Skip to main content
Log in

Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse

Edited by Kornelia Konrad, Christopher Coenen, Anne Dijkstra, Colin Milburn and Harro van Lente, 2013. (IOS Press / AKA, Berlin), ISBN:978-1-61499-300-1, 248 p.

  • Book Review
  • Published:
NanoEthics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ferrari A (2010) Developments in the debate on nanoethics: traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. NanoEthics 4(1):27–52. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0081-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorman ME, Werhane PH, Swami N (2009) Moral imagination, trading zones, and the role of the ethicist in nanotechnology. NanoEthics 3(3):185–195. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0069-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grunwald A (2010) From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 4(2):91–101. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0088-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson DG (2007) Ethics and technology “in the making”: an essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):21–30. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0006-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordmann A (2007) If and then: a critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):31–46. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reichow A, Dorbeck-Jung B (2013) Discovering specific conditions for compliance with soft regulation related to work with nanomaterials. NanoEthics 7(1):83–92. doi:10.1007/s11569-013-0165-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rip A, van Lente H (2013) Bridging the gap between innovation and ELSA: the TA program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed. NanoEthics 7(1):7–16. doi:10.1007/s11569-013-0171-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roache R (2008) Ethics, speculation, and values. NanoEthics 2(3):317–327. doi:10.1007/s11569-008-0050-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruggiu D (2013) Temporal perspectives of the nanotechnological challenge to regulation: how human rights can contribute to the present and future of nanotechnologies. NanoEthics 7(3):201–215. doi:10.1007/s11569-013-0184-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruivenkamp M, Rip A (2011) Entanglement of imaging and imagining of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 5(2):185–193. doi:10.1007/s11569-011-0122-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seifert F, Plows A (2014) From anti-biotech to nano-watch: early risers and spin-off campaigners in Germany, the UK and internationally. NanoEthics 8(1):73–89. doi:10.1007/s11569-014-0189-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swierstra T, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics 1(1):3–20. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Pitts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pitts, E.A. Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse. Nanoethics 9, 85–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0221-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0221-6

Navigation