Photographocene: The past, present and future in the photography of the environment | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

Photography has an important place in picturing and documenting environmental changes, especially when they occur in distant areas, or are inaccessible from ground level and/or imperceptible to the naked eye due to their scale. As the invention of photographic technology was officially registered only 55 years after the invention of the steam engine (which is commonly taken as the starting point of the Anthropocene era), most subsequent transformations of the environment have been well documented. One needs to distinguish the time of human changes to the environment, the Anthropocene, from images of the era this term names, which are the way humans learn of their own environmental deeds. Such images may be dependent, yet they are also distinct insofar as they influence the perception as well as the production of the Anthropocene itself, framed by limits of the static, fractioned, subjectivized and perspectival medium of photography. In this vein, the article risks proposing yet another in a long series of neologisms that aim to define the unstable or extreme times we live in: the Photographocene. The Photographocene marks various phases of the human relationship to the environment in which photographs have documented, directly communicated and announced impending environmental processes directly caused by human actions. Yet, this is also an era marked by photographic images of the environment that report but also pollute our relationship to the environment by forming an alternate reality. Thus, this concept enables one to articulate the role that images have in our understanding of the past–present–future human impact on the environment.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00030_1
2020-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aloi, G.. ( 2018), Speculative Taxidermy: Natural History, Animal Surfaces, and Art in the Anthropocene, New York, NY:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.. ( 1975;), ‘ The photographic message. ’, in S. Sontag. (ed.), Barthes’ Reader, New York:: Hill and Wang;, pp. 194–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bear, J., and Albers, K. P.. ( 2017), Before-and-After Photography: Histories and Contexts, London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Braddock, A. C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Ecocritical art history. ’, American Art, 23:2, pp. 24–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braddock, A. C., and Ater, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ Art in the Anthropocene. ’, review, American Art, 28:3, pp. 2–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bratton, B. H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Some trace effects of the post-Anthropocene: On accelerationist geopolitical aesthetics. ’, E-Flux Journal, 46June, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/46/60076/some-trace-effects-of-the-post-anthropocene-on-accelerationist-geopolitical-aesthetics/. Accessed 1 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinley Buckley, E. M.,, Allen, C. R.,, Forsberg, M.,, Farrell M., and Caven, A. J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Capturing change the duality of time-lapse imagery to acquire data and depict ecological dynamics. ’, Ecology and Society, 22:3, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09268-220330. Accessed 5 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheetham, M.. ( 2018), Landscape into Eco Art, Pennsylvania, PA:: Penn State University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, T.. ( 2015), Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept, New York, NY:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Clover, J., and Spahl, J.. ( 2014), #Misanthropocene: 24 Theses, Oakland, CA:: Commune Editions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Collier, P.,, Inkpen, R., and Fontana, D.. ( 2001;), ‘ The use of historical photography in environmental studies. ’, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography Environment, 184, n.pag, 10.4000/cybergeo.4019. Accessed 1 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Corbett, J. B., and Clark, B.. ( 2017), The Arts and Humanities in Climate Change Engagement, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. , Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Coughlin, M., and Gephart, E.. ( 2019), Ecocriticism and the Anthropocene in Nineteenth Century Art and Visual Culture, Routledge Advances in Art and Visual Studies. , London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Crutzen, P. J.. ( 2002;), ‘ Geology of mankind. ’, Nature, 415:23, n.pag, 10.1038/415023a. Accessed 1 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis, H., and Turpin, E.. ( 2015), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies, London:: Open Humanities Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Demos, T. J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Contemporary art and the politics of ecology. ’, Third Text, 27:1, pp. 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Demos, T. J.. ( 2017), Against the Anthropocene: Visual Culture and Environment Today, Berlin:: Sternberg Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Demos, T. J.,, Bach, M., and Rech, M.. ( 2016), Decolonizing Nature: Contemporary Art and the Politics of Ecology, Berlin:: Sternberg Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Doyle, J.. ( 2011), Mediating Climate Change, Farnham:: Ashgate;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Emmelhainz, I.. ( 2015;), ‘ Images do not show: The desire to see in the Anthropocene. ’, in H. Davis, and E. Turpin. (eds), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. , London:: Open Humanities Press;, pp. 131–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Estes, H.. ( 2017), Anglo-Saxon Literary Landscapes: Ecotheory and the Environmental Imagination, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Estok, S. C., and Chou, S. S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Foreword: The city and the Anthropocene. ’, Concentric, 43:1, pp. 3–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fisher, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Photographic scale. ’, Philosophy of Photography, 3:2, pp. 311–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Giannachi, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Representing, performing and mitigating climate change in contemporary art practice. ’, Leonardo, 45:2, pp. 124–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hamilton, C.. ( 2010), Requiem for Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change, Crows Nest, NSW:: Allen and Unwin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Haraway, D. J.. