Skip to main content
Log in

Ties that Unwind: Dynamism in Integrative Social Contracts Theory1

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social contract theory offers a powerful method and metaphor for the study of organizational ethics. This paper considers the variant of the social contract that has arguably gained the most attention among business ethicists: integrative social contracts theory or ISCT [Donaldson and Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind (Harvard Business School Press, Boston)]. A core precept of ISCT – that consent to membership in an organization entails obligations to follow the norms of that organization, subject to the moral minimums of basic human rights – is a reasonable and appealing notion. One potential challenge for those attempting to apply this idea, however, lies in the dynamic nature of social norms. Organizational norms evolve, often through the conscious efforts of community members and leaders. As currently formulated, ISCT offers a framework that under-appreciates the evolving nature of moral norms. In this paper, we extend ISCT by considering the circumstances under which the terms of and parties to social contracts change. We also consider a number of principles that should be considered as the terms and parties to organizational social contracts change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badaracco J. L. Jr. (1997) Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose Between Right and Right. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker L. (1986) Reciprocity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore K. (2003) Stable Social Contracts. In: Heugens P., J. (Hans) van Oosterhout, Vromen J. (eds) Social Institutions of Capitalism: Evolution and Design of Social Contracts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright J. (2000) Contract Theory and Business Ethics: A Review of Ties that Bind. Business and Society Review 105(4): 452–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton J. M., Payne S. L. (2003) Coping With Paradox: Multistakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Pluralist Sensemaking Process for Addressing Messy Problems. Business & Society 42(1):7–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton J. M. (2001) Book Reviews: Ties That Bind. Business and Society 40(2): 220–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini R. B. (1984) Influence. William Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin A. (1952) Corbin on Contracts. West Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P. J. (1991) Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: US Art Museums 1920–1940. In: Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 267–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. (1999) Ties That Bind. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T. and Dunfee T. W. (2000) Securing the ties that bind: a response to commentators. Business and Society Review 105(4): 480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman W. and Santoro M. (2003) The Importance of Value Diversity in Corporate Life. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4):433–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. and Gilbert D. R. Jr. (1988) Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller L. L. (1964) The Morality of Law. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann A. and Thompson D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J: 1990, ‘Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification’, in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen (trans.), (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)

  • Hannan M. T. and Freeman J. (1977) The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman E. M. (1996) Organizational Ethics and the Good Life. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens P., van Oosterhout H. and Vromen J. (eds) (2003) Social Institutions of Capitalism: Evolution and Design of Social Contracts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman A. (1997) From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. The New Lexington Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Cramer, M.: 2003, Organization-level Antecedents of Stakeholder Conflict, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University

  • Jones T. M. (1995) Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review 20(2): 404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter J. P. (1996) Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1690, Second Treatise of Government

  • McMahon C. (1981) Morality and the Invisible Hand. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10(3): 247–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R. (1974) Anarchy State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R. (2003) Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R.A. (1997) Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R. A., Margolis J. M. (1999) Toward an Ethics of Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 619–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1993) Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan J. (2001) Review: Thomas Donaldson and Thomas Dunfee, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2): 379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott W. R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P. (1949) TVA and the Grassroots. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D.: 2004, ‘A Précis of a Communicative Theory of the Firm’, Business Ethics: A European Review 13(4)

  • Solomon R.C. (1993) Ethics and Excellence: Co-operation and Integrity in Business. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout, J. (Hans), P. M. A. R. Heugens and M. Kaptein: forthcoming, ‘The Internal Morality of Contracting: Advancing the Contractualist Endeavor in Business Ethics’, Academy of Management Review

  • Walzer M. (1994) Thick and Thin. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Phillips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, R.A., Johnson-Cramer, M.E. Ties that Unwind: Dynamism in Integrative Social Contracts Theory1 . J Bus Ethics 68, 283–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9015-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9015-7

Keywords

Navigation