Abstract
The most serious threat currently facing people all over the world is that of a global nuclear war, in which hundreds of millions of people would be killed by the immediate effects of nuclear explosions, and over a billion others would later die of cold and starvation in the ensuing nuclear winter. Physicians and other health professionals have an ethical responsibility to educate themselves, their patients, and the public to the need for major political changes to achieve multilateral disarmament and thus prevent nuclear war. Scientists ought to oppose all research and government expenditures preparing for war, and should participate only in work designed to improve health and living standards for all the world's inhabitants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leaf, A.: 1986 ‘New perspectives on the medical consequences of nuclear war’, New England Journal of Medicine 315, pp. 905–12.
Bondietti, E. A.: 1982, ‘Nuclear war: The aftermath. Effects on agriculture’, Ambio 11, pp. 138–42.
Abrams, H. L.: 1981, Speech delivered at the Symposium on the Medical Consequences of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear War, University of Washington, April 18, 1981.
Barnaby, F. and J. Rotblat: 1982, ‘Nuclear war: The aftermath. The effects of nuclear war’, Ambio 11, pp. 84–93.
Romm, J. J. and M. A. Sastry: 1983, ‘The impact of nuclear warfare on Canada’, Physics in Canada 39, pp. 64–67.
Turco, R. P., O. B. Toon, T. P. Ackerman, J. B. Pollack and C. Sagan: 1983, ‘Nuclear winter: Global consequences of multiple nuclear explosions’, Science 222, pp. 1283–92.
Beardsley, T.: 1985, ‘Nuclear winter: International committee echoes gloomy forecasts’, Nature 371, pp. 191–2.
Perry, T. L.: 1986, ‘Nuclear winter: Latest threat to human survival’, British Columbia Medical Journal 28, pp. 621–24.
Perry, T. L.: 1986, ‘What the arms race is doing to people in the Third World’, in T. L. Perry and J. G. Foulks (ed.), End the Arms Race: Fund Human Needs, West Vancouver: Gordon Soules Book Pub., pp. 167–77.
Leggett, J.: 1988, ‘Could cruise missiles stop START?’, Nature 334, pp. 307–08.
Marshall, E.: 1987, ‘Nuclear test watchers feel political heat’, Science 237, pp. 594–96.
Palca, J.: 1986, ‘SDI: Academics pledge opposition’, Nature 324, p. 369.
Norman, C.: 1988, ‘Mathematicians say no to SDI funding’, Science 240, p. 140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. Perry is Professor of Pharmacology & Therapeutics at the University of British Columbia. Educated at Oxford and at Harvard Medical School, he first practiced pediatrics, and later became a neurochemist researching a variety of human brain disorders. He has been a peace activist since seeing combat in Europe during World War II. He works in Canadian Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, and in Veterans Against Nuclear Arms, and is an appointed member of Vancouver City Council's Special Committee on Peace.
The articles by Thomas L. Perry, Gilles D. Hurteau, and Joanna Santa Barbara are the result of a three-person panel presentation and therefore appear under the same title. At the publisher's discretion, roman numerals have been included to distinguish these articles.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, T.L. Global peace as a professional concern, I. J Bus Ethics 8, 167–171 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382579
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382579