Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

History and philosophy complement and overlap each other in subject matter, but the two disciplines exhibit conflict over methodology. Since Hempel's challenge to historians that they should adopt the covering law model of explanation, the methodological conflict has revolved around the respective roles of the general and the particular in each discipline. In recent years, the revival of narrativism in history, coupled with the trend in philosophy of science to rely upon case studies, joins the methodological conflict anew. So long as contemporary philosophy of science relies upon history's methodology to construct its case studies, it subjects itself to a paradoxical situation: the better the history, the worse the philosophy. An example of the methodological conflict is presented in the case of Antoine Lavoisier. This example also serves our ultimateconclusion, which is that distinctively philosophical methods of case-study design promise enhanced prescriptive powers for philosophy of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aydelotte, William O.: 1986, 'Notes on Historical Generalization', pp. 145-178 in Gottschalk, Louis. (ed.) Generalization in the Writing of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankersmit, F.R.: 1986, 'The Dilemma of Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Philosophy of History', pp. 1-27 in Ankersmit, F.R. (ed.) History and Theory 25 Knowing and Telling History: The Anglo-Saxon Debate. Middlebury CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R.C. and Cohen, R.S. (eds.): 1971, PSA 1970 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. v. 8). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.M.: 1977, 'More Than a Marriage of Convenience: On the Inextricability of History and Philosophy of Science', Philosophy of Science 44, 1-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, Herbert: 1935, The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, Robert and Hintikka, Jakko (eds.).: 1977, Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, Benedetto: 1951, Primi Saggi. 3rd Ed. Bari: G. Laterza and Figli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E. J.: 1961, The Mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Arthur, Larry Laudan and Rachel Laudan (eds.): 1988, Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Arthur: 1994, Antoine Lavoisier. Science, Administration, and Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell's Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Brian, Golob, Eigene O., and Richard T. Vann (eds.): 1987, Louis O. Mink Historical Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro, Maurice: 1973, History of Science as Explanation. Wayne State University Press, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, George: 1979, Theory of Science. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: 1973, 'History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, 282-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, David: 1997, 'Review of Jed Z. Buchwald (ed.) Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, Isis 88, 121-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, Louis: 1963, Generalization in the Writing of History. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra: 1992, 'Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity?', The Centennial Review 36, 437-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (ed.): 1974, On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays. Anchor Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G.: 1942, 'The Function of General Laws in History', Journal of Philosophy 39, 35-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzik, Gurol: 1996, 'Was There a Post-Positivist Revolution?', presented at the First International History of Philosophy of Science Conference, 21-24 April, Roanoke VA.

  • Kitcher, Philip: 1994, 'The Naturalists Return', Journal of Philosophy 101, 58-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertke, Noretta: 1998, A House Built on Sand. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge: 1996, Cosmology and Controversy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, Richard, L: 1994, 'Experimentalist's Career', Science 266, 1890-1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', pp. 91-196 in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre: 1971, 'History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction', pp. 91-136 in Buck, R.C. and Cohen, R.S. (eds.), PSA 1970 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 8). D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.): 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry: 1977, 'The Sources of Modern Methodology', pp. 3-19 in Butts and Hintikka (eds.), Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry and Jarret, Leplin: 1991, 'Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination', Journal of Philosophy 88, 499-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, James: 1996, 'Nature Does Nothing in Vain', presented at the Pittsburgh Center for Philosophy of Science's Third Quadrennial International Fellows Conference, 20-24 May, Castiglioncello, Italy.

  • McCullagh, C. Behan: 1987, 'The Truth of Historical Narratives', pp. 30-46 in History and Theory 26: The Representation of Historical Events. Westeyan University Press, Middletown CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, Louis: 1973, 'The Divergence of History and Sociology in Recent Philosophy of History', pp. 163-181 in Fay, Brian; Golob, Eugene O., and Richard T. Vann (eds.), Louis O. Mink Historical Understanding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey, Murray G.: 1986, 'Explanation, Causes, and Covering Laws', pp. 43-57 in Ankersmit, F.R. (ed.), History and Theory 25: Knowing and Telling History: The Anglo-Saxon Debate. Wesleyan University Press, Middlebury CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey, Murray G.: 1994, Philosophical Foundations of Historical Knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas: 1995, 'Philosophy of Science and History of Science', pp. 139-163 in Thackery, Arnold (ed.), Osiris 10: Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science.

  • Norton, John D.: 1995, 'The Force of Newtonian Cosmology', presented at the 4th International Conference on the History of General Relativity, 31 July-3 August, Berlin.

  • Pinnick, Cassandra, L.: 1994, 'Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science', Philosophy of Science 61, 646-657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnick, Cassandra L.: 1998, 'What's Wrong With the Strong Programme's Case Study of the Hobbes-Boyle Dispute?', pp. 227-239 in Koertke, Noretta (ed.) A House Built on Sand. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Dale H.: 1981, The Emergence of the Past: A Theory of Historical Explanation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Clayton: 1996, The Logic of Historical Explanation. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John: 1974, 'Chomsky's Revolution in Linguistics', pp. 2-33 in Harman, Gilbert (ed.) 1974. On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays. Anchor Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, Niall and Hugh LaFollette: 1994, 'Animal Experimentation: The Legacy of Claude Bernard', International Studies in The Philosophy of Science 8, 195-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G. and Holton, G.: 1996, 'Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences', American Scientist 84, 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, Frank J.: 1996, Born to Rebel. Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackery, Arnold (ed.): 1995, Osiris 10: Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W. H.: 1951, An Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Hutchinson's University Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenneras, Christine, and Wold, Agnes: 1997, 'Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review', Nature 387, 341-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Hayden: 1987, The Content of the Form. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinnick, C., Gale, G. Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, 109–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008353021407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008353021407

Navigation