Greetings from the Pink Palace: An Architecturally, Paranormally, and Politically Accurate Ghost Story
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v17i3.4337Keywords:
nursing homes, long term care, Canadian politics, ghost storiesReferences
Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (Eds.). (2020). The privatization of care: The case of nursing homes. Routledge.
Badone, E. (2021). From cruddiness to catastrophe: COVID-19 and long-term care in Ontario. Medical Anthropology, 40(5), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.1927023
Banerjee, A., & Armstrong, P. (2015). Centring care: Explaining regulatory tensions in residential care for older persons. Studies in Political Economy, 95(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2015.11674944
Banerjee, A., Armstrong, P., Daly, T., Armstrong, H., & Braedley, S. (2015). “Careworkers don't have a voice:” Epistemological violence in residential care for older people. Journal of Aging Studies, 33, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.02.005
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
Coulter, K. (2009). Patriarchy at the Pink Palace: Gender and work inside the Ontario Legislature. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 34(1), 16-26. https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/215
Daly, T. (2015). Dancing the two-step in Ontario’s long-term care sector: deterrence regulation= consolidation. Studies in Political Economy, 95(1), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2015.11674945
Daly, T., Struthers, J., Müller, B., Taylor, D., Goldmann, M., Doupe, M., & Jacobsen, F. F. (2016). Prescriptive or interpretive regulation at the frontlines of care work in the “three worlds” of Canada, Germany and Norway. Labour, 77, 37-71. https://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/view/5821
Graham, C., Himick, D., & Nappert, P. L. (2023). The dissipation of corporate accountability: Deaths of the elderly in for-profit care homes during the coronavirus pandemic. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. [ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102595
Harrington, C., Jacobsen, F. F., Panos, J., Pollock, A., Sutaria, S., & Szebehely, M. (2017). Marketization in long-term care: A cross-country comparison of large for-profit nursing home chains. Health Services Insights, 10, 1-23. DOI: 1178632917710533.
Leslie, K. (2020. July 19). Real long-term care reform demands more than finger-pointing and spin. The Hamilton Spectator. https://www.thespec.com/opinion/contributors/2020/07/19/real-long-term-care-reform-demands-morethan-finger-pointing-and-spin.html
McEwan, C. (2008). A very modern ghost: Postcolonialism and the politics of enchantment. Environment and Planning, 26(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1068/d460
Ontario Long Term Care Association (OLCTA) (2018). This is long-term care 2018. https://www.oltca.com/OLTCA/Documents/Reports/ThisIsLongTermCare2018.pdf.
Oved, M.C., Wallace, K. & Tubb, E. (2022, May 27). Doug Ford is spending billions to expand nursing home chains with some of the worst COVID-19 death rates. Toronto Star. https://www.ontariohealthcoalition.ca/index.php/doug-ford-is-spending-billions-to-expand-nursing-home-chains-with-some-of-the-worst-covid-19-death-rates/
Paling, E. (2020, November 30). Ontario PCs have raked in $30k from big nursing home lobbyists. Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/ontario-nursing-home-lobbyists-pc-party-donations_ca_5fc53f95c5b63d1b770e8a4d
Pinto, L.E. (2012). Curriculum reform in Ontario: ‘Common sense’ policy processes and democratic possibilities. University of Toronto Press.
Williams, A. P., Lum, J., Morton-Chang, F., Kuluski, K., Peckham, A., Warrick, N., & Ying, A. (2016). Integrating long-term care into a community-based continuum: Shifting from beds to places. IRPP Study, 59. http://irpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/study-no59.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Laura Elizabeth Pinto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.