Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T01:26:28.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on finitely generated models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Anand Pillay*
Affiliation:
Université De Paris VII, 75221 Paris, France

Extract

A model M (of a countable first order language) is said to be finitely generated if it is prime over a finite set, namely if there is a finite tuple ā in M such that (M, ā) is a prime model of its own theory. Similarly, if AM, then M is said to be finitely generated overA if there is finite ā in M such that M is prime over Aā. (Note that if Th(M) has Skolem functions, then M being prime over A is equivalent to M being generated by A in the usual sense, that is, M is the closure of A under functions of the language.) We show here that if N is ā model of an ω-stable theory, MN, M is finitely generated, and N is finitely generated over M, then N is finitely generated. A corollary is that any countable model of an ω-stable theory is the union of an elementary chain of finitely generated models. Note again that all this is trivial if the theory has Skolem functions.

The result here strengthens the results in [3], where we show the same thing but assuming in addition that the theory is either nonmultidimensional or with finite αT. However the proof in [3] for the case αT finite actually shows the following which does not assume ω-stability): Let A be atomic over a finite set, tp(ā / A) have finite Cantor-Bendixson rank, and B be atomic over Aā. Then B is atomic over a finite set.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Lascar, D., Ordre de Rudin Keisler et Poids dans les théories stables (to appear).Google Scholar
[2]Lascar, D. and Poizat, B., Introduction to forking, this Journal, vol. 44, no. 3 (1979), pp. 330350.Google Scholar
[3]Pillay, A., Finitely generated models of ω-stable theories, Proceedings of the Logic Meeting at Brussels and Mons in June 1980 Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de Belgique, Serie B, vol. 23, fascicule I (1981).Google Scholar
[4]Shelah, S., Classification theory and the number of nonisomorphic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar