Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Decision-Making In An Emergency Department

Findings On Nursing Advocacy

  • Article
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to share with the reader the specific findings on the role of nurse as consumer advocate from a study on ethical decision-making in an emergency department (ED). Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 health professionals (doctors and nurses) working in the ED of a hospital. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

In ED, where the decision-making is described as medico-centric, advocacy ipso facto necessitates a challenge to doctor decision-making. The findings indicate that ED nurses experience with advocacy varied depending on the democratic qualities and communication skills of the particular doctor who had care of the consumer. It is noted that seeing the need for advocacy does not necessarily translate into effective action, as management support is essential for productive advocacy. A phenomenon of the desire not to rock the boat was reported. The findings indicate that the support of other nurses is essential for advocacy and affirm the importance of focusing on the ethical nature of the organisation as opposed to an exclusive focus on the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrom, G. et. al. 1995. ‘Nurses’ skills in managing ethically difficult care situations: interpretation of nurses’ narratives’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21(6): 1073–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwal, A.; Caldwell, K. 2005. ‘Do all health and social care professionals interact equally?: A study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom’. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19: 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, M.; Ersser, S. 2004. ‘Medical hegemony in decision-making — a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care?’ Journal of Advanced Nursing 46: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, M. et. al. 2005. ‘Nurse moral distress and ethical work environment’. Nursing Ethics 12: 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, L. 1979. ‘The nurse as advocate: A philosophical foundation for nursing’. Advances in Nursing Science 1(3): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, S. 1980. ‘Existential advocacy: Philosophical foundation of nursing’. In Nursing: Images and Ideals, edited by Spricker, S.F.; Gadow, S. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord, N.; Grace, P. 1995. ‘Nursing advocacy: An ethic of practice’. Nursing Ethics 2(1): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gearing, R.E. 2004. ‘Bracketing in research: a typology’. Qualitative Health Research 14(10): 1429–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A; Giorgi, B. 2004. ‘The descriptive phenomenological psychology-cal method’. In Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, edited by Camic, P. et. al. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. 2007. Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, R. 2005. ‘Sphere of nursing advocacy model’. Nursing Forum 40(3): 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, R. 2007. ‘Barriers to nursing advocacy: a concept analysis’. Nursing Forum 42(4): 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. 2002. ‘A critical review of the arguments debating the role of the nurse advocate’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 37: 339–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, I. 2008. A–Z of Qualitative Research in Healthcare. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, D. 2002. ‘An exploration of the relationship between patient autonomy and patient advocacy: implications for nursing practice’. Nursing Ethics 9: 472–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnke, M. 1982. Advocacy: Risk and Reality. St Louis: CV Mosby C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. 2007. Doing Interviews. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian, J. 2005. ‘The dance of advocacy’. Journal of Perinatal Education 14: 36–39.

  • McGrath, A.; Walker, A. 1999. ‘Nurses’ perception and experiences of advocacy’. Contemporary Nurse 8(3): 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P. et al. 2006. ‘Patient-centred care: Qualitative findings on health professionals understanding of ethics in acute medicine’. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3(3): 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P. et al. 2007. ‘Nursing advocacy in an Australian multidisciplinary context: Findings on medicocentrism’. Scandinavian Journal of the Caring Sciences 20(4): 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P.; Henderson, D. 2008a. ‘“Oh, that’s a really hard question”: Australian findings on ethical reflection in an accident and emergency ward’. HEC Forum 20(4): 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P.; Henderson, D. 2008b. ‘Resolving end of life ethical concerns: Important palliative care practice development issues for acute medicine in Australia’. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 25(3): 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P.; Holewa, H. 2006. ‘Ethical decision making in an acute medical ward: Australian findings on dealing with conflict and tension’. Ethics and Behavior 16(3): 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSteen, K.; Peden-McAlpine, C. 2006. ‘The role of the nurse as advocate in ethically difficult care situations with dying patients’. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 8 (5): 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitty, E. 1991. ‘The nurse as advocate: Issues in LTC’. Nursing Health Care 12: 520–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. 1998. ‘Hospital nurses’ perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting’. Image Journal of Nursing Scholarship 30: 345–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, K. 2000. ‘Advocacy in perioperative nursing practice’. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses Journal 71: 1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, N. 2005. ‘Our roots in nursing: Advocacy and activism’. Nebraska Nurse May: 3.

  • Soderberg, A.; Norberg, A. 1993. ‘Intensive care: Situations of ethical difficulty’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18(12): 2008–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uden, G. et al. 1995. ‘The stories of physicians, registered nurses and enrolled nurses about ethically difficult care episodes in surgical care’. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 9(4): 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaartio, H. et al. 2006. ‘Nursing advocacy; how is it defined by patients and nurses, what does it involve and how is it experienced?’ Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 20: 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welchman, J.; Griener, G. 2005. ‘Patient advocacy and professional associations: Individual and collective responsibilities’. Nursing Ethics 12(3): 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGrath, P., Phillips, E. Ethical Decision-Making In An Emergency Department. Monash Bioethics Review 28, 38–53 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351312

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351312

Keywords

Navigation