Skip to main content
Log in

The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper elaborates on the Golem metaphor as a way of understanding uncertainty in science. Its implications for the ethics of communicating science are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen J. C., and Pinch, T. (eds) (1995) Handbook of Science ad Technology Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA and London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life, Sage, London and Beverley Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, H.M. (1985) Changing Order, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinch, T. (1986) Confronting Nature, Kluwer.

  6. Law, J. (1987) Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering, in: Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch T. (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 111–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lynch, W. and Kline, R. (2000) Engineering Practice and Engineering Ethics, Science, Technology & Human Values 25: 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaughan, D. (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “The Naked Launch”, in: Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) The Golem at Large, Cambridge University Press, UK, 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewenstein, B. (1995) Science and the Media, in: Jasanoff et al.1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wynne, B. (1995) Public Understanding of Science, in: Jasanoff et al.1

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) The Golem: What You Should Know About Science, Brian Second Edition, Canto, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology, Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bloor, D. (1984) Knowledge and Social Imagery, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinch, T. (1994) Relativism—Is it Worth the Candle?, paper presented to the History of Science Society Annual Meeting, New Orleans.

  16. Hodges, A. (1983) Alan Turing: The Engima of Intelligence, Counterpoint, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Monk, R. (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pinch, T. (2001) Wittgenstein and Turing: The Science Wars and Two Cultures—forthcoming in: Collins, H. and Labinger, J. (eds.) One Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gross, P. and Levitt, N. (1994) Higher Supersition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science, Johns Hpkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hart, R. (1998) “The Flight From Reason: Higher Superstition and the Refutation of Science Studies, in: Ross, A. (ed.) Science Wars, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 259–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) Afterword: Golem and the Scientists, in: The Golem second edition, 151–180.

  22. Mermin, D. (1996) Reference Frame: What’s Wrong with this Sustaining Myth?, Physics Today, March: 11–13.

  23. Mermin, D. (1996) Reference Frame: The Golemization of Relativity, Physics Today, April: 11.

  24. Evans, L. (1996) Should We Care About Science ‘Studies’?, Duke Faculty Forum, October, 1–3.

  25. Feynman, R. (1986) Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman, Counterpoin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, H.M. and Pinch, T.J. (1979) Constructing the Paranormal: Nothing unscientific is Happening, Sociological Review Monographs, No. 27, Wallis (ed.) On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge, University of Keele, UK, 237–70.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Ptanp: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension, Anchor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Collins, H.M. (1974) The TEA-Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks, Science Studies 4: 165–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) The Sun in a Test-tube: the story of cold fusion, in:12, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pinch, T. (1996) “Rhetoric and the Cold Fusion Controversy”, in: Krips, JL, McGuire, J.E. and Melia, T. (eds), University of Pittsburgh Press, USA, 153–76.

    Google Scholar 

  33. This point is extensively argued and documented by Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, The University of Chicago Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Costa, S., Hughes T. and Pinch, T. (1998) Bringing it All Back Home: Some Implications of Recent Science and Technology Studies for the Classroom Science Teacher, Research in Science Education 28: 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roth, W.M., McGuinn, M.K. and Bowen, G.M. (1996) Applications of Science and Technology Studies: Effecting Change in Science Education, Science Technology & Human Values 21: 454–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge, University of California Press, Berkeley CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) ACTing Up in:13, 1262–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinch, T. The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science. Sci Eng Ethics 6, 511–523 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0010-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0010-6

Keywords

Navigation