Skip to main content
Log in

Note Critiche

Critical notes

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. I. Angelelli,Studies on Gottlob Frege and traditional philosophy, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.T. Canty,Leśniewski's ontology and Gödel's incompleteness theorem, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.T. Canty, “Leśniewski's terminological explanations as recursive concepts”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 10, 1969, 337–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Casari (a cura),Dalla logica alla metalogica, Sansoni, Firenze, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Dambska, “Francois Brentano et la pensée philosophique en Pologne: Casimir Twardowski et son ecole”,Grazer Philosophische Studien 5, 1978, 117–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Grzegorczyk, “The systems of Leśniewski in relation to contemporary logical research”,Studia Logica 3, 1955, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.P. Henry,Medieval logic and metaphysics: A modern introduction, Hutchinson University Library, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.P. Henry,Medieval mereology, Grüner, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Kotarbiński,Gnosiology. The scientific approach to the theory of knowledge, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kotarbiński, “Garstka wspomnien o Stanisławie Leśniewskin” [Una manciata di ricordi di Stanisław Leśniewski],Ruch Filosoficzny, 24, 1966.

  11. T. Kotarbiński, “Notes on the development of formal logic in Poland in the years 1900–1939”, in [McCall 1967], 1–14.

  12. T. Kubiński, “Pewna teoriomnogościowa własnośc ontologii” [Alcune proprietà modellistiche dell'ontologia],Ruch Filozoficzny 27, 1969.

  13. C. Lejewski, “On Leśniewski's ontology”, in [Srzednicki-Rickey 1984], 123–148.

  14. C. Lejewski, “Ricordando Stanisław Leśniewski”, a cura di M. Libardi,Quaderni del centro studi per la filosofia mitteleuropea 1, Trento, 1989.

  15. S. Leśniewski,Lecture notes in logic, Kluwer, The Hague, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Łukasiewicz,O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa. Studyum krytyczna [Sul principio di contraddizione in Aristotele. Studio critico], Polska Akademia Umiejetnoś ci, Kraków, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Luschei,The logical systems of Leśniewski, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. McCall (ed.),Polish Logic. 1920–1939, Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Mieville,Un developpement des systemes logiques de Stanisław Leśniewski. Protothetique-Ontologie-Mereologie, Lang, Bern-Frankfurt-New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Poli,Ontologia formale, Marietti, Genova, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V.W.O. Quine,La relatività ontologica e altri saggi, Armando, Roma, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Rickey, “Axiomatic inscriptional sintax, Part I: General sintax”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13, 1972, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Rickey, “A survey in Leśniewski's logic”,Studia Logica 36, 1977, 407–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Rivetti Barbò,L'antinomia del mentitore nel pensiero contemporaneo, Vita e Pensiero, Milano, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Runes,Dizionario di filosofia, Mondadori, Milano, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.C. Shepherdson, “Innere models for set theory”, I,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1951, 161–190.

  27. J.C. Shepherdson, “Innere models for set theory”, II,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1952, 225–237.

  28. J.C. Shepherdson, “Innere models for set theory”, III,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1953, 145–167.

  29. P. Simons, “A Brentanian basis for Leśniewskian logic”,Logique et Analyse, 1984, 297–307.

  30. P. Simons, P., “A semantics for ontology”,Dialectica 39, 1985, 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Simons, “Brentano's reform of logic”,Topoi, 1987, 25–38.

  32. J. Słupecki, “S. Leśniewski's calculus of names”, in [Srzednicki-Rickey 1984], 59–122.

  33. B. Sobociński, “On well constructed axiom systems”,Rocznik 6, 1955, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Srzednicki and V.F. Rickey (eds.),Leśniewski's systems: ontology and mereology, Kluwer, The Hague, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. Suppes, “Philosophical implications of Tarski's work”,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1988, 80–91.

  36. S. Surma, “On the work and influence of St. Leśniewski”,Logic Colloquium 76, North-Holland, 1977.

  37. A. Sweet, “The pragmatics of first order languages”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1972, 145–60.

  38. A. Sweet, “The pragmatics of first order languages”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1975, 119–31.

  39. A. Sweet, “Intendeed model theory”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1979, 575–92.

  40. A. Tarski, “Appendix E”, in [Woodger 1937], 161–72.

  41. A. Tarski,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1928, Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Tarski, “Il concetto di verità nei linguaggi formalizzati”, in [Rivetti Barbò 1961], 391–675.

  43. J. Woodger,The axiomatic method in biology, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliografia

  1. L. Albertazzi e R. Poli (a cura),Brentano in Italia, Guerini, Milano, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bozzi, “Benussi e la psicologia italiana”, intervista a cura di Liliana Albertazzi e Roberto Poli, in [Albertazzi Poli 1993], 175–81.

  3. H. Burkhardt and B. Smith (eds.),Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology, 2 voll., Philosophia, Munich, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Cocchiarella, “On the logic of nominalized predicates and its philosophical interpretations”,Erkenntnis, 1978, 339–69.

  5. N. Cocchiarella, “Conceptualism, ramified logic and nominalized predicates”,Topoi, 1986, 75–86.

  6. N. Cocchiarella,Logical investigations of predications theory and the problem of universals, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Cocchiarella, “Conceptualism, realism, and intensional logic”,Topoi, 1989, 15–34.

  8. N. Cocchiarella, “Philosophical perspectives on formal theories of predication”, in [Gabbay Guenthner 1989], 254–326.

  9. N. Cocchiarella, ; “Ontology II: formal ontology”, in [Burkhardt Smith 1991], 640–47.

  10. N. Cocchiarella, “Conceptual realism as a formal ontology”, in [Poli Simons 1993].

  11. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. IV, Reidel, 1989.

  12. R. Haddock, “On Husserl's distinction between state of affairs (Sachverhalt) and situation of affairs (Sachlage)”, in [Seebohm Føllesdal Mohanty 1991], 35–48.

  13. K. Lambert,Meinong and the principle of independence, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Parsons,Nonexistent Objects, Yale U. P., New Haven, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Poli and P. Simons (eds.),Formal Ontology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Routley,Exploring Meinong's Jungle. Philosophy Department, Australian National University, Canberra, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.M. Seebohm, D. Føllesdal and J.N. Mohanty (eds),Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Wiggins,Sameness and Substance, Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Zalta,Abstract Objects, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Zalta,Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Libardi, M., Poli, R. Note Critiche. Axiomathes 4, 105–140 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229773

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229773

Navigation