Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:03:58.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

End-of-Life Care: Forensic Medicine v. Palliative Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Joseph P. Pestaner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The increasing life expectancy of terminally-ill people has raised many public policy concerns about end-of-life care. Due to increased longevity and the lack of cures for illnesses like cancer and heart disease, palliative care, particularly pain management, has become an important mode OF medical therapy. Palliative care providers feel that “[h]ealth care professionals have a moral duty to provide adequate palliative care and pain relief, even if such care shortens the patient’s life.” Practitioners of forensic medicine grapple with determining when to classify the death of a person formerly receiving palliative care as a non-natural death. Such classification may be paramount in the enforcement of new statutes that aim at preventing assisted suicide or monitoring the quality of health care, but it potentially places forensic medicine and palliative medicine in adversarial roles.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Fall 2003 , pp. 365 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See generally Gorsuch, N.M., “The Right to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 23 (2000): 599–710; see also Finucane, T., “Thinking About Life-Sustaining Treatment Late in the Life of a Demented Person,” Georgia Law Review, 35 (2001): 691–705.Google Scholar
See generally Baldwin, D.C. Jr., “The Role of the Physician in End-of-Life Care: What More Can We Do?,” Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2 (1999): 258–267; see also Porter, R., “Failure to Treat Pain is Elder Abuse,” Trial, 37 (September 2001): 87.Google Scholar
See Smith, D.H. Veatch, R.M., eds., Guidelines on the Termination of Life Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987): At 129.Google Scholar
See Levine, B. et al., “Palliative Pain Therapy at the End of Life & Forensic Medicine Issues,” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 22 (2001): 62–64; see also Spitz, W.U., ed., Spitz and Fisher's Medicolegal Investigation of Death (Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1333): At 175 (stating that a natural death is caused exclusively by disease).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Gorsuch, N.M., “The Right to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy”, 23 (2000): 599–710.Google Scholar
See Barnett, J. Detzel, T., “Ashcroft Acts to Undo Oregon's Suicide Law: The Order: The Policy Bars Lethal Doses of Federally Controlled Drugs,” Portland Oregonian, November 7, 2001, at A-1.Google Scholar
See Barnett, J. Detzel, T., supra note 6.Google Scholar
See Orentlicher, D. Caplan, A., “The Pain Relief Act of 1999,” JAMA, 283 (2000) 255–258 (reviewing the potential problems that the Act may raise for palliative care).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Barnett, J., “Bush Policy on Suicide is Cloaked in Secrecy,” Portland Oregonian, November 11, 2001, at D-1.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Md. Code Ann., [Health–Gen.] § 5–309 (1999) (“Medical examiner's cases to be investigated include deaths by violence, by suicide, by casualty or if the deceased was in apparent good health or unattended by a physician and in any suspicious or unusual manner.”).Google Scholar
Snyder v. Holy Cross Hosp., 352 A.2d 334, 342 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1976) (holding that where cause of death could not be determined without an autopsy, the interest of the state in ascertaining the true cause of death outweighed the interest of a Jewish Orthodox family that did not want an autopsy on the body of their son who died suddenly at age eighteen).Google Scholar
See Sippio v. State 714 A.2d 864, 871(Md. 1998); see also Schlossman v. State, 659 A.2d 371, 381 n.5 (Md. App. 1995).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has a computerized system, AS 400, that allows for search and retrieval based on codes used by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.Google Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland (on file at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, accessible with the permission of the Chief Medical Examiner).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Spitz, , supra note 4, at 175.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Adams, J.H. Duchen, L.W., eds., Greenfield's Neuropathology (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992): At 1001, 1345 (supranuclear palsy is a prototype subcortical dementia demonstrating diffuse symmetric neuronal loss).Google Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24.Google Scholar
See notes supra 14–17.Google Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Adams, Duchen, , supra note 30; Cotran, R.S. et al., eds., Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1994): At 1333.Google Scholar
See Karch, S.B., The Pathology of Drug Abuse (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993): At 266 (describing ten cases where death was attributed to methadone with findings consistent with respiratory arrest).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24. After giving her mother the methadone, the daughter successfully had the morphine prescription filled, after which she came home to find her mother unresponsive.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.; Md. Regs. Code tit. 10.07.02 § 15A (2003) (“Pharmaceutical services shall be provided in accordance with accepted professional principles and appropriate federal, State and local laws.”)Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Personal communication from Laurie Bennett, Administrative Law Judge of the Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings, to author (November 17, 1999).Google Scholar
See Patricia Drummond v. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings, No. 93-DHMH -CME-96-039786.Google Scholar
See id at 15–16.Google Scholar
See id. at 10.Google Scholar
See id. “Her care providers prescribed Roxanol (i.e. liquid morphine), 5 ccs every six hours, on the reasonable assumption that she was in considerable pain.” Additionally, the medication was increased and “As the appellant's pain intensified, Dr. Fieldson [the treating physician] increased the Roxanol prescription from 5 ccs every six hours to every four hours.” Id. at 11. Dr. Fieldson increased the Roxanol to five cc every three hours just before her death. See id. at 11–12. See also Mostofsky, D.I. Lomranz, J., eds., Handbook of Pain and Aging (New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1997): At 89 (reporting few studies assessing pain in patients with dementia and stating, “As dementia progresses, direct assessment of the patient may become impossible”).Google Scholar
See Drummond, , supra note 44, at 20.Google Scholar
See id. at 23.Google Scholar
See Drummond, , supra note 44, at 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See id.; Ashburn, M.A. Rice, L.J., eds., The Management of Pain (New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1998): At 134 (contradicting the findings of the hearing and stating, “The development of tolerance is a slow process occurring over months to years. Studies in cancer patients have demonstrated that most patients reach a dose that remains constant for prolonged periods.”); Letter from John E. Smialek, Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland, to Mr. Leonard Collins (September 28, 1999) (on file with author) (reviewing the toxicologic findings of Natalie D. Eddington, Associate Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences and concludes that the level of morphine “is not consistent with the accounts given by family members.”); Levine, B. et al., “Palliative Pain Therapy at the End of Life & Forensic Medicine Issues,” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 22 (2001): 62–64 (reviewing the literature and finding that morphine levels as high as 1000 ng/ml have rarely been reported for cancer patients receiving palliative pain therapy). In Drummond, the free morphine concentration was several times higher than the highest free morphine reported in multiple studies.Google Scholar
See Drummond, supra note 44, at 29 ([Bly a preponderance of the evidence … the findings of the Chief Medical Examiner as to the cause and manner of death were incorrect.”) See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24 (the Secretary of the Department of Health or designee may adopt or reject the findings in such a matter but the Secretary never reviewed the case to decide for himself how the Department should view the findings).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Drummond, supra note 44, at 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24.Google Scholar
See id.; Levine, B. et al., “An Unusual Morphine Fatality,” Forensic Science International, 65 (1994): 7–11 (reporting that, “Next to ethanol, morphine from heroin use is the most frequently encountered drug of abuse on cases investigated by the office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland (OCME)”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland.Google Scholar
See id.; see also Garland, G., “Differing Views on Discipline for Doctors: Legislative Report Recommends Changes to Streamline System,” Baltimore Sun, December 5, 2001, at 4B.Google Scholar
See Hirsch, C.S. Flomenbaum, M., “Problem-Solving in Death Certification,” Check Sample, 8, no. 1 (1995): 1–31, at 8.Google Scholar
See id. at 18.Google Scholar
See id. at 8.Google Scholar
See id. at 21.Google Scholar
See id. at 29.Google Scholar
See Doyle, D. Hanks, G.W.C. Macdonald, N., eds., Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993): At 7.Google Scholar
See Smith, Veatch, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
See Thompson, B.A., “Final Exit: Should the Double Effect Rule Regarding the Legality of Euthanasia in the United Kingdom Be Laid to Rest,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 33 (2000): 1035–1077.Google Scholar
