Skip to main content
Log in

The Consortium Ethics Program: An approach to establishing a permanent regional ethics network

  • Network News
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the first three-year experience of the Consortium Ethics Program (CEP-1) of the University of Pittsburgh Center for Medical Ethics, and also outlines plans for the second three-year phase (CEP-2) of this experiment in continuing ethics education. In existence since 1990, the CEP has the primary goal of creating a cost-effective, permanent ethics resource network, by utilizing the educational resources of a university bioethics center and the practical expertise of a regional hospital council. The CEP's conception and specific components stem from recognition of the need to make each hospital a major focus of educational efforts, and to provide academic support for the in-house activities of the representatives from each institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rothman D.Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.Accreditation manual for hospitals; 1992.

  3. In re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647 (1976).

  4. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: A report on the ethical medical and legal issues in treatment decisions, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fed. Reg. 49:1622, 1651 (Jan. 12, 1984)

  6. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services: Services and Treatment for Disabled Infants: Model guidelines for health care providers to establish infant care review committees. Fed. Reg. 50:14,893, Apr. 15, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Hospital Association. National Society for Patient Representatives. Percentage of hospitals with ethics committees (by bed size). Chicago, Il: AHA; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross JW,et al. Health care ethics committees: The next generation. Chicago, Il: AHA; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blake DC. The hospital ethics committee: Health care's moral conscience or white elephant?Hastings Center Report. 1992; 22(1):6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siegler M. Ethics Committees: Decisions by Bureaucracy,Hastings Center Report, 1986; 16(3):22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuczewski M., Pinkus R. (eds).An ethics casebook for community hospitals, University of Pittsburgh Center for Medical Ethics. Pittsburgh, PA; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frader J,et al. The evolution of clinical ethics teaching at the University of Pittsburgh Health Center.Academic Medicine. 1989; 64:747–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn PM. The healthcare ethics network of Oregon: A model to enhance healthcare ethics committee collaboration.HEC Forum. 1992; 4(2):135–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fletcher JC. The bioethics movement and hospital ethics committees.Maryland Law Review. 1991; 50:859–94.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thornton BC, Callahan D, Nelson JL. Bioethics education: Expanding the circle of participants.Hastings Center Report. 1993; 23(1):25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fleetwood, J. The Philadelphia story.Hastings Center Report. 1990; 20(2):33–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinkus, R.L., Aumann, G.M., Kuczewski, M.G. et al. The Consortium Ethics Program: An approach to establishing a permanent regional ethics network. HEC Forum 7, 13–32 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463358

Navigation