. (2) Finding a compromise that allows colonisation on parts of the planet while leaving other parts untouched. These methods should be seen as examples, not as an exhaustive list. Also, I do not take a definitive stand in favour of any of the two approaches, though it seems at least prima facie that the second approach may have a better chance of actually leading to a constructive result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bachman, J. (2018). Setting a date for landing humans on Mars Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-08/can-humans-get-to-mars-in-12-years. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Beall, A. (2018). If Elon Musk is to colonise Mars, he’ll need to recruit a crew of genetically-modified humans Wired 03/02/2018. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/elon-musk-mars-colony-spacex-radiation-genetically-modified-humans. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Bernstein, M. (1998). Well-being. American Philosophical Quarterly, 35, 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, L. (2006). How shall we live in space? Culture, Law and Ethics in Spacefaring Society Space Policy, 22, 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueck, H. (2018). NASA wants to send humans to Mars in the 2030s—here’s the step-by-step timeline Business Insider 01/03/2018. https://www.businessinsider.com/when-will-we-colonize-mars-nasa-timeline-2030s-2018-2?r=US&IR=T&IR=T. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Callicott, J. B. (1992). Moral consider ability and extraterrestrial life. In E. C. Hargrove (Ed.), The animal rights/environmental ethics debate (pp. 137–150). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chon-Torres, O. A. (2018). Disciplinary nature of astrobiology and astrobioethic’s epistemic foundations. International Journal of Astrobiology, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. L. (1977). The moral status of animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. S. (2005). The value of microorganisms. Environmental Ethics, 27, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. S. (2011a). Ethics and extraterrestrial life. In N. -L. Remuss, K. -U. Schrogl, J.-C. Worms, & U. Landfester (Eds.) Humans in outer space—interdisciplinary perspectives, studies in space policy (vol. 5, pp 80–101).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. S. (2011b). Microbial rights? EMBO Reports, 12, 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. S. (2016). The ethical status of microbial life on earth and elsewhere: In defence of intrinsic value. In J. S. J. Schwartz, & T. Milligan (Eds.), The ethics of space exploration (pp. 167–179). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C., Horneck, G. (2004). A planetary park system for Mars. Space Policy 20, 291–295.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. S., Honeck, G. (2006). Planetary parks—formulating a wilderness policy for planetary bodies. Space Policy 22, 256–261.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, N. (2017). Beijing eyes ‘robotic and human settlement’ on Mars with ambitious 2020 mission. The Telegraph. Published 21/09/2017. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/21/plans-2020-chinese-mars-probe-explore-possibility-human-settlement/. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.

  • de Grazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, A. (2018). Can we colonize Mars? Nova next. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/space/want-to-live-in-a-treehouse-on-mars/. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Green, B. P. (2014). Ethical approaches to astrobiology and space exploration: Comparing kant. Mill, and Aristotle Ethics: Contemporary Issues, 2(1), 29–44.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (2017). SpaceX will colonise Mars in the next few years, says boss Elon Musk. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/spacex-elon-musk-mars-colony-moon-space-rocket-falcon-nasa-australia-a7973546.html. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Helm, B. W. (2002). Felt evaluations: A theory of pleasure and pain. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. (1998). Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. Environmental Values, 7, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. (1997). Recent work on consciousness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34, 379–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupisella, M. (1997). The rights of Martians space policy 13(2), 89–94.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lupisella, M. (2000). Humans and Martians earth space review 9(1), 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupisella, M. (2009). The search for extraterrestrial life: Epistemology, ethics, and worldviews. In C. M. Bertka (Ed.), Exploring the origin, extent, and future of life: Philosophical, ethical, and theological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, E. (2017). Elon musk has an update on his Mars colony plans. CNET. Published 20/09/2017. https://www.cnet.com/news/elon-musk-spacex-mars-colony-nasa-iac-2017-adelaide/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.

  • Marshall, A. (1993). Ethics and the extraterrestrial environment. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 10(2), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (1992). The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist, 75, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, R. (1997). Intrinsic value, moral standing, and species. Environmental Ethics, 19, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, E. (2008). What is wrong with extinction?. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, E. (2012). The moral standing of extraterrestrial life astrobiology 12, 976–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, E. (2013). Philosophical aspects of astrobiology. In D. Dunér, J. Pathermore, E. Persson, & G. Holmberg (Eds.), The history and philosophy of astrobiology (pp. 29–48). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, E. (2014). What does it take to establish that a world is uninhabited prior to exploitation?–A question of ethics as well as science. Challenges 5, 224–238.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, E. (2017). Ethics and the potential conflicts between astrobiology, planetary protection and commercial use of space. Challenges 8(1), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. (2018). Does extraterrestrial life have intrinsic value? An exploration in responsibility ethics. International Journal of Astrobiology, 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, W., & Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. (1999). A distinction in value: Intrinsic and for its own sake. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, M. S., & Randolph, R. O. (2002). The need for operating guidelines and a decision making framework applicable to the discovery of non-intelligent extraterrestrial life. Advances in Space Research, 30(6), 1583–1591.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, R. O., & McKay, C. P. (2014). Protecting and expanding the richness and diversity of life, an ethic for astrobiology research and space exploration. International Journal of Astrobiology 13(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2001). Defending animal rights. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. I. (1986). The preservation of natural value in the solar system. In E. C. Hargrove (Ed.), Beyond spaceship earth (pp. 140–182). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2009). Animal liberation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. C. (2009). The trouble with intrinsic value: An ethical primer for astrobiology. In C. M. Bertka (Ed.), Exploring the origin, extent, and future of life: Philosophical, ethical, and theological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. C. (2016). The curious case of the martian microbes: Mariomania, intrinsic value and the prime directie. In J. S. J. Schwartz, & T. Milligan (Eds.), The ethics of space exploration (pp. 195–208). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solon, O. (2018). Elon musk: We must colonise Mars to preserve our species in a third world war. The Guardian 11/03/2018. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/11/elon-musk-colonise-mars-third-world-war. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Thompson (2018) Is colonizing Mars the most important project in human history? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/06/could-colonizing-mars-be-the-most-important-project-in-human-history/564041/. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by The National Aeronautics and Space Administration through grant NNX14AR81G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Persson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Persson, E. (2019). Ethics for an Uninhabited Planet. In: Szocik, K. (eds) The Human Factor in a Mission to Mars. Space and Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02059-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics