Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 17, 2007

Participation of the Public in Science: Towards a New Kind of Scientific Practice

  • Isabelle Peschard
From the journal Human Affairs

Participation of the Public in Science: Towards a New Kind of Scientific Practice

Participation of the public in science has been the object of an increasing number of social and political philosophical studies, but there is still hardly any epistemological study of the topic. While it has been objected that involvement of the public is a threat to the integrity of science, the apparent indifference of philosophers of science seems to testify to its lack of relevance to conceptions of scientific activity. I argue both that it is not a threat to science and that it is relevant to philosophy of science by showing that it constitutes a new kind of epistemic practice. Two main objections to the idea that the involvement of non-scientists, with their situated perspective and contextual values, can form an epistemic practice will be addressed: the first bears on the epistemic potentialities of the cooperation between scientist and non-scientists; the second on the possibility that this cooperation takes the form of a practice.

References

Bailor-Jones, D. When Scientific Models Represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59-74, 2003.10.1080/02698590305238Search in Google Scholar

Barad, K.Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2007.10.2307/j.ctv12101zqSearch in Google Scholar

Barnes, B. Practice as collective action. In T. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, L. Science Impact Collaborative Decision Analysis and Joint Fact Finding, LMITUSGS, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, N.The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CBO9781139167093Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, R. P., Franks, B. How Hybrid should a Hybrid Model Be? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Combining Symbolic and Connectionist Processing. 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam, August, 59-67, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, R., Schwarz, G. Connectionism, Computation and Cognition. In T. Horgan, J. Tienson (Eds.). Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.10.1007/978-94-011-3524-5_3Search in Google Scholar

Depraz, N. Francisco Varela's Neurophenomenology of Radical Embodiment. Phenomeno-logy and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 83-95, 2002.10.1023/A:1020324321991Search in Google Scholar

Depraz, N., Varela, F.J., Vermersch, P.On Becoming Aware. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003.10.1075/aicr.43Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, H. Inserting the Public into Science. In S. Maassen and P. Weingart (Eds.). Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Sociology of Sciences, 24, 153-169, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, S.Impure Science: Aids, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Ezrahi, Y.The Descent of Icarus. Science and the Transformation of Modern Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Flicker, S., Savan, B., Kolenda, B., Mildenberger, M. A Snapshot of Community-Based Research in Canada: Who? What? Why? How? Health Education Research, 2007.10.1093/her/cym007Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S., Varela, F.J. Redrawing the Map and Resetting the Time. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 29, 93-127, 2003.10.1080/00455091.2003.10717596Search in Google Scholar

Hisschemoller, M. Knowledge Production and the Limits of Democracy. In S. Maassen and P. Weingart (Eds.). Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Sociology of Sciences, 24,189-207, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, R.I.G. Models and Representation. Philosophy of Science, 64, S325-S336, 1997.10.1086/392611Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. Metaphor-Based Values in Scientific Models. In L. Magnani and N.J. Nersessian (Eds.). Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, 2-19, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Jurgens, I. Science-Stakeholder Dialogue and Climate Change. Towards a Participatory Notion of Communication. In F. Bierman, S. Campe, K. Jacob (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Amsterdam, Berlin, Postdam and Oldenburg: Global Governance Project, 87-101, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Lacey, H.Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Laudan, L.Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Law, J., Mol, A.M. The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001. In L. Malafouris, C. Knappett (Eds.). Material Agency: Towards A Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Springer, forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Leach, M. MMR Mobilisaton: Citizens and Sciences in a British Vaccine Controversy. Working Paper 247, Sussex: Institute of Development Studies, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Leach, M., Scoones, I. Mobilising Citizens: Social Movements and the Politics of Knowledge. Working Paper 276, Sussex: Institute of Development Studies, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, M., Morrisson, M.Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Noë, A., Thompson, E. Are there Neural Correlates of Consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, no 1, 3-28, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, A.The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Potter, E.Feminism and Philosophy of Science. An Introduction. Routledge: New York, 2006.10.4324/9780203646663Search in Google Scholar

Risjord, M. Who are "We"? Dissolving the Problem of Cultural Boundaries. The Modern Schoolman, forthcoming 2007.10.5840/schoolman2007842/312Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, H. McGee, T. Applying Local Knowledge: the Contribution of Oral History to Wetland Rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 69, 275-287, 2003.10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00155-5Search in Google Scholar

Rouse, J.How Scientific Practice Matter. Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Rouse, J. Social Practices and Normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37, 46-56, 2007.10.1177/0048393106296542Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, G., Marsh, R., Frewer, L.J. Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 29, no 1, 88-121, 2004.10.1177/0162243903259194Search in Google Scholar

Turner, S. Throwing out the Tacit Rule Book: Learning and Practices. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 120-130, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, S. The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Suárez, M. Theories, Models and Representation. In L. Magnani and N.J. Nersessian (Eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, 75-83, 1999.10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_5Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C.Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford University Press. forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F.J. The Naturalization of Phenomenology as the Transcendence of Nature. Alter, 5, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L.Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 3rd ed, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Wynne, B. Sheep Farming after Chernobyl. A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information. Environment, 31, 2, 11-39, 1989.10.1080/00139157.1989.9928930Search in Google Scholar

Wynne, B. May Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of The Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In S. Kash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (Eds.). Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 44-83, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2007-12-17
Published in Print: 2007-12-1

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10023-007-0013-x/html
Scroll to top button