Abstract
Aristotle claims that in some extenuating circumstances, the correct response to the wrongdoer is sungnōmē rather than blame. Sungnōmē has a wide spectrum of meanings that include aspects of sympathy, pity, fellow-feeling, pardon, and excuse, but the dominant interpretation among scholars takes Aristotle’s meaning to correspond most closely to forgiveness. Thus, it is commonly held that the virtuous Aristotelian agent ought to forgive wrongdoers in specific extenuating circumstances. Against the more popular forgiveness interpretation, I begin by defending a positive account of sungnōmē as the correct judgment that a wrongdoer deserves excuse since she was not blameworthy. I will then argue that as sungnōmē is merited on the grounds of fairness, this shows that both the forgiveness interpretation and a third, alternative interpretation of sungnōmē as sympathy mischaracterize both the justification for sungnōmē and its nature. Moreover, I will argue that Aristotle not only lacks an account of forgiveness but in fact, his account of blame is incompatible with forgiveness altogether.
References
Broadie, S. 2002. The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1999. “Rule and Exception: On the Aristotelian Theory of Equity.” In Rationality in Greek Thought, edited by M. Frede, and G. Striker, 115–55. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1900. The Ethics of Aristotle. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2005. “Nicomachean Ethics VII.1-2: Introduction, Method, Puzzles.” In Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Natali, 9–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2013. “Aristotelian Responsibility.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45:265–312.Search in Google Scholar
Cope, E. M., and J. E. Sandys. 1877. The Rhetoric of Aristotle with a Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Curzer, H. J. 2012. Aristotle and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2006. The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Downie, R. S. 1965. “Forgiveness.” Philosophical Quarterly 15:128–34.Search in Google Scholar
Echeñique, J. 2012. Aristotle’s Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and J. Y. Jolif. 1959. L’ethique À Nicomaque. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Search in Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. 2007. Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hewitt, A. 2008. “Universal Justice and Epieikeia in Aristotle.” Polis 25 (1):115–30.Search in Google Scholar
Hughes, P. M. “Forgiveness.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries /forgiveness/.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1980. “Reason and Responsibility in Aristotle.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, edited by A. Rorty, 117–55. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, V. 2005. Forgiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kekes, J. 2009. “Blame Versus Forgiveness.” The Monist 92 (4):488–506.Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1979. Aristotle’s Theory of the Will. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2008. “Assuaging Rage: Remorse, Repentance, and Forgiveness in the Classical World.” Phoenix 62 (3/4):243–54.Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2010. Before Forgiveness: The Origins of a Moral Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacLachlan, A. The Nature and Limits of Forgiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University. 2008. Ann Arbor: ProQuest/UMI, 2008. (Publication No. 3279942.)Search in Google Scholar
Morton, A. 2012. “What Is Forgiveness?.” In Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian, edited by C. L. Griswold and D. Konstan, 3–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, J. G., and J. Hampton. 1988. Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Natali, C. 2005. “Nicomachean Ethics VII.5-6: Beastliness, Irascibility, Akrasia.” In Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Natali, 103–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
North, J. 1987. “Wrongdoing and Forgiveness.” Philosophy 62 (242):499–508.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1993. “Equity and Mercy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (2):83–125.Search in Google Scholar
Rackham, H. 1934. Aristotle: The Athenian Constitution, the Eudemian Ethics, on Virtues and Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2013. Aristotle on Practical Wisdom: Nicomachean Ethics VI. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sadler, G. 2008. “Forgiveness, Anger, and Virtue in an Aristotelean Perspective.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:229–47.Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980. Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sparshott, F. 1994. Taking Life Seriously: A Study of the Argument of the Nicomachean Ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stewart, J. A. 1892. Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. 1988. Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford, New York: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
