Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructivism, Cognition, and Science – An Investigation of Its Links and Possible Shortcomings

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the questions concerningthe relationship between scientific andcognitive processes. The fact that both,science and cognition, aim at acquiring somekind of knowledge or representationabout the “world” is the key for establishing alink between these two domains. It turns outthat the constructivist frameworkrepresents an adequate epistemologicalfoundation for this undertaking, as its focusof interest is on the (constructive)relationship between the world and itsrepresentation. More specifically, it will beshown how cognitive processes and their primaryconcern to construct a representation of theenvironment and to generate functionallyfitting behavior can act as the basis forembedding the activities and dynamics of theprocess of science in them by making use ofconstructivist concepts, such as functionalfitness, structure determinedness, etc.Cognitive science and artificiallife provide the conceptual framework of representational spaces and their interactionbetween each other and with the environmentenabling us to establish this link betweencognitive processes and thedevelopment/dynamics of scientific theories.The concepts of activation, synaptic weight,and genetic (representational) spaces arepowerful tools which can be used as“explanatory vehicles”for a cognitivefoundation of science, more specifically forthe “context of discovery” (i.e., thedevelopment, construction, and dynamics ofscientific theories and paradigms).Representational spaces do not only offer us abetter understanding of embedding science incognition, but also show, how theconstructivist framework, both, can act as anadequate epistemological foundation for theseprocesses and can be instantiated by theserepresentational concepts from cognitivescience. The final part of this paper addresses somemore fundamental questions concerning thepositivistic and constructivist understandingof science and human cognition. Among otherthings it is asked, whether a purelyfunctionalist and quantitative view of theworld aiming almost exclusively at itsprediction and control is really satisfying forour intellect (having the goal of achieving aprofound understanding of reality).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arbib, M.A. (ed.): 1995, The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R.W.: 1964, An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Methuen. Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of Science. An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belew, R.K.: 1990, Evolution, Learning, and Culture: Computational Metaphors for Adaptive Algorithms. Complex Systems 4: 11–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belew, R.K., J. McInerney and N.N. Schraudolph: 1992, Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning. In C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds.), Artificial Life II, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 511–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and M. Singer: 1992, Dealing with Genes: The Language of Heredity. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakel, J.V.: 1994, Cognitive Scientism of Science. Psycoloquy (electronic journal) 5(20) (filename: scientific-cognition.3.vanbrakel).

  • Brown, T.H., A.H. Ganong, E.W. Kariss and C.L. Keenan: 1990, Hebbian Synapses: Biophysical Mechanisms And Algorithms. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13: 475–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, A., D. Parisi and S. Nolfi: 1994, Cell Division and Migration in A Genotype for Neural Networks. Network: computation in Neural Systems 5(4): 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M.: 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (ed.): 1989, A Neurocomputational Perspective – The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M.: 1991, A Deeper Unity: Some Feyerabendian Themes in Neurocomputational Form. In G. Munevar (ed.), Beyond Reason: Essays on the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–23 (reprinted in R.N. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies In The Philosophy of Science XV, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M.: 1995, The Engine of Reason, The Seat of the Soul. A Philosophical Journey into the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. and P.S. Churchland: 1990, Could a Machine Think? Scientific American 262(1): 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. and T.J. Sejnowski: 1992, The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G.M.: 1988, Topobiology: An Introduction to Molecular Embryology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essen, D.C.v., C.H. Anderson and D.J. Felleman: 1992, Information Processing in the Primate Visual System: An Integrated Systems Perspective. Science 255: 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: 1975, The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: 1981, Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, H.v.: 1973, On Constructing a Reality. In W.F.E. Preiser (ed.), Environmental Design Research, Volume 2. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson & Ross. (reprinted in P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Invented Reality, Norton, 41–61, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M.S. (ed.): 1995, The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N. (ed.): 1992, Cognitive Models of Science, Volume XV of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy Of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Giere, R.N.: 1994, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Theories. Philosophy of Science 61: 276–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E.v.: 1984, An Introduction to Radical Constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Invented Reality. New York: Norton, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E.v.: 1991, Knowing without Metaphysics. Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position. In F. Steier (ed.), Research and Reflexivity. London; Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publishers, 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E.v.: 1995, Radical Constructivism: A Way Of Knowing And Learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O.: 1949, The Organization of Behavior; A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiden, U.a.d.: 1992, Selbstorganisation in dynamischen Systemen. In W. Krohn and G. Küppers (eds.), Emergenz: die Entstehung von Ordnung, Organisation und Bedeutung. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, J., A. Krogh and R.G. Palmer: 1991, Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation, Volume 1 of Santa Fe Institute Studies In The Sciences Of Complexity. Lecture Notes. Redwood City, Ca: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G.E.: 1987, Connectionist Learning Procedures. Technical Report CMUCS-87-115, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H.: 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1996, Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H.: 1988, Eye, Brain, And Vision. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H. and T.N. Wiesel: 1968, Receptive Fields and Functional Architecture of Monkey Striate Cortex. Journal of Physiology 195: 215–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessel, T.M.: 1991, Neuronal Survival and Synapse Formation. In E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz and T.M. Jessel (eds.), Principles Of Neural Science (3rd ed.). New York: Elsevier, 929–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.R., J.H. Schwartz and T.M. Jessel (eds.): 1991, Principles of Neural Science (3rd ed.). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosso, P.: 1992, Reading the Book of Nature. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C.G. (ed.): 1989, Artificial Life. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C.G. (ed.): 1994, Artificial Life III. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C.G. (ed.): 1995, Artificial Life. An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R.: 1991, Science and Daily Life: The Ontology of Scientific Explanations. In F. Steier (ed.), Research and reflexivity. London, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publishers, 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. (ed.): 1998, Biologie der Realität. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (eds.): 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Volume 42 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.

