Skip to main content
Log in

The theory of nomic probability

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article sketches a theory of objective probability focusing on nomic probability, which is supposed to be the kind of probability figuring in statistical laws of nature. The theory is based upon a strengthened probability calculus and some epistemological principles that formulate a precise version of the statistical syllogism. It is shown that from this rather minimal basis it is possible to derive theorems comprising (1) a theory of direct inference, and (2) a theory of induction. The theory of induction is not of the familiar Bayesian variety, but consists of a precise version of the traditional Nicod Principle and its statistical analogues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, G. A.: 1949, ‘Statistical Inference’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society BII, 115–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G. A.: 1966, ‘The Use of the Likelihood Function in Statistical Practice’, Proceedings V Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability I, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G. A.: 1967, ‘The Bayesian Controversy in Statistical Inference’, J. Inst. Actuar. 93, 229–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, Allan: 1969, ‘Concepts of Statistical Inference’, in S. Morganbesser, P. Suppes, and M. White (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Method, St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 112–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1957, Perceiving, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1977, Theory of Knowledge. 2d. edn., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick: 1981, ‘A Version of Foundationalism’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, eds. P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Vol. V, pp. 543–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R.: 1958, ‘Some Problems Connected With Statistical Inference’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29, 357–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P.: 1964, ‘On the Difficulties Inherent in Fisher's Fiducial Argument’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 59, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P.: 1966, ‘Review of The Logic of Statistical Inference’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 61, 1233–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.: 1979, ‘A Truth Maintenance System’, Artificial Intelligence 12, 231–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. W. F.: 1972, Likelihood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, D. W.: 1983, Formalizing Nonmonotonic Reasoning Systems, Computer Science Tech. Report No. 83-1, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A.: 1921, ‘On the ‘Probable Error’ of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced From a Small Sample’, Metron I(Pt. 4), 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A.: 1922, ‘On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 222 (Series A), 309–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. A.: 1973, An Objective Theory of Probability, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian: 1965, Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogoroff, A. N.: 1933, Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Julius Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, Henry, Jr.: 1961, Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, Henry, Jr.: 1970, ‘Conjunctivitis’, in Marshall Swain (ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, Henry, Jr.: 1974, The Logical Foundations of Statistical Inference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, Henry, Jr.: 1983, ‘The Reference Class’, Philosophy of Science 50, 374–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.: 1980, ‘Circumscription — a Form of Nonmonotomic Reasoning’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.: 1984, ‘Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common Sense Knowledge’, Proceedings of the Nonmonotonic Reasoning Workshop, New Platz NY, pp. 295–324.

  • McDermott, D. V.: 1982, ‘Nonmonotonic Logic II: Monmonotonic Modal Theories’, J. ACM 29(1), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D. V. and J. Doyle: 1980, ‘Nonmonotonic Logic I’, Artificial Intellience 13, 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.: 1986, LDR: A Logic for Defeasible Reasoning, ACMA Research Report No. 01-0013, University of Georgia, Athens GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.: 1987, ‘Defeasible Reasoning’, Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, pp. 470–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.: 1988, ‘Defeasible Reasoning: a Philosophical Analysis in Prolog’, in J. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 251–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1967, ‘Criteria and Our Knowledge of the Material World’, The Philosophical Review LXXVI, 28–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1968, ‘What is an Epistemological Problem’, American Philosophical Quarter 5, 183–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1971, ‘Perceptual Knowledge’, Philosophical Review LXXX, 287–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1974, Knowledge and Justification, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1974a, ‘Subjunctive Generalizations’, Synthese 28, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1983, ‘A Theory of Direct Inference’, Theory and Decision 15, 29–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1983a, ‘Epistemology and Probability’, Synthese 55, 231–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1984, ‘Foundations for Direct Inference’, Theory and Decision 17, 221–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1984a, ‘A Solution to the Problem of Induction’, Noûs 18, 423–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1986, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1986a, ‘The Paradox of the Preface’, Philosophy of Science 53, 246–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1987, ‘Defeasible Reasoning’, Cognitive Science 11, 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1987a, ‘Probability and Proportions’, in H. Berghel and G. Eberlein (eds.), Theory and Decision: Essays in Honor of Werner Leinfellner, D. Reidel, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1990, Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D.: 1985, ‘On the Comparison of Theories: Preferring the Most Specific Explanation’, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, John W.: 1961, ‘A Review of E. L. Lehmann's Testing Statistical Hypotheses’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 56, 163–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R.: 1980, ‘A Logic for Default Reasoning’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfeld, Teddy: 1979, Philosophical Problems of Statistical Inference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollock, J.L. The theory of nomic probability. Synthese 90, 263–299 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485353

Keywords

Navigation