Skip to main content
Log in

Humanism in Business – Towards a Paradigm Shift?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management theory and practice are facing unprecedented challenges. The lack of sustainability, the increasing inequity, and the continuous decline in societal trust pose a threat to ‘business as usual’ (Jackson and Nelson, 2004). Capitalism is at a crossroad and scholars, practitioners, and policy makers are called to rethink business strategy in light of major external changes (Arena, 2004; Hart, 2005). In the following, we review an alternative view of human beings that is based on a renewed Darwinian theory developed by Lawrence and Nohria (2002). We label this alternative view ‘humanistic’ and draw distinctions to current ‘economistic’ conceptions. We then develop the consequences that this humanistic view has for business organizations, examining business strategy, governance structures, leadership forms, and organizational culture. Afterward, we outline the influences of humanism on management in the past and the present, and suggest options for humanism to shape the future of management. In this manner, we will contribute to the discussion of alternative management paradigms that help solve the current crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter, S. K. (2006). Social Enterprise models and their mission and money relationships. Social Entrepreneurship – new models for sustainable social change. A. Nicholls. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.: 1997, ‘Values-Based Management’, Academy of Management Executive 11(4), 25–46.

  • Arena, C. (2004). Cause for Success: 10 Companies That Put Profit Second and Came in First. New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and Organization. The Conflict Between System and Individual. New York, Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris (1973). “Some limits of rational man organizational theory.” Public Administration Review 33: 253-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. and B. J. Avolio (1994). “Transformational Leadership And Organizational Culture.” International Journal of Public Administration 17(3/4): 541 - 554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickson, S. L. (2007). “Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value.” Academy of Management Review 32(3): 864-888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, M. and C. Coffman (1999). First Break All the Rules. New York, Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M. and T. A. Judge (1994). “Pay preferences and Job Search decisions: A Person-Organization Perspective’,.” Personnel Psychology 47(2): 317-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. A. (1989). “Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit.” Academy of Management Review 14(1): 333-349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. and R. Esteban (1999). “Governance in the Participative Organisation: Freedom, Creativity and Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 21(2-3): 173-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. and J. Porras (2002). Built to last. New York, HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1909). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York, Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, et al. (1997). “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22(1): 20-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. and S. Blader (2005). “Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures.” European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2): 211-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. and M. E. P. Seligman (2004). “Beyond money: Toward and economy of well-being.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5: 1-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. and M. Pirson (2008). Freedom and the Modern Corporation. ISBEE, Capetown, SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis (1991). “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns.” Australian Journal of Management 16(1): 49-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C., K. Davis, et al. (1988). Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). “Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, L. (2004). The Democratic Enterprise: Liberating your Business with Freedom, Flexibility and Commitment. London, Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (2005). Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems. Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1976). The managerial choice: to be efficient and to be human. Homewood, Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I. and J. Nelson (2004). Profits with Principles- seven strategies for delivering value with values. New York, Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2002). “Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): pp.235-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A. and R. D. J. Bretz (1992). “Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions.” Journal of Applied Psychology 77(3): 261-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.: 2007a, Being Human – A Renewed Darwinian Theory of Human Behavior (Cambridge, MA). www.prlawrence.com.

  • Lawrence, P.: 2007b, ‘Organizational Logic – Institutionalizing Wisdom in Organizations’, in E. H. Kessler and J. R. Bailey (eds.), Handbook of Organizational and Managerial Wisdom (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), Chap. 3.

  • Lawrence, P. and N. Nohria (2002). Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macus, M. (2002). Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Boards - Conceptual Development and Empirical Exploration. St. Gallen, HSG: 1-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1946). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. V. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. (2009). Current Trends of Humanism in Business. In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business: Perspectives on the Development of a Responsible Business Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, M. M. and L. Donaldson (1998). “Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 6(1): 5-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2006). Introduction. Social Entrepreneurship- new models of sustainable social change. A. Nicholls. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Ruemelin, J. (2009). Philosophical Grounds of Humanism in Economics. In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business: Perspectives on the Development of a Responsible Business Society. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and J. F. Veiga (1999). “Putting people first for organizational success.” Academy of Management Executive 13(2): 37-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and M. Kramer (2006). “Strategy and Society: The Link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.” Harvard Business Review 84(12):78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, K.: 1993, The Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India: In Service for Sight. H. c. 9-593-098. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Sharp Paine, L. (2003). Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1979). “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations.” American Economic Review 69: 493-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. and W. Bennis (2007). Judgment: How Winning Leaders Make Great Calls. New York, Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R.: 2006, Social Justice Research. S. f. S. o. Justice. Cambridge, MA.

  • Yunus, M. (2009). Social Entrepreneurs are the Solution. Humanism in Business: Perspectives on the Development of a Responsible Business Society. H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. von Kimakowitz. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Pirson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirson, M.A., Lawrence, P.R. Humanism in Business – Towards a Paradigm Shift?. J Bus Ethics 93, 553–565 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1

Keywords

Navigation