Skip to main content
Log in

Governmentality, Critical Scholarship, and the Medical Humanities

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foucault's work has had a profound impact on the medical humanities over the last decade or so. However, most work to date has focused on Foucault's earlier writings rather than his later contributions on the self and governmentality. This article assesses the significance of the concept of governmentality for critical scholarship in the medical humanities, particularly in creating ethical awareness in the field of health care. It examines the context for Foucault's later work, and contributions arising from scholarship building on this work. The governmentality literature, it is argued, raises novel questions about the ways we have come to think about health care in late modern societies. However, there are some limitations with this body of work which have not been fully acknowledged by scholars. The article discusses some of these limitations and offers some suggestions for a fruitful way forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. (1983). Political anatomy of the body: Medical knowledge in Britain in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism and rationalities of government. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, J. W. (1991). Michel Foucault's ecstatic thinking. In J. Bernauer & D. Rasmussen, (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 45–82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, J., & Rasmussen, D. (Eds.). (1991). The final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom D. (1991). Damned if we do: Contradiction in women's health care. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1993). Liberal government and techniques of the self. Economy and Society 22, 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., & Watson, P. (1996). Policing sexual violence: Feminism, criminal justice and governmentality. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24, 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1991). Is non-directive counselling possible? The Lancet, 338, 998–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1993). Revolutions within: Self-government and self-esteem. Economy and Society, 22(3), 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., Davey Smith, G., & Frankel, S. (1991). Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: The implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1987). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The care of the self: The history of sexuality (Vol. 3). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. In J. Bernauer & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1997). Governmentality and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2, 173–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & Miller, P. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. E. Wellberg (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and the self in western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. A. (1994). Motherhood and the obfuscation of medical knowledge: The case of sickle cell disease. Gender and Society, 8(1), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. (1997). Health promotion and non-compliance: An analysis of resistance to regulatory technologies. Annual Review of Health Social Sciences, 7, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, R. (1996). Losing patients: Health care consumers, power and sociocultural change. In C. Grbich, (Ed.), Health in Australia: Sociological concepts and issues (pp. 191–214). Sydney: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, G. (1996). ‘Responsibility’ as a strategy of governance: Regulating people living with AIDS and lesbians and gay men in Ontario. Economy and Society, 25(3), 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, L. D. (Ed.). (1988). Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, C. (1999). From entitlement to obligation in the Australian welfare state. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 34(2), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (1992). Foucault and feminism: Power, gender and the self. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S. (1992). Pain, power and dentistry. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, P. (1996a). Indigenous governance. Economy and Society, 25(3), 310–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, P. (1996b). Risk and responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose, (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 189–208). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, P. (1998). Consuming risks: Harm minimisation and the government of drug users. In R. Smandych (Ed.), Governable places: Readings in governmentality and crime (pp. 191–214). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, P., Weir, L., & Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26(4), 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. (1998). The new genetics and the politics of public health. Critical Public Health, 8(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. (1999). Counselling the genetically “at risk”: The poetics and politics of “nondirectiveness.” Health, Risk and Society, 3(1), 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 22(3), 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power and the body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, A. (1998). Wrongful life lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue? Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice: Social relations in the clinic. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenson, K. (1998). Beyond histories of the present. Economy and Society, 27(4), 333–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (1997). Forward: From governmentality to risk, some reflections on Foucault's contribution to medical sociology. In A. Petersen & Bunton, R. (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. ix-xxi). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (1996). “Despotism” and ethical liberal governance. Economy and Society, 25(3), 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, L. (1996). Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society, 25(3), 372–392.-

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, A. Governmentality, Critical Scholarship, and the Medical Humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 24, 187–201 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026002202396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026002202396

Navigation