Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer ethics: The role of personal, informal, and formal codes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical decisions related to computer technology and computer use are subject to three primary influences: (1) the individual's own personal code (2) any informal code of ethical behavior that exists in the work place, and (3) exposure to formal codes of ethics. The relative importance of these codes, as well as factors influencing these codes, was explored in a nationwide survey of information system (IS) professionals. The implications of the findings are important to educators and employers in the development of acceptable ethical standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. and L. Cornwell: 1989, ‘A Question of Ethics: Developing Information System Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creating A Workable Company Code of Ethics: 1990 (Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC).

  • Ernst & Whinney: 1989, ‘The 1989 Computer Abuse Survey: A Report’, Pamphlet (Ernst & Whinney, 2000 National City Center, Cleveland, OH, 44114).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, W. G., and B. McMenamin: December 21, 1992, ‘The Playground Bullies Are Learning How to Type’, Forbes Magazine, 184–189.

  • Gardner, E. P., L. B. Samuels, B. Render and R. L. Coffinberger: Fall 1989, ‘The Importance of Ethical Standards and Computer Crime Laws for Data Security’, Journal of Information Systems Management, 42–50.

  • Gray, A. P. and R. J. Perle: 1992, ‘Attitudes on Legality Versus Ethics in Software Copyrights’, Interface 14(4), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G.: 1985, Computer Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallman, E. A.: 1992, ‘Developing a Code for Ethical Computer Use’, Journal of Systems Software 17, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molander, E. A.: 1987, ‘A Paradigm for Design, Promulgation and Enforcement of Ethical Codes’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradice, D. B.: 1990, ‘Ethical Attitudes of Entry-Level MIS Personnel’, Information and Management 18, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelfrey, S., and E. Peacock: 1991, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct Are Improving’, Business Forum 16(2), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, T. R., M. C. Gentile, and S. D. Parks: 1983, Can Ethics Be Taught? (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, V. F., and E. Zureik: 1990, ‘Correlates of Computer Misuse: Data from a Self-Reporting Sample’, Behaviour and Information Technology 9(5), 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., and J. E. Houston: 1990, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics’, Management Decisions 28(7), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. W., Jr., W. D. Nance, and C. L. Carlson: 1990, ‘Discovering and Discipline Computer Abuse in Organizations: A Field Study’, MIS Quarterly 14(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahn, J.: 1993, ‘Organizational Dependence and the Likelihood of Complying with Organizational Pressures to Behave Unethically’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., and D. R. Goodenough: 1977, ‘Field Dependence and Interpersonal Behavior’, Psychological Bulletin 84, 661–689.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia Southern University, 30460-8093, Statesboro, GA, U.S.A.

    Margaret Anne Pierce & John W. Henry

Authors
  1. Margaret Anne Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John W. Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Margaret Anne Pierce is a Full Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA. She teaches primarily computer science courses, and her research interests include computer science undergraduate education, study of random number generators, and computer ethics. Her work is found in publications such as Computers in Human Behavior, Mathematics and Computer Education, Simulation, and regional and national proceedings.

John W. Henry is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Management at Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA. His research interests are information systems use in health care contexts, implementation of medical information systems, and the determinants of end-user technology success. His work is found in publications such as Executive Development, Computers in Human Behavior, and regional and national proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, M.A., Henry, J.W. Computer ethics: The role of personal, informal, and formal codes. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 425–437 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380363

Keywords

Search

Navigation