Sulmasy, D.P., “Commentary: Double Effect — Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 28, no. 1 (2000): 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See DiMaio, D. DiMaio, V.J.M., Forensic Pathology (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993): At 4.Google Scholar
See Spitz, , supra note 4, at 177; Cantor, N.L. Thomas, G.C., “The Legal Bounds of Physician Conduct Hastening Death,” Buffalo Law Review, 48 (2000): 83–173, at 111 (“When a terminal patient is given risky analgesics, causation is always an issue. It is very difficult to establish that analgesics hastened a dying process when critical natural pathologies were already afflicting the debilitated, terminally ill patient.”).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Hirsch, Flomenbaum, , supra note 60.Google Scholar
See Orentlicher, D. Caplan, A., “The Pain Relief Act of 1999,” JAMA, 283 (2000): 255–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
After the administrative hearing, staff members of the Forensic Medicine Center were required to attend an End of Life Seminar on Palliative Care and Pain Management on May 24, 1999.Google Scholar
See Orentlicher, Caplan, , supra note 74.Google Scholar
See Cantor, Thomas, , supra note 71.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Weiner, R.S. et al., eds., Pain Management: A Practical Guide for Clinicians (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998): At 705.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, H.J. Martyn, S.R., “Physician-Assisited Suicide: The Supreme Court's Wary Rejection,” University of Toledo Law Review, 31 (2000): 253–72.Google Scholar
Id. at 264–65 (further describing the impact of the process as severe even if the investigation results in only a warning).Google Scholar
“Emerging Issues in Health Care,” Health Law, 12, no. 2 (1999): 21–23, at 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Goodman, E., “A Doctor Taken to Task for Under-Treating his Patients' Pain,” Baltimore Sun, September 14, 1999, at A17.Google Scholar
See “Physicians Palliative Care Pain Hotline Update,” Maryland Board of Physician Quality Assurance, 9, no. 3 (2001): at 4.Google Scholar
See Meisel, A. Jernigan, J.C. Youngner, S.J., “Prosecutors and End-of-Life Decision Making,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 159 (1999): 1089–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, supra note 24.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.; Personal communication from Ann Dixon, former Deputy Chief Medical Examiner in Baltimore, Maryland, to author (February 25, 2000).Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See Wilber, D.Q. Youssef, N.A., “Son Spared Charges in III Mother's Death,” Baltimore Sun, March 5, 1999, at B-1.Google Scholar
See Hall, M.A. et al., Health Care Law and Ethics in a Nutshell (St. Paul, MN: West Group Press, 1999): At 316.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Thompson, , supra note 67.Google Scholar
See Letter from Jack Schwartz, Assistant Attorney General and Director of Health Policy Development, State of Maryland to Ms. Becky Sutton of Hartley Hall Nursing Home (March 5, 1999) (on file with author).Google Scholar
See Sulmasy, , supra note 68.Google Scholar
See id. at 28.Google Scholar
See Glauber, B., “Scarred by Evil, Haunted by What-Ifs,” Baltimore Sun, February 6, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar
See Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793, 807 n.11 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Md. Code Ann., [Crimes & Punishments] § 27–416.Google Scholar
See Meisel, Jernigan, Youngner, , supra note 88.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See id. at 1094.Google Scholar
See id. at 1091.Google Scholar
See id. at 1091–92.Google Scholar
See Schwartz, J., “Symposium: Trends in Health Care Decisionmaking,” Maryland Law Review, 53 (1994): 1041–43.Google Scholar
78 Op. Att'y Gen. 109 (1993).Google Scholar
See Gorsuch, , supra note 5.Google Scholar
See “Prescribing Controlled Drugs,” Maryland Board of Physician Quality Assurance, 4, no. 1 (1996): 1–3.Google Scholar
See id. at 3.Google Scholar
See supra note 4.Google Scholar
See Siegel, A.F., “Judge Frees Teen Whose Girlfriend Killed Herself,” Baltimore Sun, September 23, 2000, at B-1 (discussing the first case applying Maryland's law banning assisted suicide, in which the court rejected the argument of a teenager accused of providing a firearm to assist in his girlfriend's death that the assisted suicide law should apply only to health-care workers).Google Scholar
Rogers, , supra note 115.Google Scholar
See Alpers, , supra note 106, at 308 (“Although the county attorney [in a 1990 Minnesota case] determined the deaths were homicides, he believed that he had little chance of conviction because the elements of the crime could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”).Google Scholar
See Cantor, Thomas, , supra note 71, at 117 (“A reckless state of mind is sufficiently culpable to prove murder or manslaughter under the MPC. … Under a recklessness framework, the issue shifts from the physician's specific intent to whether the risk created by the analgesics is justified.”).Google Scholar