Skip to main content
Log in

The challenge of religious pluralism: A reply to James Kraft

  • Panel Discussion
  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Religious pluralis does have, as James Kraft says, a negative impact on the epistemic confidence with which one holds a religious position, when epistemology is thought on both the externalist and internalist lines. I also conclude both that there is a resulting epistemic humility and that a tolerance of religious diversity results from it, but I reach these conclusions for entirely different reasons. Epistemic humility and religious tolerance are fostered by the realization that many religions are striving for the infinite, though all have limited views of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Phillips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, S. The challenge of religious pluralism: A reply to James Kraft. SOPHIA 45, 123–126 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782486

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782486

Keywords

Navigation