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hedin, G., and Gremaud, A.-S. N.. ( 2018), Artistic Visions of the Anthropocene North: Climate Change and Nature in Art, New York, NY:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, U.. ( 2014;), ‘ How photography matters: On producing meaning in photobooks on climate change. ’, in B. Schneider, and T. Nocke. (eds), Image Politics of Climate Change, Bielfeld:: Transcript Verlag;, pp. 273–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaplan, A. E.. ( 2016), Climate Trauma: Foreseeing the Future in Dystopian Film and Fiction, New Brunswick, NJ, and London:: Rutgers University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kastner, J., and Wallis, B.. ( 2010), Land and Environmental Art, London:: Phaidon;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kember, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ After the Anthropocene: The photographic for earthly survival?’. , Digital Creativity, 28:4, pp. 348–53, 10.1080/14626268.2017.1380048. Accessed 5 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mirzoeff, N.. ( 2014;), ‘ Visualizing the Anthropocene. ’, Public Culture, 26:2, pp. 213–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Moore, J. W.. (ed.) ( 2016), Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, Oakland, CA:: Kairos;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Morton, T.. ( 2009), Ecology Without Nature Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics, Cambridge, MA and London:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Neill, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. ’, Geoforum, 49, pp. 10–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Parikka, J.. ( 2015a), The Anthrobscene, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Parikka, J.. ( 2015b), A Geology of Media, Electronic Mediations. , vol. 46, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Parikka, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ The sensed smog: Smart ubiquitous cities and the sensorial body. ’, The Fibreculture Journal, 219, n.pag, https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.29.219.2017. Accessed 10 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Parikka, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Architectures of air: Media ecologies of smart cities and pollution’. , in M. Voyatzaki. (ed.), Architectural Materialisms: Nonhuman Creativity, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press;, pp. 207–27, https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474420570.003.0010. Accessed 5 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Reiss, J. H.. (ed.) ( 2019), Art, Theory and Practice in the Anthropocene, Delaware:: Vernon Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rubinstein, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ Posthuman photography. ’, in M. Bohr, and B. Sliwinska. (eds), The Evolution of the Image, London:: Routledge;, pp. 100–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schneider, B.,, Nocke, T.. and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( 2014), Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations, Bielefeld:: Transcript Verlag;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sheppard, S. R. J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. ’, Environmental Science and Policy, 8:6, pp. 637–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sontag, S.. ( 1965;), ‘ Imagination of disaster. ’, Commentary Magazine, October, https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/susan-sontag/the-imagination-of-disaster/. Accessed 1 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Stiegler, B.. ( 2018), The Neganthropocene, London:: Open Humanities Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Weintraub, L.. ( 1997), Art on the Edge and Over: Searching for Arts Meaning in Contemporary Society, 1970s–1990s, London:: Art Data;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Young, L.. ( 2019), Machine Landscapes: Architectures of the Post-Anthropocene, Hoboken:: Wiley;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Zylinska, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Photography after the human. ’, Photographies, 9:2, pp. 167–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Zylinska, J.. ( 2017), Nonhuman Photography, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Zylinska, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Photography after extinction. ’, in R. Grusin. (ed.), After Extinction, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;, pp. 51–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Peraica, Ana. ( 2020;), ‘ Photographocene: The past, present and future in the photography of the environment. ’, Philosophy of Photography, 11:1&2, pp. 99–111, https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00030_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00030_1
Loading
Photographocene: The past, present and future in the photography of the environment
Philosophy of Photography 11, 99 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00030_1
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00030_1
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00030_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Anthropocene; archive; environmental photography; Photographocene; photography; pollution

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error