Ukrainian historical thought in the systems of notations and hagiographies of the Renaissance epoch educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2018.2(154).132976Keywords:
historical scientific thought of Ukraine, hagiography, notation, biographical method, personalities of the epoch, pedagogical Renaissance of UkraineAbstract
The necessity of engaging biographical materials of the representatives of the Pedagogical Renaissance of Ukraine (XIV - XV) is grounded. These materials should be implemented to the history of the Ukrainian humanitarian discourse. The author uses for the first time scientific method of studying the systems of notations and hagiographies of outstanding representatives of the Ukrainian Renaissance. Activity and creative heritage of the outstanding representatives of the pedagogy of the Pedagogical Renaissance of Ukraine (XIV - XV) in the systems of notations and hagiographies are presented in the article: Pavel Rusin (approx. 1470-1517), Yuri Kotermak (Drogobich) (approx. 1450-1494), and others. The author implements a biographical method for studying collective biographies of outstanding representatives of the Ukrainian Renaissance in the history of Ukrainian scientific thought. The origin of the term "hagiography" is explored through the notion of "collective biography".
The experience of the foundation of human existence in the context of cultural development in modern Ukrainian scientific thought is disclosed in the article. The idea of an interdisciplinary approach in the study of "human life" is described on the material of works that exist in the philosophical, cultural, psychological and historical discourse of modern scientific thought in the post-soviet space. Much attention is paid to the theoretical analysis of historiographical sources of this problem. In the course of the analysis, the categorical apparatus of the thesaurus of the biographical method was discovered during the study of the systems of notations and hagiography on the material of the Ukrainian educators (XIV - XV centuries) - Pavel Rusin (approx. 1470-1517), Yuri Kotermak (Drogobich) (approx. 1450-1494), and others. Creativity of each person is considered as a unique phenomenon and at the same time is understood as a component of the whole process of development of historical scientific thought of Ukraine. The concepts of "destiny", "life path", "model of the world", "external and internal determination" are generalized. The interaction of all the concepts in the biography of educators is considered.
The further prospect of research assumes in application of the described methods in a science.References
Abulhanova-Slavskaya, K. A., 1991. Strategiya zhizni [The strategy of life]. Moscow: Myisl [in Russian].
Ananev, B. G., 1977. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya [About the problems of modern human science]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Ananev, B. G., 2001. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniy [Human as an object of knowledge]. Saint-Petesrburg: Piter [in Russian].
Antsyiferova, L. I. and Lomov, V. M., 1990. Lichnost s pozitsiy dinamicheskogo podhoda [Personality from a dynamic approach]. In: Psihologiya lichnosti v sotsialisticheskom obschestve: lichnost i ee zhiznennyiy put. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Babulina, L.V., 2007. Sub’ektnyie i stsenarnyie strategii zhiznennogo puti lichnosti [Subject and scenario strategies of a person’s life path]. Mir psihologii. № 1. рр. 68-78 [in Russian].
Bahtin, M.M., 1986. Epos i roman (O metodologii issledovaniya romana) [Epic and Novel. Toward a Methodology for the Study of the Novel.] In: Literaturno-kriticheskie statii. Moscow: Hudozh. lit. [in Russian].
Gobozov, I.A., 2008. Sotsialnaya filosofiya [Social Philosophy]: ucheb. slov. Moscow: Akadem. proekt [in Russian].
Gurevich, A. Ya., 1984. Kategorii srednevekovoy kulturyi [Categories of medieval culture]. Moscow: Iskusstvo [in Russian].
Diltey, V., 1995. Tipyi mirovozzreniya i obnaruzhenie ih v metafizicheskih sistemah [Types of worldview and their detection in the metaphysical systems]. In: Levit, S. Ya. [comp., ed.] Kulturologiya. XX vek. Moscow: Yurist [in Russian].
Zlobina, E.G. and Sohan, L.V. and Tihonovich, V.A., 1987. Zhiznennyiy put lichnosti (voprosyi teorii i metodologii sotsialno-psihologicheskogo issledovaniya) [Personal life path (questions of theory and methodology of socio-psychological research)]. Kiev: Nauk. dumka [in Russian].
Kagan, M.S., 1974. Chelovecheskaya deyatelnost: opyit sistemnogo anali za. [Human activity: the experience of system analysis]. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
Krivtsun, O.A., 2003. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow: Aspekt Press [in Russian].
Leontev, D.A., 1999. Psihologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyislovoy realnosti [Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of the semantic reality]. Moscow: Smyisl [in Russian].
Leontev, D.A., 2001. Zhiznetvorchestvo kak praktika rasshireniya zhiz-nennogo mira [Lifecreation as a practice of expanding the vital world]. 1-ya Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya po ekzistentsialnoy psihologii. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].
Loginova, N.A., 1980. Sharlotta Byuler - predstavitel gumanisticheskoy psihologiі [Charlotte Buhler - representative of humanistic psychology]. Voprosyi psihologii. № 1 [in Russian].
Losev, A.F., 1989. Istoriya antichnoy filosofii v konspektivnom izlozhenii. [The history of ancient philosophy in a summary (brief) presentation]. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
Riker, P., 2002. Intelektualna avtobiografIya. Lyubov i spravedlivIst [Intellectual autobiography. I love justice]: Kiev [in Ukrainian].
Rubinshteyn, S.L., 1973. Problemyi obschey psihologiі [Problems of general psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
Solovev, E.Yu., 1981. Biograficheskiy analiz kak vid istoriko-filosofskogo issledovaniya [Biographical analysis as a type of historical and philosophical study]. Voprosyi filosofii. № 9 [in Russian].
Suhomlinska, O.V., 1999. Personaliyi v istoriko-pedagogichnomu diskursi [Persons in the historical-pedagogical discourse]. Shlyah osvity. № 1 [in Ukrainian].
Flier, A.Ya., 2000. Kulturologiya dlya kulturologov [Culturology for Culturologists]. Moscow: Akadem. Proekt, 2000 [in Russian].
Biletskiy, V.S. and Biletsky, V.V., 2017. Self-traditions of education and science in Ukraine-Russia. Studia Polsko-Ukrainskie. Warszawa No. 4: 51-68 (pol.).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Olena Popovych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