  • Miller, G., P. Todd and S. Hedge: 1989, Designing Neural Networks Using Genetic Algorithms. In J.D. Schaffer (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo, CA: M. Kaufmann Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. and S. Forrest: 1994, Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Life. Artficial Life 1(3): 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A.: 1980, Physical Symbol Systems. Cognitive Science 4: 135–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H.A. Simon: 1976, Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the Assoc. for Computing Machinery (ACM) 19(3): 113–126 (reprinted in M. Boden (ed.), The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Oxford University Press, 1990; in German in D. Münch (ed.), Kognitionswissenschaft, Suhrkamp, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M.F.: 1994a, Embodiment of Knowledge in the Sensory System and its Contribution to Sensorimotor Integration. The Role of Sensors in Representational and Epistemological Issues. In P. Gaussier And J.D. Nicoud (eds.), From Perception to Action Conference. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Society Press, 444–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M.F.: 1994b, Repräsentation und Konstruktion. Kognitions-und neuroinformtische Konzepte als Grundlage einer naturalisierten Epistemologie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M.F.: 1997, The Representational Relation Between Environmental Structures and Neural Systems: Autonomy and Environmental Dependency in Neural Knowledge Representation. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 1(2): 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, R. and T.v. Gelder (eds.): 1995, Mind as Motion: Explorations in theDynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G.: 1992, Kognition: die Entstehung von Bedeutung im Gehirn. In W. Krohn and G. Küppers (eds.), Emergenz: die Entstehung von Ordnung, Organisation und Bedeutung. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 104–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G.: 1994, Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit. Kognitive Neurobiologie und ihre Philosophischen Konsequenzen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. and J.L. McClelland (eds.): 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Foundations, Volume I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Schmidt, S.J.: 1998, Die Zähmung des Blicks. Konstruktivismus – Empirie – Wissenschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E.L. (ed.): 1990, Computational Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T.J., C. Koch and P.S. Churchland: 1988, Computational Neuroscience. Science 241(4871): 1299–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L.: 1995, The Artificial Life Roots of Artificial Intelligence. In C.G. Langton (ed.), Artificial Life. An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 75–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F. (ed.): 1991, Research and Reflexivity. London; Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1988, Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.J., E. Thompson and E. Rosch (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.: 1948, Cybernetic. Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P.H.: 1992, Artificial Intelligence (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Philosophy of Science & Social Studies of Science, University of Vienna, Sensengasse 8/10, A–1090, Wien, Austria/Europe

    Markus F. Peschl

Authors
  1. Markus F. Peschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peschl, M.F. Constructivism, Cognition, and Science – An Investigation of Its Links and Possible Shortcomings. Foundations of Science 6, 125–161 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011390200250

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011390200250

Search

Navigation