Abstract
This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion.
Having clarified this argument, I conclude that although it addresses important issues, it is highly problematic for the following reasons. First, if women are being coerced to desire to use AR, we should eradicate the coercive elements in pro-natalist ideology, not access to AR. Second, the argument seems to have the absurd implication that we should prevent all woman, whether fertile or not, to try to have children. Third, it seems probable that women's welfare will be greater if we let well informed and decision-competent women decide for themselves whether they want to use AR.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Boetzkes, E., Equality, Autonomy and Feminist Bioethics, in A. Donchin and L.M. Purdy (eds.), Embodying Bioethics, Recent Feminist Advances. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999, pp. 121–139.
Brazier, M., Reproductive Rights: Feminism or Patriarchy? in J. Harris and S. Holm (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 66–76.
Brock, D.W., Life and Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Donchin, A., Feminist Critiques of New Fertility Technologies; Implications for Social Policy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1996), pp. 475–498.
Corea, G., The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. The Women's Press, 1988.
Harris, J., Rights and Reproductive Choice, in J. Harris and S. Holm (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 5–37.
Koch, L., IVF-an Irrational Choice?, Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering 3(3), (1990), pp. 235–242.
Lang, S.S., Women Without Children: The Reasons, the Rewards, the Regrets. New York: Pharos Books, 1991.
Nozick, R., Coercion, in P. Laslett, W.G. Runciman and Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 4th Series. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1972, pp. 101–135.
Purdy, L.M., What Can Progress in Reproductive Technology Mean for Women, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1996), pp. 499–514.
Purdy, L.M., Assisted Reproduction, in P. Singer (ed.), Companion to Bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, pp. 163–172.
Robertson J.A., Children of Choice: Freedom and The New Reproductive Technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Rowland, R., Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
Sen, A., Well-being, Agency and Freedom, Journal of Philosophy 82(4) (1985), pp. 169–221.
Singer, P., New Assisted Reproductive Technology, in P. Singer and H. Kuhse (eds.), Bioethics, An Anthology. Blackwell, Oxford, 1999, pp. 99–102.
Sumner, L.W., Welfare, Happiness & Ethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.
Warren M.A., Sex Selection. Individual Choice or Cultural Coercion?, in H. Kuhse and P. Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1999, pp. 137–142.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Søbirk Petersen, T. A Woman's Choice? — On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7, 81–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000019974.63427.ea
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000019974.63427.ea