Abstract
This study has been designed to investigate whether Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) orientations have shifted in their priority in response to society's changing expectations. For this sample of U.S.-based multinational chemical subsidiaries, it appears that the top priority continues to be economic responsibilities, followed closely by legal responsibilities.
A socially accountable corporation ... must be a thoughtful institution, able to rise above economic interest to anticipate the impact of its actions on all individuals and groups, from shareholders to employees to customers, to fellow-breathers of the air and fellow-sharers of the land. A successful business organization must possess a moral sense as well as an economic sense (Thornton Bradshaw, President of Atlantic Richfield Co. inBusiness and Society: Strategies for the 1980's, 1980, p. xiv).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aupperle, K. E.: 1982, An empirical inquiry into the social responsibilities as defined by corporations: An examination of various models and relationships (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1982).
Bhambri, A. and J. Sonnenfeld: 1988, ‘Organizational Structure and Corporate Social Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 31, 642–662.
Brenner, S. N. and E. A Molander: 1977, ‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing’,Harvard Business Review, Jan.–Feb., 57–71.
Business and Society: Strategies for the 1980's: 1980 (Department of Commerce, Washington).
Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’,Business Horizons, July–Aug., 39–48.
Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three Dimensional Model of Corporate Performance’,Academy of Management Review 4, 497–505.
Corson, J. J. and G. A. Steiner: 1974,Measuring Business Social Performance: The Corporate Social Audit (Committee for Economic Development, New York).
Cowton, C.: 1987, ‘Corporate Philanthropy in the United Kingdom’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, 553–558.
Dierkes, M.: 1980, ‘Corporate Social Reporting and Performance in Germany’, in L. E. Preston (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 2 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 251–289.
Elibert, H. and R. I. Parket: 1973, ‘The Practice of Business: The Current Status of Corporate Social Responsibility’,Business Horizons 16, 5–14.
Friedman, M.: 1962, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’,New York Times, Sept., p. 126.
Holmes, S. L.: 1977, ‘Corporate Social Performance: Past and Present Area of Commitment’,Academy of Management Journal 20, 433–538.
Lerner, L. D. and G. E. Fryxell: 1988, ‘An Empirical Study of the Predictors of Corporate Social Performance: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, 951–959.
Longnecker, J. G.: 1985, ‘Management Priorities and Management Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 4, 65–70.
MacMillan, I.: 1980, ‘Corporate Social Responsiveness to the Unemployment Issue: A British Perspective’, in L. E. Preston (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 2 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 327–352.
Moore, C. and J. Richardson: 1988, ‘The Politics and Practice of Corporate Responsibility in Great Britain’, in L. E. Preston (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 10 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 267–290.
Ostlund, L. E.: 1977, ‘Attitudes of Managers toward Corporate Social Policy’,California Management Review 19, 35–49.
Paluszek, J. L.: 1976,Business and Society: 1976–2000 (AMACOM, New York).
Pinkston, T. S.: 1991, ‘“Corporate Citizenship”: A Comparative Analysis of Foreign Affiliates Located in the U.S. and Their Domestic Counterparts’ (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1991).
Public Affairs in the United States and Europe: 1971 (The Conference Board, New York).
The Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Profiles in Involvement: 1975 (Chilton Book Co., Radnor, PA).
Wartick, S. L. and P. L. Cochran: 1985, ‘The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Mode’,Academy of Management Review 10, 758–769.
Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’,Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Tammie Pinkston is Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at the University of Oklahoma. She is a recent recipient of American Brands International Business Scholar Award. Tammie is an active member of the Academy of Management, the International Association for Business & Society, the Southern Management Association, and the Academy of International Business.
Archie B. Carroll is holder of the Robert W. Scherer Chair of Management and Corporate Public Affairs at the University of Georgia. He has published 11 books and over 65 articles in such journals as the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Ethics.He is currently on the Editorial Board of Business Ethics Quarterlyand the board of the International Association for Business & Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinkston, T.S., Carroll, A.B. A retrospective examination of CSR orientations: Have they changed?. J Bus Ethics 15, 199–206 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705587
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705587