Abstract
Our linguistic communication often takes the form of creating texts. In this paper, we propose that creating texts or ‘texting’ is a form of joint action. We examine the nature and evolution of this joint action. We argue that creating texts ushers in a special type of joint action, which, while lacking some central features of normal, everyday joint actions such as spatio-temporal collocation of agency and embodiment, nonetheless results in an authentic, strong, and unique type of joint action agency. This special type of agency is already present in creating texts in general and is further augmented in creating texts through digital media. We propose that such a unique type of joint action agency has a transformative effect on the experience of our sense of agency and subjectivity. We conclude with the implications of the proposal for social cognition and social agency. The paper combines research in philosophy of mind with the emerging fields of digital humanities and text technology.
References
Alac, M., and E. Hutchins. 2004. “I See What You Are Saying: Action as Cognition in fMRI Brain Mapping Practice.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 629–61.10.1163/1568537042484977Search in Google Scholar
Aldunate, N., and R. González-Ibáñez. 2017. “An Integrated Review of Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 2061, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02061.Search in Google Scholar
Avramides, A. 1989. Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Bradford Books.Search in Google Scholar
Bjørndahl, J. S., R. Fusaroli, S. Østergaard, and K. Tylén. 2015. “Agreeing is Not Enough: The Constructive Role of Miscommunication.” Interaction Studies 16 (3): 495–525.10.1075/is.16.3.07fusSearch in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1992. “Shared Cooperative Activity.” Philosophical Review 101 (2): 327–41, https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537.Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1993. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104: 97–113, https://doi.org/10.1086/293577.Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bolt, N. K., E. M. Poncelet, B. G. Schultz, and J. D. Loehr. 2016. “Mutual Coordination Strengthens the Sense of Joint Agency in Cooperative Joint Action.” Consciousness and Cognition 46: 173–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.001.Search in Google Scholar
Butterfill, S. A. 2011. “Joint Action and Development.” The Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246): 23–47, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00005.x.Search in Google Scholar
Butterfill, S. A., and N. Sebanz. 2011. “Joint Action: What is Shared?” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2): 137–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0062-3.Search in Google Scholar
Cahn, J. E., and S. E. Brennan. 1999. “A Psychological Model of Grounding and Repair in Dialog.” In Proceedings Fall 1999 AAAI Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, 25–33. North Falmouth, MA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., and S. E. Brennan. 1991. “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, edited by L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, 127–49. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10096-006Search in Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., and E. F. Schaefer. 1989. “Contributing to Discourse.” Cognitive Science 13: 259–94, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, T. J., M. A. Riley, K. Shockley, and S. Cummins-Sebree. 2010. “Perceiving Affordances for Joint Actions.” Perception 39: 1624–44, https://doi.org/10.1068/p6712.Search in Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. 2004. Truth and Method, 2nd revised ed. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar
Gallese, V., and A. Goldman. 1998. “Mirror Neurons and the Simulation Theory of Mind-Reading.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 493–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5.Search in Google Scholar
Gallese, V., L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and G. Rizzolatti. 1996. “Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex.” Brain 119: 593–609, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. 2009. “Shared Intention and Personal Intentions.” Philosophical Studies 144: 167–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9372-z.Search in Google Scholar
Gold, N., and R. Sugden. 2007. “Collective Intentions and Team Agency.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (3): 109–37, https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2007104328.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66 (3): 377–88, https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 2013. Wittgenstein: Comparisons and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674824.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hobson, P. 2002. The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking. Oxford: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Jankovic, M. 2014. “Communication and Shared Information.” Philosophical Studies 169 (3): 489–508, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0205-8.Search in Google Scholar
Johannessen, K. S. 1988. “The Concept of Practice in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy.” Inquiry 31 (3): 357–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748808602161.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, K. W., S. W. Lee, J. Choi, T. M. Kim, and B. Jeong. 2016. “Neural Correlates of Text-Based Emoticons: A Preliminary fMRI Study.” Brain Behav 10 (8): e00500, https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.500.Search in Google Scholar
Kiverstein, J., ed. 2017 The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Mind. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315530178Search in Google Scholar
Lindblom, J. 2015. “Meaning-making as a Socially Distributed and Embodied Practice.” In Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind: Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy. Contributions to Phenomenology (In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology), Vol. 73, edited by A. Scarinzi. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_1Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, M., R. P. R. D. van der Wel, and S. Hunnius. 2016. “Planning My Actions to Accommodate Yours: Joint Action Development during Early Childhood.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371 (1693): 20150371, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0371.Search in Google Scholar
Nathan, M. J. 2008. “An Embodied Cognition Perspective on Symbols, Gesture, and Grounding Instruction.” In Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, edited by M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, and A. Graesser, 375–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0018Search in Google Scholar
Nomikou, I., G. Leonardi, A. Radkowska, J. Rączaszek-Leonardi, and K. J. Rohlfing. 2017. “Taking up an Active Role: Emerging Participation in Early Mother–Infant Interaction During Peekaboo Routines.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1656, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01656.Search in Google Scholar
Pichler, A. 1995. “Transcriptions, Texts and Interpretation.” In Culture and Value. Beiträge des 18. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums, edited by K. S. Johannessen, and T. Nordenstam, 690–695. Kirchberg a.W: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.Search in Google Scholar
Pichler, A. In Press. “Hierarchical or Non-hierarchical? A Philosophical Approach to a Debate in Text Encoding.” Digital Humanities Quarterly.Search in Google Scholar
Pichler, A., and T. M. Bruvik. 2014. “Digital Critical Editing: Separating Encoding from Presentation.” In Digital Critical Editions, edited by D. Apollon, C. Bélisle, and P. Régnier, 179–202. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reddy, V. 2008. How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674033887Search in Google Scholar
Rettberg, S. 2005. “All Together Now: Collective Knowledge, Collective Narratives, and Architectures of Participation.” In Proceedings of the 2005 Digital Arts and Culture Conference. Copenhagen, DK. http://retts.net/documents/cnarrativeDAC.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, M. J., R. C. Schmidt, R. Dale, R. W. Kallen, and J. Raczaszek-Leonardi. 2018. Dynamics of Joint-Action, Social Coordination and Multi-Agent Activity. Lausanne: Frontiers Media.10.3389/978-2-88945-420-4Search in Google Scholar
Rochat, P. 2004. The Infant’s World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042810Search in Google Scholar
Sacheli, L. M., S. M. Aglioti, and M. Candidi. 2015. “Social Cues to Joint Actions: The Role of Shared Goals.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1034, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01034.Search in Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., H. Bekkering, and G. Knoblich. 2006. “Joint Action: Bodies and Minds Moving Together.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 70–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009.Search in Google Scholar
Shin, Y. W., J. S. Kwon, K. W. Kwon, B. M. Gu, I. C. Song, D. G. Na, and S. Park. 2008. “Objects and their Icons in the Brain: The Neural Correlates of Visual Concept Formation.” Neuroscience Letters 436: 300–4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.047.Search in Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D. 2005. “Let’s Pretend: Children and Joint Action.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (75): 74–97, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104271925.Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., and M. Carpenter. 2007. “Shared Intentionality.” Developmental Science 10 (1): 121–5, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x.Search in Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. 1998. “The Concept and Foundations of Intersubjectivity.” In Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, edited by S. Braten, 15–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tronick, E., H. Als, L. Adamson, S. Wise, and T. B. Brazelton. 1978. “The Infant’s Response to Entrapment between Contradictory Messages in Face-To-Face Interaction.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 17: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-7138(09)62273-1.Search in Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. 2006. “Joint Intention, We-Mode and I-Mode.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 30 (1): 35–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00127.x.Search in Google Scholar
Vesper, C., S. Butterfill, G. Knoblich, and N. Sebanz. 2010. “A Minimal Architecture for Joint Action.” Neural Networks 23 (8–9): 998–1003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002.Search in Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. A. 2017. “Mediated Action.” In A Companion to Cognitive Science, edited by W. Bechtel, and G. Graham, 518–25. UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781405164535.ch40Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2015. “Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition. Ed. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen Under the Direction of Alois Pichler.” In Wittgenstein Source (2009–) [wittgensteinsource.org]. Bergen: University of Bergen.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2016. Interactive Dynamic Presentation (IDP) of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophical Nachlass. Ed. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen Under the Direction of Alois Pichler [wittgensteinonline.no/]. Bergen: University of Bergen.Search in Google Scholar
Yuasa, M., K. Saito, and N. Mukawa. 2006. “Emoticons Convey Emotions Without Cognition of Faces: An fMRI Study.” In Proceedings of CHI EA ’06 CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1565–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125737.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
