Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:03:31.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Explanation in Classical Population Genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

The recent literature in philosophy of biology has drawn attention to the different sorts of explanations proffered in the biological sciences—we have molecular, biomedical, and evolutionary explanations. Do these explanations all have a common structure or relation that they seek to capture? This paper will answer in the negative. I defend a pluralistic and pragmatic approach to explanation. Using examples from classical population genetics, I argue that formal demonstrations, and even strictly “mathematical truths,” may serve as explanatory in different historical contexts.

Type
The Making of the Genetical Theory of Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to my fellow symposiasts: Margaret Morrison, Sahotra Sarkar, and Rob Skipper for joining, and to John Beatty for chairing. Thanks also to Kyle Stanford for his questions and comments.

References

Beatty, John (1986), “The Synthesis and Synthetic Theory”, in Bechtel, William (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. (1983), The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, Joseph (1994), “Ernst Mayr as Community Architect: Launching the Society for the Study of Evolution and the Journal ‘Evolution’”, Ernst Mayr as Community Architect: Launching the Society for the Study of Evolution and the Journal ‘Evolution’ 9:387427.Google Scholar
Crow (2001), “The Beanbag Lives On”, The Beanbag Lives On 409: 771.Google Scholar
Endler, John A. (1986), Natural Selection in the Wild. Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ewens, Warren (1979), Mathematical Population Genetics. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer (1918), “The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance”, The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance 52:399433.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer (1922), “On the Dominance Ratio”, On the Dominance Ratio 42:321341.Google Scholar
Glymour, Clark (1980), “Explanation, Tests, Unity and Necessity”, Explanation, Tests, Unity and Necessity 14:3150.Google Scholar
Grantham, Todd (1999), “Explanatory Pluralism in Paleobiology”, Explanatory Pluralism in Paleobiology 66 (Proceedings): S223S236.Google Scholar
Haldane, Haldane John Burdon (1924), “A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection. Part I”, A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection. Part I 23:1941.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Vernon L. (1903), Darwinism To-day: A Discussion of Present-Day Scientific Selection Theories. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley C. (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 13. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 410505.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, and Salmon, Wesley (1987), “Van Fraassen on Explanation”, Van Fraassen on Explanation 84(6): 315330.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard (2000), “What Do Population Geneticists Know and How Do They Know It?”, in Creath, Richard and Mainschein, Jane (eds.), Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth, and Anderson, Carl (1993), “Empiricism, Objectivity and Explanation”, in French, Peter A., Ueling, Theodore E., and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 18. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 121131.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1959), “Where Are We?”, Where Are We? 24:409440.Google Scholar
Moran, Moran Patrick Alfred, and Smith, C. A. B. (1966), “Commentary on R. A. Fisher’s Paper on the Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance”, Commentary on R. A. Fisher’s Paper on the Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance 41:162.Google Scholar
Provine, William B. ([1971] 2001), The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punnett, Reginald ([1916] 1976), report on Fisher’s paper, Whittingham Lodge, Cambridge. Reproduced in Bernard Norton and E. S. Pearson, “A Note on the Background to, and Refereeing of, R. A. Fisher’s 1918 Paper ‘On the Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance’”, A Note on the Background to, and Refereeing of, R. A. Fisher’s 1918 Paper ‘On the Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance’ 31:151162.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter (1981), “Probability, Explanation, and Information”, Probability, Explanation, and Information 48:233256.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert (1992), “Explanation: Pragmatics and Asymmetry”, Pacific Division, APA.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1990), “Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification”, Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification 90:324.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty (1996), Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1983), “Equilibrium Explanation”, Equilibrium Explanation 43:201210.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1999), Philosophy of Biology, Dimensions of Philosophy Series. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woody, Andrea (2004), “More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals about Scientific Explanation”, More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals about Scientific Explanation 71 (Proceedings): 780793.Google Scholar